Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 617

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research

Brinson, James R.·2015·Computers & Education
DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.003

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 136

  1. Abdulwahed, 2013, Developing the TriLab, a triple access mode (hands-on, virtual, remote) laboratory, of a process control rig using LabVIEW and Joomla, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 21, 614, 10.1002/cae.20506 · DOI
  2. Akpan, 2010, Which comes first: the use of computer simulation of frog dissection or conventional dissection as academic exercise?, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 29, 113
  3. Albu, 2004, Embedding remote experimentation in power engineering education, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 19, 139, 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.821020 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2003.821020
  4. Barbeau, 2013, The development and assessment of an online microscopic anatomy laboratory course, Anatomical Sciences Education, 6, 246, 10.1002/ase.1347 · DOI
  5. Barnard, 1985, Experience with low cost laboratory data, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 13, 91
  6. Baser, 2010, The effectiveness of computer supported versus real laboratory inquiry learning environments on the understanding of direct current electricity among pre-service elementary school teachers, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6, 47, 10.12973/ejmste/75227 · DOI
  7. Basey, 2008, Optimal science lab design: Impacts of various components of lab design on students' attitudes toward lab, International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2, 1, 10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020115 · doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020115
  8. Bates, 1978, The role of the laboratory in secondary school science programs, Vol. 1, 55
  9. Braun, 2008, Improved learning efficiency and increased student collaboration through use of virtual microscopy in the teaching of human pathology, Anatomical Sciences Education, 1, 240, 10.1002/ase.53 · DOI
  10. Bruner, 1961, The act of discovery, Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21
  11. Cameron, 2003, The effectiveness of simulation in a hybrid and on-line networking course, TechTrends, 47, 18, 10.1007/BF02763200 · DOI
  12. Canfora, 2004, Remotely accessible laboratory for electronic measurement teaching, Computer Standards and Interfaces, 26, 489, 10.1016/j.csi.2004.03.001 · doi:10.1016/j.csi.2004.03.001
  13. Cañizares, 1997, Advantages and disadvantages of using various computer tools in electrical engineering courses, IEEE Transactions on Education, 40, 166, 10.1109/13.618025 · doi:10.1109/13.618025
  14. Carr, 2000, Science instructors ask: can you teach students at a distance how to use microscopes?, Chronicle of Higher Education, 46
  15. Chan, 2009, Evaluating learning experiences in virtual laboratory training through student perceptions: a case study in electrical and electronic engineering at the University of Hong Kong, Engineering Education, 4, 70, 10.11120/ened.2009.04020070 · doi:10.11120/ened.2009.04020070
  16. Chappell, 1998, The challenge of communicating science to the public, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 44, B7
  17. Chini, 2012, Exploration of factors that affect the comparative effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives in an undergraduate laboratory, Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 8, 1, 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010113 · DOI
  18. Climent-Bellido, 2003, Learning in chemistry with virtual laboratories, Journal of Chemical Education, 80, 346, 10.1021/ed080p346 · DOI
  19. Collier, 2012, Optical versus virtual: teaching assistant perceptions of the use of virtual microscopy in an undergraduate human anatomy course, Anatomical Sciences Education, 5, 10, 10.1002/ase.262 · DOI
  20. Cooper, 2005, Remote laboratories in teaching and learning – issues impinging on widespread adoption in science and engineering education, International Journal of Online Engineering, 1, 1
  21. Cooper, 2015, A call for virtual experiments: accelerating the scientific process, Progress in Physics and Molecular Biology, 117, 99, 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.10.001 · DOI
  22. Corter, 2011, Process and learning outcomes from remotely-operated, simulated, and hands-on student laboratories, Computers and Education, 57, 2054, 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.009 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Crandall, 2015, A comparison of the degree of student satisfaction using a simulation or a traditional wet lab to teach physical properties of ice, Journal of Food Science Education, 14, 24, 10.1111/1541-4329.12049 · doi:10.1111/1541-4329.12049
  24. Darrah, 2014, Are virtual labs as effective as hands-on labs for undergraduate physics? A comparative study at two major universities, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 803, 10.1007/s10956-014-9513-9 · DOI
  25. Deslauriers, 2011, Learning and retention of quantum concepts with different teaching methods, Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 7, 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.010101 · DOI
