Cited by 467Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Cholinergic Interneurons Control Local Circuit Activity and Cocaine Conditioning

Open access
Witten, Ilana B., Lin, Shih-Chun, Brodsky, Matthew, Prakash, Rohit, Diester, Ilka, Anikeeva, Polina, Gradinaru, Viviana, Ramakrishnan, Charu +1 more·2010·Science

Abstract

Few But Powerful: Drug activation of the different types of acetylcholine receptors in cholinergic neurons often generates opposing or conflicting effects. Using optogenetic techniques in transgenic mice, Witten et al. (p. 1677 ) investigated the function of a rather enigmatic subpopulation of cholinergic neurons, the giant interneurons of the nucleus accumbens. Their excitation paradoxically reduced neighboring medium spiny neuron firing, while their inhibition increased medium spiny neuron firing. Furthermore, the giant interneurons were directly activated by cocaine, and silencing their drug-induced activity during cocaine exposure in freely behaving animals disrupted cocaine reward.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1193771

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Witten, I. B., Lin, S.-C., Brodsky, M., Prakash, R., Diester, I., Anikeeva, P., Gradinaru, V., Ramakrishnan, C., & Deisseroth, K.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Witten, Ilana B.
  • Lin, Shih-Chun
  • Brodsky, Matthew
  • Prakash, Rohit
  • Deisseroth, Karl
Venue
Science
Published
2010-12-17
Volume
330
Issue
6011
Pages
1677-1681
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1966698116
Cited by
467
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 50
FWCI
17.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (DP1OD000616)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH075957, R01MH086373)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA020794)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
cholinergic interneurons, nucleus accumbens, acetylcholine, optogenetic manipulation
MeSH terms
Acetylcholine, Action Potentials, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Choline O-Acetyltransferase, Cocaine, Conditioning, Psychological, Interneurons, Mice, Transgenic, Motor Activity, Neurons, Nucleus Accumbens, Reward, Mice, Inhibitory Postsynaptic Potentials, Synaptic Potentials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review