Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 68

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An analysis of process-tracing research on consumer decision-making

Zuschke, Nick·2020·Journal of Business Research
DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.028
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.028

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 126

  1. Acedo, 2005, Current paradigms in the international management field: An author co-citation analysis, International Business Review, 14, 619, 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2005.05.003 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Alba, 1987, Dimensions of consumer expertise, Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411, 10.1086/209080 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Anderson, 2004, Eye movements do not reflect retrieval processes: Limits of the eye-mind hypothesis, Psychological Science, 15, 225, 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00656.x · DOI
  4. Ariely, 2010, Neuromarketing: The hope and hype of neuroimaging in business, Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 11, 284, 10.1038/nrn2795 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Armel, 2008, Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention, Judgment and Decision making, 3, 396, 10.1017/S1930297500000413 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Atalay, 2012, Shining in the center: Central gaze cascade effect on product choice, Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 848, 10.1086/665984 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Baumgartner, 2003, The structural influence of marketing journals: A citation analysis of the discipline and its subareas over time, Journal of Marketing, 67, 123, 10.1509/jmkg.67.2.123.18610 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bechara, 2005, The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision, Games and Economic Behavior, 52, 336, 10.1016/j.geb.2004.06.010 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Becker, 1964, Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method, Behavioral Science, 9, 226, 10.1002/bs.3830090304 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Bettman, 1977, Effects of information presentation format on consumer information acquisition strategies, Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 233, 10.1086/208672 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Bettman, 1998, Constructive consumer choice processes, Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 187, 10.1086/209535 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Bettman, 1979, Information format and choice task effects in decision making, Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 141, 10.1086/208757 · DOI
  13. Bialkova, 2014, Attention mediates the effect of nutrition label information on consumers' choice. Evidence from a choice experiment involving eye-tracking, Appetite, 76, 66, 10.1016/j.appet.2013.11.021 · DOI
  14. Bialkova, 2010, What determines consumer attention to nutrition labels?, Food Quality and Preference, 21, 1042, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.07.001 · DOI
  15. Bialkova, 2011, An efficient methodology for assessing attention to and effect of nutrition information displayed front-of-pack, Food Quality and Preference, 22, 592, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.03.010 · DOI
  16. Boksem, 2015, Brain responses to movie trailers predict individual preferences for movies and their population-wide commercial success, Journal of Marketing Research, 52, 482, 10.1509/jmr.13.0572 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Chabowski, 2013, A bibliometric analysis of the global branding literature and a research agenda, Journal of International Business Studies, 44, 622, 10.1057/jibs.2013.20 · DOI
  18. Chandon, 2009, Does in-store marketing work?: Effects of the number and position of shelf facings on brand attention and evaluation at the point of purchase, Journal of Marketing, 73, 1, 10.1509/jmkg.73.6.1 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Chen, 1986, A relationship between Lotka's law, Bradford's law, and Zipf's law, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37, 307, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198609)37:5<307::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-8 · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(198609)37:5<307::aid-asi5>3.0.co;2-8
  20. Cowburn, 2005, Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: A systematic review, Public Health Nutrition, 8, 10.1079/PHN2005666 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Deppe, 2005, Nonlinear responses within the medial prefrontal cortex reveal when specific implicit information influences economic decision making, Journal of Neuroimaging, 15, 171, 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2005.tb00303.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. Drèze, 1994, Shelf management and space elasticity, Journal of Retailing, 70, 301, 10.1016/0022-4359(94)90002-7 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Enax, 2016, Salient nutrition labels increase the integration of health attributes in food decision-making, Judgment and Decision making, 11, 460, 10.1017/S1930297500004563 · DOI
  24. Erk, 2002, Cultural objects modulate reward circuitry, Neuroreport, 13, 2499, 10.1097/00001756-200212200-00024 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Esch, 2012, Brands on the brain: Do consumers use declarative information or experienced emotions to evaluate brands?, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 75, 10.1016/j.jcps.2010.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Fetscherin, 2015, Consumer brand relationships research: A bibliometric citation meta-analysis, Journal of Business Research, 68, 380, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.010 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Feunekes, 2008, Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: Testing effectiveness of different nutrition labelling formats front-of-pack in four European countries, Appetite, 50, 57, 10.1016/j.appet.2007.05.009 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Ford, 1989, Process tracing methods: Contributions, problems, and neglected research questions, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 75, 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90059-9 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Fowles, 1981, Publication recommendations for Electrodermal measurements, Psychophysiology, 18, 232, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb03024.x · DOI · Paper page
