Cited by 179Neural dynamics and brain functionSchizophrenia research and treatmentFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Dysconnectivity, large-scale networks and neuronal dynamics in schizophrenia

Uhlhaas, Peter J·2013·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

Schizophrenia remains a daunting challenge for efforts aimed at identifying fundamental pathophysiological processes and to develop evidence-based effective treatments and interventions. One reason for the lack of progress lies in the fact that the pathophysiology of schizophrenia has been predominantly conceived in terms of circumscribed alterations in cellular and anatomical variables. In the current review, it is proposed that this approach needs to be complemented by a focus on the neuronal dynamics in large-scale networks which is compatible with the notion of dysconnectivity, highlighting the involvement of both reduced and increased interactions in extended cortical circuits in schizophrenia. Neural synchrony is one candidate mechanisms for achieving functional connectivity in large-scale networks and has been found to be impaired in schizophrenia. Importantly, alterations in the synchronization of neural oscillations can be related to dysfunctions in the excitation-inhibition (E/I)-balance and developmental modifications with important implications for translational research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2012.11.004

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Malfunctioning synaptic communication inside and across brain regions may produce schizophrenia symptoms by disrupting cognitive and perceptual circuitry.

    “the symptoms associated with schizophrenia may arise from a malfunctioning synaptic communication within and between brain regions, leading to a functional disruption of the circuitry that underlies many of the cognitive and perceptive functions (Uhlhaas, 2013)”

    From Perineuronal nets and schizophrenia: The importance of neuronal coatings (2014) · cites this paper as Uhlhaas, 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uhlhaas, P. J.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Uhlhaas, Peter J
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
283-290
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068181401
Cited by
178
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 11
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Max-Planck Society
  • LOEWE Grant ‘Neuronale Koordination Forschungsschwerpunkt Frankfurt’
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
schizophrenia, dysconnectivity, large-scale brain networks, neural dynamics, neuronal synchronization, neural oscillations, functional connectivity, excitation-inhibition balance, cortical circuits
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Nerve Net, Neurons, Schizophrenia, Nonlinear Dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review