Cited by 46Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

When ignorance is bliss: explicit instruction and the efficacy of CBM-A for anxiety

Grafton, Ben, Mackintosh, Bundy, Vujic, Tara, MacLeod, Colin·2014·Cognitive Therapy and Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10608-013-9579-3

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Effects of explicit instructions in one- or two-session ABM training in nonclinical participants may not generalise to multi-session ABM training in clinically anxious individuals.

    “It is helpful to distinguish between their effects in one-or twosession ABM training in nonclinical participants, versus multi-session ABM training in clinically anxious individuals, because the former may not generalise to the latter [87].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grafton, B., Mackintosh, B., Vujic, T., & MacLeod, C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • University of Essex (GB)
Corresponding author
Grafton, Ben
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2013-09-11
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
172-188
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W2045641867
Cited by
46
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Autoritatea Natională pentru Cercetare Stiintifică
  • Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
cognitive bias modification, attentional bias modification, anxiety, explicit instruction, selective attention, negative information, stress response, treatment efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review