Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analyzing electronic word of mouth: A social commerce construct

Ahmad, Shimi Naurin, Laroche, Michel·2017·International Journal of Information Management
DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.08.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.08.004

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Ahmad, 2015, How do expressed emotions affect the helpfulness of a product review? Evidence from reviews using Latent Semantic Analysis, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20, 76, 10.1080/10864415.2016.1061471 · DOI
  2. Andreasen, 1976, Factors affecting consumer’s uses of information sources, Journal of Business Research, 4, 197, 10.1016/0148-2963(76)90023-0 · doi:10.1016/0148-2963(76)90023-0
  3. Baek, 2012, Helpfulness of consumer reviews: Readers objective and review cues, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17, 99, 10.2753/JEC1086-4415170204 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Basuroy, 2003, How critical are critical reviews? The box office effects of film critics, star power, and budgets, Journal of Marketing, 67, 103, 10.1509/jmkg.67.4.103.18692 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Berger, 2013, Communications channel and word of mouth: How the medium shapes the message, Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 567, 10.1086/671345 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Berry, 1995, Using linear algebra for intelligent information retrieval, SIAM Review, 37, 573, 10.1137/1037127 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Campbell, 2011, Understanding consumer conversations around ads in a Web 2.0 world, Journal of Advertising, 40, 87, 10.2753/JOA0091-3367400106 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Campo, 2004, Social norms and expectancy violation theories: Assessing the effectiveness of health communication campaigns, Communication Monographs, 71, 448, 10.1080/0363452042000307498 · DOI
  9. Cao, 2011, Exploring determinants of voting for the helpfulness of online user reviews: A text mining approach, Decision Support Systems, 51, 511, 10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.009 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Casaló, 2015, Avoiding the dark side of positive online consumer reviews: Enhancing reviews' usefulness for high risk-averse travelers, Journal of Business Research, 68, 1829, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.010 · DOI · Paper page
  11. De Wever, 2006, Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review, Computers & Education, 46, 6, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Deerwester, 1990, Indexing by latent semantic analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 33, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-9 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Dellarocas, 2006, What motivates people to review a product online? A study of the product specific antecedents of online movie ratings
  14. Dellarocas, 2007, Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21, 23, 10.1002/dir.20087 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Dholakia, 1977, Highly credible sources: Persuasive facilitators or persuasive liabilities?, Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 223, 10.1086/208671 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Duan, 2008, The dynamics of online word-of-mouth and product sales: An empirical investigation of the movie industry, Journal of Retailing, 84, 233, 10.1016/j.jretai.2008.04.005 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Gangold, 1999, Word of mouth communication in a service marketplace, Journal of Services Marketing, 13, 73, 10.1108/08876049910256186 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Goldsmith, 2006, Measuring motivations for online opinion seeking, Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6, 1, 10.1080/15252019.2006.10722114 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hajli, 2014, Developing tourism education through social media, Tourism Planning and Development, 11, 1, 10.1080/21568316.2014.883426 · DOI
  20. Hajli, 2015, Social commerce: The transfer of powers from sellers to buyers, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 94, 350, 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.01.012 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Hajli, 2014, Social word of mouth: How trust develops in the market, International Journal of Market Research, 56, 1, 10.2501/IJMR-2014-045 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Hajli, 2014, The role of social support on relationship quality and social commerce, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 87, 17, 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Hajli, 2014, A study of the impact of social media on consumers, International Journal of Market Research, 56, 388, 10.2501/IJMR-2014-025 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Hajli, 2014, Developing online health communities through digital media, International Journal of Information Management, 34, 311, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.01.006 · DOI
  25. Hajli, 2015, Social commerce constructs and consumer’s intention to buy, International Journal of Information Management, 35, 183, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.12.005 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Herr, 1991, Effects of word of mouth and product attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective source, Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 454, 10.1086/208570 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Ho-Dac, 2013, The effects of positive and negative online customer reviews: Do brand strength and category maturity matter?, Journal of Marketing, 77, 37, 10.1509/jm.11.0011 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Huang, 2013, Comprehension and assessment of product reviews: A review-product congruity proposition, Journal of Management Information Systems, 30, 311, 10.2753/MIS0742-1222300311 · DOI