  26. Dewhurst, 2000, Independent student learning aided by computers: an acceptable alternative to lectures?, Computers and Education, 35, 223, 10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00033-6 · DOI
  27. Dibiase, 2000, Is distance teaching more work or less work?, American Journal of Distance Education, 14, 6, 10.1080/08923640009527061 · DOI
  28. Dobson, 2009, Evaluation of the virtual physiology of exercise laboratory program, Advances in Physiology Education, 33, 335, 10.1152/advan.00040.2009 · DOI
  29. Elawaday, 2009, Educational objectives of different laboratory types: a comparative study, International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, 6, 89
  30. Engum, 2003, Intravenous catheter training system: computer-based education versus traditional learning methods, The American Journal of Surgery, 186, 67, 10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00109-0 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Ertugrul, 1998, New era in engineering experiments: an integrated and interactive teaching/learning approach, and real-time visualizations, International Journal of Engineering Education, 14, 344
  32. Evans, 2008, A cognitive framework for the analysis of online chemistry courses, Journal of Science and Education Technology, 17, 100, 10.1007/s10956-007-9087-x · DOI
  33. Eylon, 1988, Learning and instruction: an examination of four research perspectives in science education, Review of Educational Research, 58, 251, 10.3102/00346543058003251 · doi:10.3102/00346543058003251 · Paper page
  34. Farrokhnia, 2010, A study on the impact of real, virtual and comprehensive experimenting on students' conceptual understanding of DC electric circuits and their skills in undergraduate electricity laboratory, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 5474, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.893 · DOI
  35. Finkelstein, 2005, When learning about the real world is better done virtually: a study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment, Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 1, 010103, 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.1.010103 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Finkelstein, 2006, Hightech tools for teaching physics: the physics education technology project, MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2, 110
  37. Finn, 2002, Why does experimentation matter in teaching ecology?, Journal of Biological Education, 36, 158, 10.1080/00219266.2002.9655826 · doi:10.1080/00219266.2002.9655826
  38. Flowers, 2011, Investigating the effectiveness of virtual laboratories in an undergraduate biology course, The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 7, 110
  39. Ford, 2000, Effects of time scale focus on system understanding in decision support systems, Simulation and Gaming, 31, 309, 10.1177/104687810003100301 · DOI
  40. Forinash, 2001, The viability of distance education science laboratories, T.H.E. Journal Online, 29
  41. Forinash, 2005, Building real laboratories on the internet, International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 15, 56, 10.1504/IJCEELL.2005.006792 · doi:10.1504/ijceell.2005.006792
  42. Frederick, 2013, Comparison of student outcomes between computer-based simulated and hands-on lab environments, International Journal of University Teaching and Faculty Development, 4, 1
  43. García-Zubía, 2009, Acceptance, usability and usefulness of WebLab-Deusto from the students point of view, International Journal of Online Engineering, 5, 9, 10.3991/ijoe.v5i1.817 · doi:10.3991/ijoe.v5i1.817
  44. Gilman, 2006, Do online labs work? An assessment of an online lab on cell division, The American Biology Teacher, 68, 131
  45. Gröber, 2007, Experimenting from a distance remotely controlled laboratory, European Journal of Physics, 28, S127, 10.1088/0143-0807/28/3/S12 · doi:10.1088/0143-0807/28/3/s12
  46. Gustavsson, 2009, On objectives of instructional laboratories, individual assessment, and use of collaborative remote laboratories, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2, 263, 10.1109/TLT.2009.42 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Harris, 1996, Advancing asynchronous distance education using high speed networks, IEEE Transactions on Education, 39, 444, 10.1109/13.538771 · doi:10.1109/13.538771
  48. Hawkins, 2013, Virtual laboratory vs. traditional laboratory: which is more effective for teaching electrochemistry?, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 516, 10.1039/C3RP00070B · DOI
  49. Herga, 2012, Virtual laboratory in chemistry – experimental study of understanding, reproduction and application of acquired knowledge of subject's chemical content, Organizacija, 45, 108, 10.2478/v10051-012-0011-7 · DOI
  50. Hofstein, 2004, The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century, Science Education, 88, 28, 10.1002/sce.10106 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Hofstein, 2007, The laboratory in science education: the state of the art, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8, 105, 10.1039/B7RP90003A · DOI · Paper page
  52. Huppert, 2002, Computer simulations in the high school: students' cognitive stages, science process skills and academic achievement in microbiology, International Journal of Science Education, 24, 803, 10.1080/09500690110049150 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Husmann, 2009, Quantitative and qualitative changes in teaching histology by means of virtual microscopy in an introductory course in human anatomy, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2, 218, 10.1002/ase.105 · DOI
