Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,756

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring the credibility of online celebrities' Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users

Djafarova, Elmira, Rushworth, Chloe·2017·Computers in Human Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Bearden, 2001, Consumer self-confidence: Refinements in conceptualization and measurement, Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 121, 10.1086/321951 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bearden, 1989, Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence, Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 473, 10.1086/209186 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bearden, 1990, Further validation of the consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence scale, Advances in Consumer Research, 17, 770
  4. Bither, 1973, The self-confidence-advertising response relationship: A function of situational distraction, Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 146
  5. Chen, 2011, The role of marketing in social media: How online consumer reviews evolve, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25, 85, 10.1016/j.intmar.2011.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cheung, 2012, What drives consumers to spread electronic word of mouth in online consumer-opinion platforms?, Decision Support Systems, 53, 218, 10.1016/j.dss.2012.01.015 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Elberse, 2012, The economic value of celebrity endorsements, Journal of Advertising Research, 52, 149, 10.2501/JAR-52-2-149-165 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Erkan, 2015, Electronic word of mouth on instagram: Customers' engagements with brands in different sectors, International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics, 2, 1435
  9. Erkan, 2016, The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers' purchase intentions: An extended approach to information adoption, Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 47, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Farrokhi, 2012, Rethinking convenience sampling: Defining quality criteria, Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2, 784, 10.4304/tpls.2.4.784-792 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Gonzales, 2011, Mirror, mirror on my Facebook wall: Effects of Facebook exposure on self-esteem, Cyberpsychology, Behaviour, and Social Networking, 14, 79, 10.1089/cyber.2009.0411 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Jin, 2014, Following celebrities' Tweets about brands: The impact of Twitter-based electronic word-of-mouth on consumers' source credibility perception, buying intention, and social identification with celebrities, Journal of Advertising, 43, 181, 10.1080/00913367.2013.827606 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Keller, 2005, Choosing the right brand elements and leveraging secondary associations will help marketers build brand equity, Marketing Management, 14, 10
  14. Khan, 2006, Licensing effect in consumer choice, Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 259, 10.1509/jmkr.43.2.259 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Klein, 2004, Corporate social responsibility and consumers' attributions and brand evaluations in a product–harm crisis, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 203, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Kropp, 2006, Values and self-esteem, Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, 7, 14
  17. Kropp, 2005, Values and collective self-esteem as predictors of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence among university students, International Marketing Review, 22, 7, 10.1108/02651330510581154 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Moore, 2010, The other side of the story: New perspectives on word of mouth, Advances in Consumer Research, 37, 98
  19. Nicolau, 2013, Communicating excellence in innovation, Economics Letters, 118, 87, 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.09.025 · DOI
  20. Podoshen, 2012, An Examination of the relationships between materialism, conspicuous consumption, impulse buying, and brand loyalty, The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20, 319, 10.2753/MTP1069-6679200306 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Reichelt, 2014, How credibility affects eWOM reading: The influences of expertise, trustworthiness, and similarity on utilitarian and social functions, Journal of Marketing Communications, 20, 65, 10.1080/13527266.2013.797758 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Rhodes, 1992, Self-esteem and intelligence affect influenceability: The mediating role of message reception, Psychological Bulletin, 111, 156, 10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.156 · DOI
  23. Scott, 2015, 'Instafamous' teen reveals social media's ugly truth, ABC News
  24. Seno, 2007, The equity effect of product endorsement by celebrities, European Journal of Marketing, 41, 121, 10.1108/03090560710718148 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Sheldon, 2016, Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age, Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 89, 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.059 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Smith, 2010, Consumer perceptions of corporate social responsibility: The CSR Halo Effect, SSRN Electronic Journal, 1
  27. Spry, 2011, Celebrity endorsement, brand credibility and brand equity, European Journal of Marketing, 45, 882, 10.1108/03090561111119958 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Teng, 2014, Examining the antecedents of persuasive eWOM messages in social media, Online Information Review, 38, 746, 10.1108/OIR-04-2014-0089 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Thorndike, 1920, A constant error in psychological ratings, Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 25, 10.1037/h0071663 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Thoumrungroje, 2014, The influence of social media intensity and EWOM on conspicuous consumption, Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 148, 7, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.009 · DOI
  31. Townsend, 2015, Woman tries to gain Instagram fame by recreating celebrity images, Mail Online
  32. Valkenburg, 2006, Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem, CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 584, 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.584 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Van Norel, 2014, Damaged corporate reputation: Can celebrity Tweets repair it?, Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 308, 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.056 · DOI
  34. Vizard, 2015, Instagram at 5: Turning marketing momentum into a billion-dollar ad business, Marketing Week, 1
  35. Vizard, 2015, What brands need to know about Instagram marketing?, Marketing Week, 2
  36. Wilcox, 2011, Indulgence or self-control: A dual process model of the effect of incidental pride on indulgent choice, Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 151, 10.1086/657606 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Wilcox, 2013, Are close friends the enemy? online social networks, self-esteem, and self-Control, Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 90, 10.1086/668794 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Wiley, 2014, Why brands should turn to bloggers instead of celebrity spokespeople, Marketing Land

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
68
Pages
1-7
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009
OpenAlex
W2550156300
Cited by
1,756
References
5
FWCI
114.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.