Cited by 990Educational Games and GamificationDigital Games and MediaMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Towards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performance

Mekler, Elisa D., Brühlmann, Florian, Tuch, Alexandre N., Opwis, Klaus·2017·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.048

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

11 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mekler, E. D., Brühlmann, F., Tuch, A. N., & Opwis, K.
Affiliations
University of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Mekler, Elisa D.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
71
Pages
525-534
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1410719325
Cited by
990
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 115 · 2025: 102 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 137 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 16
FWCI
90.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
gamification, intrinsic motivation, points, levels, leaderboards, competence, performance, image annotation, extrinsic rewards

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review