Cited by 119Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Sensitivity to interference and response contingencies in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Crone, Eveline A., Richard Jennings, J., Van Der Molen, Maurits W.·2003·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current theories on ADHD suggest executive and motivational deficits, but it remains unclear whether these are separate deficits or a unitary deficit. METHOD: ADHD children and matched controls performed on a hybrid disjunctive-choice reaction time task in which target stimuli could be surrounded by flankers signaling either the appropriate response, the competing response, or response inhibition. The task was performed under three conditions; reward only, reward and occasional punishment, and equal probability of reward and punishment. Heart rate and skin conductance measures were taken during task performance. RESULTS: Contrary to control children, ADHD children slowed their responses when flankers cueing the appropriate response surrounded the stimulus. Flankers cueing incorrect responses further slowed ADHD children relative to control children. ADHD children also responded less accurately under the threat of punishment. Phasic heart rate did not differ between groups, but immediate reward feedback induced greater heart rate responses in control than in ADHD children. Contrary to expectations, groups did not differ in skin conductance responses. CONCLUSIONS: ADHD children appear deficient in approach tendencies in the presence of imminent reward, rather than unresponsive to punishment or negative feedback. Executive inhibition and motivational inhibition seemed to exert separate effects on behavior of children with ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1469-7610.00115

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Crone et al. (2003) and Desman et al. (2008) found no group differences between ADHD and controls on SCRs during a go/no-go task under five different conditions of reinforcement or in response to different levels of punishment.

    “Conversely, two studies measuring relationships between inhibitory control and EDA (Crone et al., 2003;Desman et al., 2008) found no group differences between ADHD and controls on SCRs during a go/no-go task under five different conditions of reinforcement (Desman et al., 2008) or in response to different levels of punishment (Crone et al., 2003).”
  • Crone et al. (2003) found signs of reduced changes in HR in response to different reinforcement contingencies in ADHD.

    “Similarly, Crone et al. (2003) found signs of reduced changes in HR in response to different reinforcement contingencies in ADHD, suggesting that children with ADHD show a reduced ANS response to reinforcers.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crone, E. A., Richard Jennings, J., & Van Der Molen, M. W.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Crone, Eveline A.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-02
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
214-226
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2128279468
Cited by
119
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, response inhibition, flanker interference, punishment sensitivity, reward feedback, heart rate, skin conductance, approach tendencies, children
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Motivation, Punishment, Reaction Time, Reinforcement, Psychology, Task Performance and Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review