Cited by 161Stress Responses and CortisolNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsTryptophan and brain disorders

Stress-induced glucocorticoids as a neuroendocrine alarm signal of danger

Open access
Frank, Matthew G., Watkins, Linda R., Maier, Steven F.·2013·Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

Abstract

A considerable number of studies demonstrate that acute and chronic stressors prime CNS innate immune responses to subsequent pro-inflammatory challenges and that glucocorticoids mediate, in part, stress-induced sensitization of pro-inflammatory immune responses. Here, we explore the notion that GCs produce a persisting sensitization of CNS innate immune effectors (e.g. microglia) so that they will generate a potentiated pro-inflammatory response after the GC rise has dissipated, thereby enhancing the sickness response to infection or injury and maximizing the animal's ability to neutralize danger. The stress-induced GC response is conceptualized here as an neuroendocrine warning signal or alarmin to the innate immune system, which prepares or sensitizes the innate immune response to potential danger. Thus, a new understanding of the stress response and its function (priming CNS innate immune responses to infection or injury during a fight/flight emergency) would be suggested.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.02.004

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In primitive organisms, threats engage defensive reflexes that are energy intensive; if unsuccessful, it may be adaptive to inhibit them and conserve energy for physiological adjustments promoting survival.

    “In primitive organisms threats engage defensive reflexes (Walters & Erickson, 1986).”

    From Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience. (2016) · cites this paper as Frank, Watkins, & Maier, 2013

    The Introduction says that physically present threats produce defensive behaviors such as fleeing and fighting. It does not specify primitive organisms or defensive reflexes. Its discussion of energy costs concerns immune responses, not reflexes, and it does not say that unsuccessful reflexes are inhibited to conserve energy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Chronically elevated glucocorticoids can stimulate neuroinflammation by activating microglia, making the process self-perpetuating.

    “This process can become self-perpetuating because chronically elevated glucocorticoids can stimulate production of neuroinflammation by activating microglia (Frank et al., 2013; Nair and Bonneau, 2006), the resident immune cells of the brain.”
  • Glucocorticoids and catecholamines are primarily thought to be immunosuppressive and are used therapeutically for this purpose.

    “However, the well-studied mediators of stress physiology, glucocorticoids and catecholamines, are primarily thought to be immunosuppressive (Russell and Lightman, 2019) and used therapeutically for this purpose, creating a paradox that many have tried to resolve for over 30 years (Frank et al., 2013; Munck et al., 1984).”

    From Origin and function of stress-induced IL-6 in murine models (2020) · cites this paper as Frank et al., 2013

  • Noradrenaline and glucocorticoids mediate the effects of stress on neuroinflammatory processes.

    “A number of mediators of the stress response, most notably noradrenaline and glucocorticoids, have been found to mediate the effects of stress on neuroinflammatory processes (Frank et al, 2013;Wohleb et al, 2011).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frank, M. G., Watkins, L. R., & Maier, S. F.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Frank, Matthew G.
Venue
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
33
Pages
1-6
ISSN
0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025373842
Cited by
160
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (F32DA015591)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE021966)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
microglia, alarmins, threat detection, stress response, glucocorticoid feedback
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Central Nervous System, Disease Models, Animal, Glucocorticoids, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Neuroimmunomodulation, Signal Transduction, Oxidative Stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review