  54. Jaakkola, 2011, A comparison of students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits in simulation only and simulation-laboratory contexts, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 71, 10.1002/tea.20386 · DOI · Paper page
  55. de Jong, 2013, Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education, Science, 340, 305, 10.1126/science.1230579 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Josephsen, 2006, Simulation of laboratory assignments to support students' learning of introductory inorganic chemistry, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7, 266, 10.1039/B6RP90013E · DOI
  57. Kagan, 1989, The structural approach to cooperative learning, Educational Leadership, 47, 12
  58. Kang, 2005, Secondary science teachers' professional knowledge of laboratory activities: linking epistemologies, beliefs, and teaching practices, Science Education, 89, 140, 10.1002/sce.20013 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Keller, 2005, Making real virtual labs, The Science Education Review, 4, 2
  60. Kennepohl, 2005, Remote access to instrumental analysis for distance education in science, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 6, 10.19173/irrodl.v6i3.260 · DOI
  61. Klahr, 2007, Hands on what? The relative effectiveness of physical versus virtual materials in an engineering design project by middle school children, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 183, 10.1002/tea.20152 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Koballa, 1997, The spectrum of scientific literacy, The Science Teacher, 64, 27
  63. Kolloffel, 2013, Conceptual understanding about electrical circuits in secondary vocational engineering education: combining traditional instruction with inquiry learning in a virtual lab, Journal of Engineering Education, 102, 375, 10.1002/jee.20022 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Korzenny, 1978, A theory of electronic propinquity: mediated communications in organizations, Communication Research, 5, 3, 10.1177/009365027800500101 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Krippendorf, 2005, Complete and rapid switch from light microscopy to virtual microscopy for teaching medical histology, The Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist, 285B, 19, 10.1002/ar.b.20066 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Lang, 2012, Comparative study of hands-on and remote physics labs for first year university level physics students, Transformative Dialogues: Teaching and Learning Journal, 6, 1
  67. Lang, 2007, Pedagogical evaluation of remote laboratories in eMerge project, European Journal of Engineering Education, 32, 57, 10.1080/03043790601055626 · DOI
  68. Livshitz, 1998, Teaching mechatronics in a mechanical engineering department, European Journal of Engineering Education, 23, 353, 10.1080/03043799808923512 · doi:10.1080/03043799808923512
  69. Magin, 2000, Engineering students' understanding of the role of experimentation, European Journal of Engineering Education, 25, 351, 10.1080/03043790050200395 · DOI
  70. Mahendran, 1998, Use of advanced technology videotapes in the delivery of structural engineering course, European Journal of Engineering Education, 23, 327, 10.1080/03043799808923510 · doi:10.1080/03043799808923510
  71. Ma, 2006, Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: a comparative literature review, ACM Computing Surveys, 38, 1, 10.1145/1132960.1132961 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Marques, 2014, How remote labs impact on course outcomes: Various practices using VISIR, IEEE Transactions on Education, 57, 151, 10.1109/TE.2013.2284156 · DOI
  73. McAteer, 1996, Simulation software in a life sciences practical laboratory, Computers and Education, 26, 102
  74. McElhaney, 2011, Investigations of a complex, realistic task: intentional, unsystematic, and exhaustive experimenters, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 745, 10.1002/tea.20423 · DOI
  75. Mickle, 2008, Development of a laboratory course in nonmajors general biology for distance education, Journal of College Science Teaching, 37, 35
  76. Morgil, 2008, The effect of web-based project applications on students' attitudes towards chemistry, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8
  77. Muster, 1989, Engineering design as it moves from an art to a science: Its impact on the education process, International Journal of Applied Engineering Education, 5, 239
  78. Myneni, 2013, An interactive and intelligent learning system for physics education, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 6, 228, 10.1109/TLT.2013.26 · DOI
  79. Nickerson, 2007, A model for evaluating the effectiveness of remote engineering laboratories and simulations in education, Computers and Education, 49, 708, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.019 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Oloruntegbe, 2010, Evaluation of 3D environments and virtual realities in science teaching and learning: the need to go beyond perception referents, Scientific Research and Essays, 5, 948
