Cited by 197Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentEarly Childhood Education and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 5 of the 72 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

The neuroscience of emotion regulation development: implications for education

Open access
Martin, Rebecca E, Ochsner, Kevin N·2016·Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

Emotion regulation is a critical life skill that can facilitate learning and improve educational outcomes. Developmental studies find that the ability to regulate emotion improves with age. In neuroimaging studies, emotion regulation abilities are associated with recruitment of a set of prefrontal brain regions involved in cognitive control and executive functioning that mature late in development. In this review we discuss the regulation of both negative and positive emotions, the role of other people in guiding our emotional responses, and the potential applications of this work to education.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that emotion regulation is a critical life skill for learning, supported by prefrontal cognitive-control systems that mature slowly relative to subcortical affective systems. It synthesizes developmental neuroscience findings on negative and positive emotion regulation and social regulation, then suggests educational applications.

Key findings

  • Reappraisal modulates affective regions including the amygdala, ventral striatum, and insula via a prefrontal-parietal network including dlPFC, PPC, vlPFC, mPFC, and ACC; this network overlaps with general cognitive control.
  • For negative emotions, the behavioral ability to down-regulate, decrease amygdala activation, and increase lateral prefrontal activity tracks with age, and amygdala-prefrontal functional connectivity also increases with age.
  • For positive emotions and rewards, children may be especially responsive: in one study, all age groups performed better with positive feedback, and this trend was largest for 8–9 year olds, who showed greater dlPFC and parietal activation during positive versus negative feedback, whereas adults showed the reverse.
  • Social context matters: caregiver presence decreased risky choices and increased vlPFC/mPFC activation while decreasing ventral striatum and amygdala activation in adolescents; peer presence increased risky decision making and ventral striatum/vlPFC activation.

Methods

  • Narrative review of developmental neuroscience and behavioral studies on emotion regulation, including reappraisal, reward processing, feedback learning, and social regulation.
  • No primary data or sample are reported; the paper synthesizes cited neuroimaging and behavioral findings across childhood, adolescence, and adulthood.
  • Main analysis is qualitative synthesis rather than systematic review or meta-analysis; it cites a separate meta-analysis of 48 emotion-regulation studies but does not conduct one.

Limitations

  • Paper-stated: only a handful of studies have examined negative emotion regulation in children versus adults; developmental neuroimaging studies testing positive-emotion hypotheses have yet to be done; no imaging studies directly examine how other people help us reappraise across development or in adults; the imbalance theory may oversimplify complex cognition-emotion interactions; more studies on cortical-subcortical maturational patterns are needed.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not report a systematic search strategy, inclusion criteria, or quality appraisal, and its conclusions depend on the cited literature rather than new empirical data.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.06.006

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

39 Not checked yet · 20 Own interpretation · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Mixed support · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 67 references — free account

Show all 31 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 27
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 9
33 of 33
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Emotion regulation abilities can be improved through training or intervention in educational settings.

    “At the classroom level, training students on emotion regulation strategies (e.g. distancing, mindfulness, reinterpretation of negative scenarios – for examples see references [33–36]) could be an effective intervention approach particularly for individuals or populations exposed to situations of high stress and adversity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Neural measures of emotion regulation in laboratory tasks are relevant to real-world classroom learning and behavior.

    “Importantly, these data could be leveraged to influence curricula and policy (Figure 2).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The developmental trajectory of emotion regulation observed in lab tasks reflects how students regulate emotions in educational settings.

    “understanding how students regulate (or fail to regulate) emotions given their developmental stage and background can help educators better scaffold and manage their classrooms to enhance learning and successful student outcomes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Positive feedback and rewards in the classroom operate similarly to lab reward stimuli and can be regulated by the same strategies.

    “because positive emotions, feedback, and rewards may facilitate better learning, using regulation strategies to enhance positive emotions could be an effective approach in educational settings.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The capacity to regulate emotion is key to promoting and maintaining emotional states that foster optimal learning.

    “The capacity to regulate emotion may be key in this regard.”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 56 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Silvers, 2014, Concurrent and lasting effects of emotion regulation on amygdala response in adolescence and young adulthood, Dev Sci

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Martin, R. E., & Ochsner, K. N.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Martin, Rebecca E
  • Ochsner, Kevin N
Venue
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
10
Pages
142-148
ISSN
2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2469119618
Cited by
197
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag043463-05)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01-AG043463)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH107119)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD069178)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
emotion regulation, prefrontal cortex, executive function, cognitive control, brain maturation, negative emotions, positive emotions, learning, educational outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review