Cited by 108Body Composition Measurement TechniquesSports Performance and TrainingThermoregulation and physiological responses

Estimation of total body water and extracellular water with bioimpedance in athletes: A need for athlete-specific prediction models

Matias, Catarina N., Santos, Diana A., Júdice, Pedro B., Magalhães, João P., Minderico, Cláudia S., Fields, David A., Lukaski, Henry C., Sardinha, Luís B. +1 more·2016·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Purpose Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) equations can predict total body water (TBW) and extracellular water (ECW) in non-athletic healthy populations. This study aimed: a) to develop BIA-based models for TBW and ECW prediction based on dilution methods in a sample of national level athletes; and b) to validate the new models with a cross-validation approach in a separate cohort using dilution methods as criterion. Methods Two hundred and eight highly trained athletes (21.3 ± 5.0 years) were evaluated during their respective competitive seasons. Athletes were randomly split into development (n = 139) and validation groups (n = 69). The criterion method for TBW was deuterium dilution and for ECW was bromide dilution, where ICW was the respective difference between both. Resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) were obtained with a phase-sensitive 50 kHz BIA device and used for the estimation of TBW and ECW. Results Athletic BIA-based models were developed for TBW and ECW [TBW = 0.286 + 0.195*S(2)/R + 0.385*Wt + 5.086*Sex; ECW = 1.579 + 0.055*S(2)/R + 0.127*Wt + 0.006*S(2)/Xc + 0.932*Sex, where sex is 0 if female or 1 if male, Wt is weight (kg), S is stature (cm), and R and Xc are in ohm (Ω)]. Cross validation revealed R(2) of 0.91 for TBW and R(2) 0.70 for ECW and no mean bias. Conclusions The new equations can be considered valid, with no observed bias, thus affording practical means to quantify TBW and ECW in national level athletes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.03.013

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matias, C. N., Santos, D. A., Júdice, P. B., Magalhães, J. P., Minderico, C. S., Fields, D. A., Lukaski, H. C., Sardinha, L. B., & Silva, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
  • University of North Dakota (US)
Corresponding author
Silva, Analiza M.
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
468-474
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071155160
Cited by
108
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Keywords
total body water, extracellular water, bioelectrical impedance analysis, athletes, deuterium dilution, bromide dilution, intracellular water, resistance and reactance
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Body Composition, Body Water, Body Weight, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review