Cited by 109Embodied and Extended CognitionAction Observation and SynchronizationFree Will and Agency

Active inference as a theory of sentient behavior

Open access
Pezzulo, Giovanni, Parr, Thomas, Friston, Karl·2024·Biological Psychology

Abstract

This review paper offers an overview of the history and future of active inference-a unifying perspective on action and perception. Active inference is based upon the idea that sentient behavior depends upon our brains' implicit use of internal models to predict, infer, and direct action. Our focus is upon the conceptual roots and development of this theory of (basic) sentience and does not follow a rigid chronological narrative. We trace the evolution from Helmholtzian ideas on unconscious inference, through to a contemporary understanding of action and perception. In doing so, we touch upon related perspectives, the neural underpinnings of active inference, and the opportunities for future development. Key steps in this development include the formulation of predictive coding models and related theories of neuronal message passing, the use of sequential models for planning and policy optimization, and the importance of hierarchical (temporally) deep internal (i.e., generative or world) models. Active inference has been used to account for aspects of anatomy and neurophysiology, to offer theories of psychopathology in terms of aberrant precision control, and to unify extant psychological theories. We anticipate further development in all these areas and note the exciting early work applying active inference beyond neuroscience. This suggests a future not just in biology, but in robotics, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108741

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pezzulo, G., Parr, T., & Friston, K.
Affiliations
  • National Research Council (IT)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
Pezzulo, Giovanni
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-02
Volume
186
Pages
108741
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390562274
Cited by
109
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 1
FWCI
6.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (ACF-2023-13-013)
  • H2020 European Research Council (820213)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
active inference, sentience, perception and action, internal models, predictive coding, hierarchical generative models, precision control, psychopathology, artificial intelligence
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Brain, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review