Cited by 123Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Reserpine impairs spatial working memory performance in monkeys: reversal by the α2-adrenergic agonist clonidine

Jing Xia Cai, Yuan-ye Ma, Line Xu, Xian-tian Hu·1993·Brain Research

Abstract

Repeated daily treatment with the catecholamine-depleting agent, reserpine, dramatically reduced performance on the delayed response task, a test of spatial working memory that depends upon the integrity of the prefrontal cortex. Delayed response performance fell from an average of 27.2/30 trials correct before reserpine treatment to an average of 20.4/30 trials correct after repeated reserpine administration. Injection of the alpha 2-adrenergic agonist, clonidine (0.0001-0.05 mg/kg), to chronic reserpine-treated monkeys significantly restored performance on the delayed response task; performance after an optimal dose averaged 27.8/30 trials correct. Clonidine's beneficial effects on delayed response performance were longlasting; monkeys remained improved for more than 24 h after a single clonidine injection. The finding that clonidine is efficacious in reserpinized animals supports the hypothesis that alpha 2-adrenergic agonists improve cognitive function through actions at postsynaptic, alpha 2-adrenergic receptors on non-adrenergic cells. In contrast to the delayed response task, reserpine had little effect on performance of a visual discrimination task, a reference memory task which does not depend on the prefrontal cortex. These results emphasize the importance of postsynaptic, alpha 2-adrenergic mechanisms in the regulation of working memory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(93)91034-p

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The beneficial effects of α2-agonists arise from stimulation of postsynaptic α2A-receptors in the PFC.

    “Although previous research focused on presynaptic receptor actions, research has established that the beneficial effects of α2-agonists arise from stimulation of postsynaptic α2A-receptors in the PFC (Arnsten and Goldman-Rakic, 1985; Cai et al., 1993).”
  • Depletion of noradrenaline or blockade of α2A-receptors in the prefrontal cortex impairs working memory, whereas stimulation of postsynaptic α2A-receptors in the prefrontal cortex improves working memory performance.

    “Thus, either depletion of noradrenaline52 or blockade of α2A-receptors in the PFC53 impairs working memory, whereas stimulation of postsynaptic α2A-receptors in the PFC improves working memory performance52,56–58.”
  • Stimulation of postsynaptic α2A receptors in dorsolateral PFC improves working memory performance.

    “Conversely, stimulation of postsynaptic α2A receptors in dorsolateral PFC, e.g., with guanfacine infusions directly into this region, improves working memory performance (35,41–43).”
  • Guanfacine mimics the enhancing effects of norepinephrine at postsynaptic α2A-receptors in the PFC, strengthening network connectivity.

    “In contrast, guanfacine mimics the enhancing effects of norepinephrine at postsynaptic α2A-receptors in the PFC, strengthening network connectivity.”
  • Beneficial effects of α2-AR agonists on cognition arise from postsynaptic α2A-AR in PFC.

    “early research determined that the beneficial effects of α2-AR agonists on cognition arose from postsynaptic receptor actions in the PFC (Arnsten and Goldman-Rakic, 1985, Cai et al., 1993), with a pharmacological profile consistent with the α2A-AR subtype (Arnsten et al., 1988, Arnsten and Leslie, 1991), a finding later confirmed in genetically altered mice (Franowicz et al., 2002).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cai, J. X., Ma, Y.-Y., Xu, L., & Hu, X.-T.
Affiliations
Kunming Institute of Zoology (CN)
Corresponding author
Jing Xia Cai
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-06
Volume
614
Issue
1-2
Pages
191-196
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970116189
Cited by
122
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
reserpine, clonidine, spatial working memory, alpha2-adrenoceptors, prefrontal cortex, delayed response task, reference memory, visual discrimination, catecholamine depletion, cognitive enhancement, monkeys
MeSH terms
Adrenergic alpha-Agonists, Animals, Blood Pressure, Clonidine, Cognition, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Macaca mulatta, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Synaptic Transmission, Norepinephrine, Reserpine, Reversal Learning, Space Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review