Cited by 71Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsStress and Burnout ResearchPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Changes in Facets of Mindfulness Predict Stress and Anger Outcomes for Police Officers

Bergman, Aaron L., Christopher, Michael S., Bowen, Sarah·2016·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-016-0522-z

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bergman, A. L., Christopher, M. S., & Bowen, S.
Affiliations
Pacific University Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Bergman, Aaron L.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2016-04-06
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
851-858
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2319233169
Cited by
70
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Funders
Pacific University (Faculty Development Grant)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
mindfulness facets, police officers, occupational stress, organizational stress, operational stress, anger, law enforcement, help-seeking, maladaptive coping, officer well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review