Cited by 818Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Accumulation of abnormally phosphorylated τ precedes the formation of neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer's disease

Bancher, C., Brunner, C., Lassmann, H., Budka, H., Jellinger, K., Wiche, G., Seitelberger, F., Grundke-Iqbal, I., Iqbal, K., Wisniewski, H.M.·1989·Brain Research

Abstract

The intraneuronal accumulation of paired helical filaments in the form of neurofibrillary tangles is one hallmark of the brain pathology in Alzheimer's disease. At certain predilection sites, a small number of similar lesions are also present in the brains of the majority of aged non-demented individuals. As suggested by several studies before, these abnormal cytoskeletal structures contain determinants of microtubule-associated protein tau and ubiquitin. The present study uses a morphological classification of neurofibrillary tangles into different stages of maturation, as suggested by Alzheimer in 1911, and shows by quantitative immunocytochemistry that early stages of neurofibrillary degeneration contain abnormally phosphorylated tau. Immunoreactivity for the altered tau is seen not only in tangles but also in the cytoplasm of some nerve cells lacking neurofibrillary tangles. Similar numbers of such immunoreactive neurons without tangles are present in age-matched non-demented individuals as in Alzheimer cases, but are absent in young controls. In contrast, incorporation of an epitope, recognized by a monoclonal antibody (3-39) raised to paired helical filaments, which is directed against a determinant residing in the 50-65 amino acid residue region of ubiquitin occurs late in the process of tangle maturation and is most pronounced in extracellular 'ghost tangles'. It is suggested that the accumulation of abnormally phosphorylated tau is one of the earliest cytoskeletal ch…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(89)91396-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bancher, C., Brunner, C., Lassmann, H., Budka, H., Jellinger, K., Wiche, G., Seitelberger, F., Grundke-Iqbal, I., Iqbal, K., & Wisniewski, H. M.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Bancher, C.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-01
Volume
477
Issue
1-2
Pages
90-99
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077422298
Cited by
818
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 22
FWCI
21.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG04220, AG-05892)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 18105)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
tau protein, neurofibrillary tangles, Alzheimer's disease, paired helical filaments, ubiquitin, cytoskeletal changes, proteolysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Humans, Microscopy, Electron, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Middle Aged, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurofibrils, Phosphorylation, Reference Values, tau Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review