Cited by 44Body Composition Measurement TechniquesElectrical and Bioimpedance TomographyObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Validity of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis to Estimation Fat-Free Mass in the Army Cadets

Open access
Langer, Raquel, Borges, Juliano, Pascoa, Mauro, Cirolini, Vagner, Guerra-Júnior, Gil, Gonçalves, Ezequiel·2016·Nutrients

Abstract

Background: Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) is a fast, practical, non-invasive, and frequently used method for fat-free mass (FFM) estimation. The aims of this study were to validate predictive equations of BIA to FFM estimation in Army cadets and to develop and validate a specific BIA equation for this population. Methods: A total of 396 males, Brazilian Army cadets, aged 17–24 years were included. The study used eight published predictive BIA equations, a specific equation in FFM estimation, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a reference method. Student’s t-test (for paired sample), linear regression analysis, and Bland–Altman method were used to test the validity of the BIA equations. Results: Predictive BIA equations showed significant differences in FFM compared to DXA (p < 0.05) and large limits of agreement by Bland–Altman. Predictive BIA equations explained 68% to 88% of FFM variance. Specific BIA equations showed no significant differences in FFM, compared to DXA values. Conclusion: Published BIA predictive equations showed poor accuracy in this sample. The specific BIA equations, developed in this study, demonstrated validity for this sample, although should be used with caution in samples with a large range of FFM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu8030121

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langer, R., Borges, J., Pascoa, M., Cirolini, V., Guerra-Júnior, G., & Gonçalves, E.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
  • Growth and Development Laboratory, Center for Investigation in Pediatrics (CIPED), School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas-SP 13083-887, Brazil
Corresponding author
Langer, Raquel
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2016-03-11
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
121
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2295171648
Cited by
44
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6
FWCI
5.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
bioelectrical impedance analysis, prediction equations, equation validation, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, army cadets, young men, body composition
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Body Composition, Brazil, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Male, Military Personnel, Models, Biological, Predictive Value of Tests, Sex Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Absorptiometry, Photon, Linear Models, Electric Impedance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review