Cited by 214Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

The complicated relationship between attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and substance use disorders

Open access
Zulauf, Courtney A., Sprich, Susan E., Safren, Steven A., Wilens, Timothy E.·2014·Current Psychiatry Reports

Abstract

Adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders (SUD) and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are increasingly presenting in clinical practice. The overlap and role of treatment for these co-occurring disorders remains unclear. A review of the literature was conducted to highlight and update recent evidence on the overlap of ADHD and SUD, the role of ADHD medication on later SUD, and the treatment of ADHD and SUD in adolescents and young adults. Recent work continues to highlight the high risk for comorbid ADHD in patients with SUD; and conversely, the high risk for SUD developing in ADHD across the lifespan, particularly in the context of comorbid conduct disorder. Although the data remains discordant, it appears that ADHD pharmacotherapy does not increase the risk for SUD. Medication treatment alone does not appear to be particularly effective in treating SUD in currently active substance abusing individuals with ADHD. Structured therapies may be effective in treating adolescents and young adults with ADHD and SUD. Further controlled trials evaluating the sequence and effect of structured psychotherapies and/or ADHD pharmacotherapy on SUD relapse in these groups are warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11920-013-0436-6

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overuse of drug testing is more common in minoritized populations with SUD.

    “overuse of drug testing is more common in minoritized populations with SUD.199,200”

    From The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [200]

    The section on early ADHD treatment mentions drug-negative urine screens as a trial outcome, but does not discuss overuse of testing or differences between population groups. Searches for drug-testing overuse and racial or ethnic disparities found no passage addressing the claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Drug testing is known to introduce potential bias against minoritized populations.

    “Because drug testing is known to introduce potential bias against minoritized populations”

    From The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [200]

    The section “Does Early Treatment of ADHD Influence the Risk for Later SUD?” mentions drug-negative urine screens as a trial outcome, but does not discuss bias in drug testing. Searches for drug-testing bias and racial or ethnic disparities found no passage addressing potential bias against minoritized populations. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zulauf, C. A., Sprich, S. E., Safren, S. A., & Wilens, T. E.
Affiliations
Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Wilens, Timothy E.
Venue
Current Psychiatry Reports
Published
2014-02-15
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
436-436
ISSN
  • 1523-3812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-1645
OpenAlex
W2025736977
Cited by
214
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Psychiatry Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K24MH094214)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, substance use disorders, comorbidities, adolescents, young adults, ADHD medication, conduct disorder, psychotherapy, relapse prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Antidepressive Agents, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Central Nervous System Agents, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Psychotherapy, Risk Factors, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review