CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 494Innovative Teaching MethodsInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsOnline and Blended Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 124 of the 130 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: a meta-analysis

Cheng, Li, Ritzhaupt, Albert D., Antonenko, Pavlo·2019·Educational Technology Research and Development
DOI 10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7

Cites

124 of 124 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Baker, J. W. (2000a). The “classroom flip”: Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side. Paper presented at the 11th international conference on College Teaching and Learning, Jacksonville, FL.
  2. Baker, J. W. (2003). The “classroom flip”: A model for pedagogically effective use of a course management system. Paper presented at Southwestern Ohio Council for Higher Education Teaching and Technology Workshop. Retrieved March 16, 2016, from http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/media_and_applied_communications_presentations/16 .
  3. Lavelle, J. P., Stimpson, M. T., & Brill, E. D. (2013). Flipped out engineering economy: Converting a traditional class to an inverted model. In A. Krishnamurthy & W. K. V. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2013 industrial systems engineering research conference (pp. 397–407). Puerto Rico: High Beam Research.
  4. *Lloyd, J., & Ebener, B. (2014). Flipping a non-majors’ biology class: Using video lectures, online resources, and a student response system to facilitate deeper learning. Journal of the Idaho Academy of Science, 50(1), 93.
  5. *Metcalf, D. (2015). The impact of flipping a middle school classroom on student achievement. Master’s thesis, California State University, California. Retrieved March 16, 2016, from https://scholarworks.csustan.edu/handle/011235813/947 .
  6. *Montgomery, J. (2015). The effects of flipped learning on middle school students’ achievement with common core mathematics. Master’s thesis, California State University San Marcos, California. Retrieved March 16, 2016, from http://csusm-dspace.calstate.edu/bitstream/handle/10211.3/143668/MontgomeryJared_Summer2015.pdf;sequence=1 .
  7. Pearson Partners on Flipped Learning. (2013). Electronic education report, 20(14), 5. Retrieved March 16, 2016, from http://www.electroniceducationreport.com/content/pearson-partners-flipped-learning .
  8. *Prepose, L. S. (2015). Online, flipped, and traditional instruction: A comparison of student performance in higher education. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, California. Retrieved March 16, 2016, from http://digitallibrary.usc.edu/cdm/ref/collection/p15799coll3/id/570066 .
  9. *Sengel, E. (2014). Using the ‘flipped classroom’ to enhance physics achievement of the prospective teacher impact of flipped classroom model on physics course. Journal of the Balkan Tribological Association, 20(3), 488–497.
  10. *Smith, J. P. (2015). The efficacy of a flipped learning classroom, Doctoral dissertation. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global (ProQuest document ID: 1713692218).
  11. Zhai, X., Gu, J., Liu, H., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). An experiential learning perspective on students’ satisfaction model in a Flipped Classroom context. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 198–210.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 494

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Ritzhaupt, Albert D.
ORCID
Venue
Educational Technology Research and Development
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-10-29
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
793-824
ISSN
  • 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6501
DOI
10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7
OpenAlex
W2899228373
Cited by
494
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
13.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Educational Technology Research and Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
flipped classroom, learning outcomes, teaching methods, traditional classroom comparison, cognitive outcomes, effect size, publication bias, teaching practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review