  29. Jensen, 2013, Credibility of Anonymous online product reviews: A language expectancy perspective, Journal of Management Information System, 30, 293, 10.2753/MIS0742-1222300109 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Jivani, 2011, A comparative study of stemming algorithms, International Journal of Computer Technology and Applications, 2, 1930
  31. Kim, 2006, Automatically assessing review helpfulness
  32. Landauer, 1997, A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge, Psychological Review, 104, 211, 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Lee, 2008, The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: An information processing view, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7, 341, 10.1016/j.elerap.2007.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Li, 2011, Online persuasion: How the written word drives WOM: Evidence from consumer-generated product reviews, Journal of Advertising Research, 51, 239, 10.2501/JAR-51-1-239-257 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Li, 2013, Helpfulness of online product reviews as seen by consumers: Source and content features, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17, 101, 10.2753/JEC1086-4415170404 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Liu, 2006, Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue, Journal of Marketing, 70, 74, 10.1509/jmkg.70.3.74 · doi:10.1509/jmkg.70.3.74 · Paper page
  37. Ludwig, 2013, More than words: The influence of affective content and linguistic style matches in online reviews on conversion rates, Journal of Marketing, 77, 87, 10.1509/jm.11.0560 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Mallapragada, 2016, Exploring the effects of what (Product) and where (Website) characteristics on online shopping behavior, Journal of Marketing, 80, 21, 10.1509/jm.15.0138 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Matos, 2008, Word of mouth communication in marketing: A meta-analytic review of antecedents and moderators, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 578, 10.1007/s11747-008-0121-1 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Mudambi, 2010, What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com, MIS Quarterly, 34, 185, 10.2307/20721420 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Pan, 2011, Born unequal: A study of the helpfulness of user-generated product reviews, Journal of Retailing, 87, 598, 10.1016/j.jretai.2011.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Pavlou, 2006, The nature and role of feedback text comments in online marketplaces: Implications for trust building, price premiums, and seller differentiation, Information Systems Research, 17, 392, 10.1287/isre.1060.0106 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Rehder, 1998, Using latent semantic analysis to assess knowledge: Some technical considerations, Discourse Processes, 25, 337, 10.1080/01638539809545031 · DOI
  44. Sen, 2007, Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the web, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21, 76, 10.1002/dir.20090 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Senecal, 2004, The influence of online product recommendations on consumers’ online choices, Journal of Retailing, 80, 159, 10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Sidorova, 2008, Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline, MIS Quarterly, 32, 467, 10.2307/25148852 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Sridhar, 2012, Social influence effects in online product ratings, Journal of Marketing, 76, 70, 10.1509/jm.10.0377 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Sweeney, 2012, Word of mouth: Measuring the power of individual messages, European Journal of Marketing, 46, 237, 10.1108/03090561211189310 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Tsao, 2015, eWOM persuasiveness: Do eWOM platforms and product type matter?, Electronic Commerce Research, 15, 509, 10.1007/s10660-015-9198-z · DOI
  50. Tsao, 2014, Which type of online review is more persuasive? The influence of consumer reviews and critic ratings on moviegoers, Electronic Commerce Research, 14, 559, 10.1007/s10660-014-9160-5 · DOI
  51. Westland, 2015, Editorial: The golden age of consumer research, Electronic Commerce Research, 15, 297, 10.1007/s10660-015-9189-0 · doi:10.1007/s10660-015-9189-0
  52. Yang, 2004, Online service quality dimensions and their relationships with satisfaction: A content analysis of customer reviews of securities brokerage services, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 15, 302, 10.1108/09564230410540953 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Yang, 2004, Measuring customer perceived online service quality: Scale development and managerial implications, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24, 1149, 10.1108/01443570410563278 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Zhang, 2010, When does electronic word of mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews, Journal of Business Research, 63, 1336, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.12.011 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Zhu, 2010, Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics, Journal of Marketing, 74, 133, 10.1509/jmkg.74.2.133 · doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.2.133 · Paper page

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Ahmad, S. N., & Laroche, M.
Venue
International Journal of Information Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
202-213
ISSN
0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.08.004
OpenAlex
W2509365102
Cited by
166
References
10
FWCI
43.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analyzing electronic word of mouth: A social commerce construct. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.08.004
The paper
Ahmad, S. N., & Laroche, M. (2017). Analyzing electronic word of mouth: A social commerce construct. International Journal of Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.08.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.