Cited by 294Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsChronic Disease Management Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 81 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

The CardioMetabolic Health Alliance

Open access

Abstract

The Cardiometabolic Think Tank was convened on June 20, 2014, in Washington, DC, as a "call to action" activity focused on defining new patient care models and approaches to address contemporary issues of cardiometabolic risk and disease. Individual experts representing >20 professional organizations participated in this roundtable discussion. The Think Tank consensus was that the metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a complex pathophysiological state comprised of a cluster of clinically measured and typically unmeasured risk factors, is progressive in its course, and is associated with serious and extensive comorbidity, but tends to be clinically under-recognized. The ideal patient care model for MetS must accurately identify those at risk before MetS develops and must recognize subtypes and stages of MetS to more effectively direct prevention and therapies. This new MetS care model introduces both affirmed and emerging concepts that will require consensus development, validation, and optimization in the future.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1328

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 81 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 47 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 39
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 20
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
53 of 53
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no targeted comprehensive care approach to address the needs of MetS patients.

    “Second, there is no targeted comprehensive care approach to address the needs of MetS patients.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no system to implement risk reduction and disease prevention for MetS.

    “Third, assuming there was such an approach, there is no system to implement risk reduction and disease prevention.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The term MetS is the term most often used in scientific published data and by health care professionals.

    “TT participants concluded that MetS was the term most often used in the scientific published data and by health care professionals.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Susceptibility to MetS transcends obesity, as there are obese individuals without MetS and nonobese individuals with MetS.

    “Susceptibility to MetS transcends obesity, however, as there are obese individuals without MetS and nonobese individuals with MetS.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Several factors modulate the prevalence of MetS in the presence of obesity, including lifestyle factors such as poor nutritional quality and lack of physical activity.

    “Several factors modulate the prevalence of MetS in the presence of obesity, including lifestyle factors such as poor nutritional quality and lack of physical activity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Although risk for adverse outcomes generally increases with each subsequent stage of MetS, the absolute risk for developing MetS consequences varies substantially within populations.

    “It should be noted that although risk for adverse outcomes generally increases with each subsequent stage, the absolute risk for developing MetS consequences varies substantially within populations.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Integrated health networks allow patients to monitor their own progress, which improves self-motivation and patient engagement in self-care.

    “Integrated health networks allow patients to monitor their own progress, which improves selfmotivation and patient engagement in self-care.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The NCEP-ATP III criteria do not fully encompass the pathophysiological complexity of the syndrome, recognize predisposition to different types of end-organ damage, or account for health disparities according to race, sex, or socioeconomic status, in screening for or treating the syndrome.

    “However, these criteria do not fully encompass the pathophysiological complexity of the syndrome, recognize predisposition to different types of end-organ damage, or account for health disparities according to race, sex, or socioeconomic status, in screening for or treating the syndrome.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    MetS is typically under-recognized in the clinical setting, even just on the basis of the 5 standard criteria.

    “MetS is typically under-recognized in the clinical setting, even just on the basis of the 5 standard criteria.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Additional elements of MetS include high apolipoprotein B, small low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size, endothelial dysfunction, insulin resistance, and prothrombotic and proinflammatory states.

    “Additional elements of MetS include high apolipoprotein B, small low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size, endothelial dysfunction, insulin resistance, and prothrombotic and proinflammatory states.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    These additional elements are less widely appreciated as components of MetS and are not typically measured in a clinical setting.

    “Not only are these less widely appreciated as components of MetS, but they are also not typically measured in a clinical setting.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is significant heterogeneity of expert opinion as to what constitutes MetS, to what degree it represents a syndrome or a disease, and whether it has any health-related effects.

    “There is significant heterogeneity of expert opinion as to what constitutes MetS, to what degree it represents a syndrome or a disease, and whether it has any health-related effects”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Disparity can manifest as decreased accessibility to health care and failure to recognize or appropriately treat at-risk populations.

    “Disparity can manifest as decreased accessibility to health care and failure to recognize or appropriately treat at-risk populations.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Other nonracial, high-risk, under-represented populations likely requiring more intensive consideration include patients with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, cancer survivors, individuals with severe mental illness, and children with developmental disabilities.

    “Other nonracial, high-risk, under-represented populations likely requiring more intensive consideration include patients with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, cancer survivors, individuals with severe mental illness, and children with developmental disabilities.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) would support this implementation.

    “It is important to note that many of the provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) would support this implementation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The PCMH addresses each of the aforementioned principles of care model implementation.

    “To varying degrees, the PCMH addresses each of the aforementioned principles of care model implementation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Comparisons across studies on the PCMH are often difficult because of differences in definition and focus.

    “However, comparisons across studies on the PCMH are often difficult because of differences in definition and focus.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Long-term data on PCMH models is limited, as most of these models were implemented over the last 5 to 10 years.

    “Long-term data is also limited, as most of these models were implemented over the last 5 to 10 years.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The PCMH model affects MetS sequelae and outcomes.

    “The PCMH model affects MetS sequelae and outcomes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is less published data available to assess PCMH reimbursement strategies to facilitate coordinated care or on how this model addresses health care disparities.

    “There is less published data available to assess PCMH reimbursement strategies to facilitate coordinated care or on how this model addresses health care disparities.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The ACO is a larger organization than the PCMH that includes hospitals and specialty care.

    “Although the PCMH focuses on coordination at the level of primary care, the ACO is a larger organization that includes hospitals and specialty care.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Compared with many PCMH models, the ACO's reimbursement changes and cost-saving goals are more explicit and are better aligned to facilitate coordinated care.

    “Compared with many PCMH models, the ACO's reimbursement changes and cost-saving goals are more explicit and are better aligned to facilitate coordinated care.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    ACO design has not specifically addressed health care disparities.

    “Although integration of care into larger organizations may address health care disparities, this has not been specifically addressed in ACO design.”
23 of 23

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Sector count does not match the list

    Minor

    The text says the plan covers 8 sectors, but the subsequent semicolon-separated list names 11. Combining some entries could produce eight groups, but the list does not present them that way.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 109 references

4 of the 109 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 293

Metadata

Authors
Sperling, L. S., Mechanick, J. I., Neeland, I. J., Herrick, C. J., Després, J.-P., Ndumele, C. E., Vijayaraghavan, K., Handelsman, Y., Puckrein, G. A., Araneta, M. R. G., Blum, Q. K., Collins, K. K., Cook, S., Dhurandhar, N. V., Dixon, D. L., Egan, B. M., Ferdinand, D. P., Herman, L. M., Hessen, S. E., Jacobson, T. A., Pate, R. R., Ratner, R. E., Brinton, E. A., Forker, A. D., Ritzenthaler, L. L., & Grundy, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CA)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • National Quality Forum (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Inova Fairfax Hospital (US)
  • American Academy of Pediatrics (US)
  • Texas Tech University (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • New York Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • American Diabetes Association (US)
  • Foundation for Biomedical Research (US)
  • University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
  • American College of Cardiology (US)
Corresponding author
Sperling, Laurence S.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
66
Issue
9
Pages
1050-1067
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1152644542
Cited by
294
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
metabolic syndrome, cardiometabolic risk, patient care model, metabolic syndrome prevention, metabolic syndrome risk factors, consensus development
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, District of Columbia, Health Promotion, Humans, Hypertension, Models, Cardiovascular, Obesity, Societies, Medical, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Medicine, Metabolic Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review