  81. Olympiou, 2012, Blending physical and virtual manipulatives: an effort to improve students' conceptual understanding through science laboratory experimentation, Science Education, 96, 21, 10.1002/sce.20463 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Olympiou, 2013, Making the invisible visible: enhancing students’conceptual understanding by introducing representations of abstract objects in a simulation, Instructional Science, 41, 575, 10.1007/s11251-012-9245-2 · DOI · Paper page
  83. Olympiou, 2008, Effects of physical and virtual experimentation on students' conceptual understanding in heat and temperature, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 1021, 10.1002/tea.20260 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Orbach, 1979, Simulation games and motivation for learning: a theoretical framework, Simulation and Games, 10, 3, 10.1177/0037550079101001 · doi:10.1177/0037550079101001
  85. Ottander, 2006, Laboratory work: the teachers' perspective, Journal of Biological Education, 40, 113, 10.1080/00219266.2006.9656027 · DOI
  86. Parush, 2002, Learning histories in simulation-based teaching: the effects on self-learning and transfer, Computers and Education, 39, 319, 10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00043-X · DOI
  87. Pickering, 1980, Are lab courses a waste of time?, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 19, 80
  88. Polly, 2015, Evaluation of an adaptive virtual laboratory environment using Western Blotting for diagnosis of disease, BMC Medical Education, 14, 1
  89. Pyatt, 2012, Virtual and physical experimentation in inquiry-based science labs: attitudes, performance, and access, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 133, 10.1007/s10956-011-9291-6 · DOI · Paper page
  90. Raineri, 2001, Virtual laboratories enhance traditional undergraduate biology laboratories, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 29, 160, 10.1016/S1470-8175(01)00060-1 · doi:10.1016/s1470-8175(01)00060-1
  91. Rajendran, 2010, A study on the effectiveness of virtual lab in e-learning, International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, 2, 2173
  92. Reischl, 2015, Use of robotic controls in ergonomics laboratories, Sigurnost, 57, 35
  93. Stefanovic, 2015, An assessment of distance learning laboratory objectives for control engineering education, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 23, 191, 10.1002/cae.21589 · doi:10.1002/cae.21589
  94. Renken, 2013, Computer simulations and clear observations do not guarantee conceptual understanding, Learning and Instruction, 23, 10, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.08.006 · DOI
  95. Reuter, 2009, Online versus in the classroom: student success in a hands-on lab class, American Journal of Distance Education, 23, 151, 10.1080/08923640903080620 · DOI
  96. Ronen, 2000, Simulation – a bridge between theory and reality: the case of electric circuits, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 14, 10.1046/j.1365-2729.2000.00112.x · DOI · Paper page
  97. Satterthwait, 2010, Why are ‘hands-on’ science activities so effective for student learning?, Teaching Science—The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 56, 7
  98. Scanlon, 2002, Contemporary approaches to learning science: technologically-mediated practical work, Studies in Science Education, 38, 73, 10.1080/03057260208560188 · DOI
  99. Schauer, 2008, Real remote physics experiments across internet-inherent part of integrated E-learning, International Journal of Online Engineering, 1, 52
  100. Schuemie, 2001, Research on presence in virtual reality: a survey, CyberPsychology and Behavior, 4, 183, 10.1089/109493101300117884 · DOI · Paper page
  101. Scoville, 2007, Traditional and virtual microscopy compared experimentally in a classroom setting, Clinical Anatomy, 20, 565, 10.1002/ca.20440 · DOI
  102. Sehati, 2000, Re-engineering the practical laboratory session, International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 37, 86, 10.7227/IJEEE.37.1.8 · doi:10.7227/ijeee.37.1.8
  103. Selvaduray, 1995, Undergraduate engineering ceramics laboratory development, International Journal of Engineering Education, 11, 374
  104. Shachar, 2010, Twenty years of research on the academic performance differences between traditional and distance learning: summative meta-analysis and trend examination, MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6, 318
  105. Simonson, 1999, Theory and distance education: a new discussion, American Journal of Distance Education, 13, 60, 10.1080/08923649909527014 · DOI · Paper page
  106. Slavin, 1989, Research on cooperative learning: consensus and controversy, Educational Leadership, 47, 52
  107. Srinivasan, 2006, Reality versus simulation, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15, 137, 10.1007/s10956-006-9007-5 · DOI
  108. Stuckey-Mickell, 2007, Virtual labs in the online biology course: student perceptions of effectiveness and usability, MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3, 105
  109. Stull, 2013, Usability of concrete and virtual models in chemistry instruction, Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2546, 10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.012 · DOI
  110. Sun, 2008, A study on learning effect among different learning styles in web-based lab of science for elementary school students, Computers and Education, 50, 1411, 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  111. Swan, 2009, The contribution of a virtual biology laboratory to college students' learning, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 405, 10.1080/14703290903301735 · DOI
