Cited by 355Exercise and Physiological ResponsesCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and Health

Physical activity and plasma interleukin-6 in humans - effect of intensity of exercise

Ostrowski, Kenneth, Schjerling, Peter, Pedersen, Bente Klarlund·2000·European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

The present study included data from three marathon races to investigate the hypothesis that a relationship exists between running intensity and elevated concentrations of interleukin (IL)-6 in plasma. The study included a total of 53 subjects whose mean age was 30.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4] years, mean body mass 77.7 (95% CI 2.0) kg, mean maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) 59.3 (95% CI 1.4) ml x min(-1) x kg(-1), and who had participated in the Copenhagen Marathons of 1996, 1997 or 1998, achieving a mean running time of 206 (95% CI 7) min. Running intensity was calculated as running speed divided by VO2 max. The concentration of IL-6 in plasma peaked immediately after the run. There was a negative correlation between peak IL-6 concentration and running time (r = -0.30, P<0.05) and a positive correlation between peak IL-6 concentration and running intensity (r = 0.32, P<0.05). The IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) plasma concentration peaked 1.5 h after the run and there was a positive correlation between the peak plasma concentrations of IL-6 and IL-1ra (r = 0.39, P<0.01). Creatine kinase (CK) plasma concentration peaked on the 1st day after the run, but no association was found between peak concentrations of IL-6 and CK. In conclusion, the results confirmed the hypothesized association between plasma IL-6 concentration and running intensity, but did not confirm the previous finding of a connection between IL-6 plasma concentration and muscle damage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s004210000312

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ostrowski, K., Schjerling, P., & Pedersen, B. K.
Affiliations
Rigshospitalet (DK)
Venue
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2000-12-13
Volume
83
Issue
6
Pages
512-515
ISSN
  • 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-6319
  • 1439-6327
OpenAlex
W2067445057
Cited by
355
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 18
FWCI
7.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
interleukin-6, exercise intensity, marathon running, plasma cytokines, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, creatine kinase, exercise-induced muscle damage, running speed, VO2max
MeSH terms
Adult, Creatine Kinase, Physical Exertion, Humans, Male, Osmolar Concentration, Oxygen Consumption, Running, Sialoglycoproteins, Time Factors, Interleukin-6, Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review