Cited by 210Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAction Observation and SynchronizationPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Neuronal Prediction of Opponent’s Behavior during Cooperative Social Interchange in Primates

Open access
Haroush, Keren, Williams, Ziv M.·2015·Cell

Abstract

A cornerstone of successful social interchange is the ability to anticipate each other's intentions or actions. While generating these internal predictions is essential for constructive social behavior, their single neuronal basis and causal underpinnings are unknown. Here, we discover specific neurons in the primate dorsal anterior cingulate that selectively predict an opponent's yet unknown decision to invest in their common good or defect and distinct neurons that encode the monkey's own current decision based on prior outcomes. Mixed population predictions of the other was remarkably near optimal compared to behavioral decoders. Moreover, disrupting cingulate activity selectively biased mutually beneficial interactions between the monkeys but, surprisingly, had no influence on their decisions when no net-positive outcome was possible. These findings identify a group of other-predictive neurons in the primate anterior cingulate essential for enacting cooperative interactions and may pave a way toward the targeted treatment of social behavioral disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.045

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haroush, K., & Williams, Z. M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Haroush, Keren
  • Williams, Ziv M.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
160
Issue
6
Pages
1233-1245
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074387676
Cited by
210
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5
FWCI
10.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD059852, 5R01-HD059852)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, prediction of others' behavior, primate social behavior, social behavior disorders, theory of mind
MeSH terms
Animals, Cooperative Behavior, Decision Making, Gyrus Cinguli, Macaca mulatta, Male, Neurons, Psychological Tests, Reward, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review