  112. Taghavi, 2009, Computer simulation laboratory instruction vs. traditional laboratory instruction in digital electronics, Journal of Information Technology Impact, 9, 25
  113. Tarekegn, 2009, Can computer simulations substitute real laboratory apparatus?, Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 3, 506
  114. Tatli, 2009, Computer based education: online learning and teaching facilities, Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 1, 171
  115. Tatli, 2012, Virtual chemistry laboratory: effect of constructivist learning environment, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13
  116. Tatli, 2013, Effect of a virtual chemistry laboratory on students' achievement, Educational Technology & Society, 16, 159
  117. Tawfik, 2015, Novel design and development of advanced remote electronics experiments, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 23, 327, 10.1002/cae.21602 · doi:10.1002/cae.21602
  118. Tobin, 1990, Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning, School Science and Mathematics, 90, 403, 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb17229.x · DOI · Paper page
  119. Toth, 2009, Designing blended inquiry learning in a laboratory context: a study of incorporating hands-on and virtual laboratories, Innovative Higher Education, 33, 333, 10.1007/s10755-008-9087-7 · DOI
  120. Trindade, 2002, Science learning in virtual environments: a descriptive study, British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 1, 10.1111/1467-8535.00283 · DOI · Paper page
  121. Triona, 2003, Point and click or grab and heft: comparing the influence of physical and virtual instructional materials on elementary school students' ability to design experiments, Cognition and Instruction, 21, 149, 10.1207/S1532690XCI2102_02 · DOI · Paper page
  122. Trundle, 2010, The use of a computer simulation to promote conceptual change: a quasi-experimental study, Computers and Education, 54, 1078, 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.012 · DOI · Paper page
  123. Tuysuz, 2010, The effect of the virtual laboratory on students' achievement and attitude in chemistry, International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2, 37
  124. Tzafestas, 2006, Virtual and remote robotic laboratory: comparative experimental evaluation, IEEE Transactions on Education, 49, 360, 10.1109/TE.2006.879255 · DOI · Paper page
  125. Vaidyanathan, 1998, An exploratory investigation of computer simulations, student preferences, and performance, Journal of Education for Business, 73, 144, 10.1080/08832329809603819 · doi:10.1080/08832329809603819
  126. Wicker, 2000, A vision-based experiment for mechanical engineering laboratory courses, International Journal of Engineering Education, 16, 193
  127. Williams, 1992, Can experimentation courses save engineering laboratory work from extinction?, Research and Development in Higher Education, 15, 420
  128. Winn, 2006, Learning oceanography from a computer simulation compared with direct experience at sea, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 25, 10.1002/tea.20097 · DOI
  129. Yang, 2007, The impact of internet virtual physics laboratory instruction on the achievement in physics, science process skills and computer attitudes of 10th grade students, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 451, 10.1007/s10956-007-9062-6 · DOI
  130. Zacharia, 2007, Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort to enhance students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 120, 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00215.x · DOI · Paper page
  131. Zacharia, 2008, Comparing the influence of physical and virtual manipulatives in the context of the physics by inquiry curriculum: the case of undergraduate students' conceptual understanding of heat and temperature, American Journal of Physics, 76, 425, 10.1119/1.2885059 · DOI
  132. Zacharia, 2012, Is physicality an important aspect of learning through science experimentation among kindergarten students?, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 447, 10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.02.004 · DOI
  133. Zacharia, 2015, Identifying potential types of guidance for supporting student inquiry when using virtual and remote labs in science: a literature review, Educational Technology Research and Development, 63, 257, 10.1007/s11423-015-9370-0 · DOI · Paper page
  134. Zacharia, 2011, Physical versus virtual manipulative experimentation in physics learning, Learning and Instruction, 21, 317, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  135. Zacharia, 2008, Effects of experimenting with physical and virtual manipulatives on students' conceptual understanding in heat and temperature, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 1021, 10.1002/tea.20260 · DOI · Paper page
  136. Zhang, 2011, Can generating representations enhance learning with dynamic visualizations?, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1177, 10.1002/tea.20443 · DOI

Cited by

See all 617

Metadata

Authors
Brinson, J. R.
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
87
Pages
218-237
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.003
OpenAlex
W2308784110
Cited by
617
References
6
FWCI
40.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.003
The paper
Brinson, J. R. (2015). Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.