  30. Gilbride, 2004, A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules, Marketing Science, 23, 391, 10.1287/mksc.1030.0032 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Glaholt, 2011, Eye movement monitoring as a process tracing methodology in decision making research, Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 4, 125, 10.1037/a0020692 · DOI
  32. Graham, 2011, Location, location, location: Eye-tracking evidence that consumers preferentially view prominently positioned nutrition information, Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 111, 1704, 10.1016/j.jada.2011.08.005 · DOI
  33. Graham, 2012, Predictors of nutrition label viewing during food purchase decision making: An eye tracking investigation, Public Health Nutrition, 15, 189, 10.1017/S1368980011001303 · DOI
  34. Graham, 2012, Eye tracking and nutrition label use: A review of the literature and recommendations for label enhancement, Food Policy, 37, 378, 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Grosenick, 2008, Interpretable classifiers for fMRI improve prediction of purchases, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 16, 539, 10.1109/TNSRE.2008.926701 · DOI
  36. Grunert, 2007, A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels, Journal of Public Health, 15, 385, 10.1007/s10389-007-0101-9 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Grunert, 2010, Nutrition knowledge, and use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels among consumers in the UK, Appetite, 55, 177, 10.1016/j.appet.2010.05.045 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Gurzki, 2017, Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis, Journal of Business Research, 77, 147, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.009 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Hare, 2009, Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system, Science (New York, N.Y.), 324, 646, 10.1126/science.1168450 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Hawley, 2013, The science on front-of-package food labels, Public Health Nutrition, 16, 430, 10.1017/S1368980012000754 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Helgeson, 1984, Trends in consumer behavior literature: A content analysis, Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 449, 10.1086/208985 · DOI
  42. Janiszewski, 1998, The influence of display characteristics on visual exploratory search behavior, Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 290, 10.1086/209540 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Jones, 2007, An objective examination of consumer perception of nutrition information based on healthiness ratings and eye movements, Public Health Nutrition, 10
  44. Just, 1980, A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension, Psychological Review, 87, 329, 10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Kable, 2007, The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice, Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1625, 10.1038/nn2007 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Kaiser, 1974, Little jiffy, mark iv, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 111, 10.1177/001316447403400115 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Karmarkar, 2017, Consumer neuroscience, Organizational Research Methods, 3
  48. Khushaba, 2013, Consumer neuroscience: Assessing the brain response to marketing stimuli using electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye tracking, Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 3803, 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.095 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Kim, 2008, Evaluation of internet advertising research: A bibliometric analysis of citations from key sources, Journal of Advertising, 37, 99
  50. Krajbich, 2011, Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 13852, 10.1073/pnas.1101328108 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Krugman, 1994, Do adolescents attend to warnings in cigarette advertising? An eye tracking approach, Journal of Advertising Research, 39, 10.1080/00218499.1994.12466981 · DOI
  52. Kuntner, 2016, The scope of price promotion research: An informetric study, Journal of Business Research, 69, 2687, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.004 · DOI
  53. Levy, 2011, Choice from non-choice: Predicting consumer preferences from blood oxygenation level-dependent signals obtained during passive viewing, The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 31, 118, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3214-10.2011 · DOI
  54. Lin, 2015, A think-aloud study of strategy use by EFL college readers reading Chinese and English texts, Journal of Research in Reading, 38, 286, 10.1111/1467-9817.12012 · doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12012
  55. Linder, 2010, Organic labeling influences food valuation and choice, NeuroImage, 53, 215, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.077 · DOI
  56. Lohse, 1997, Consumer eye movement patterns on yellow pages advertising, Journal of Advertising, 26, 61, 10.1080/00913367.1997.10673518 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Lohse, 1996, A comparison of two process tracing methods for choice tasks, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 28, 10.1006/obhd.1996.0087 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Luce, 1991, Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization (1. issued as paperback), vol. 8
  59. McCain, 1990, Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 433, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<433::AID-ASI11>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
  60. McClure, 2004, Neural correlates of behavioral preference for culturally familiar drinks, Neuron, 44, 379, 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.019 · DOI · Paper page
  61. McMillan, 2008, Mapping the invisible colleges of R&D management, R&D Management, 38, 69, 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00495.x · DOI
  62. Meißner, 2016, Eye tracking reveals processes that enable conjoint choices to become increasingly efficient with practice, Journal of Marketing Research, 53, 1, 10.1509/jmr.13.0467 · DOI
  63. Meißner, 2017, The promise of eye-tracking methodology in organizational research, Organizational Research Methods, 8
  64. Meißner, 2017, Combining virtual reality and mobile eye tracking to provide a naturalistic experimental environment for shopper research, Journal of Business Research
  65. Milosavljevic, 2012, Relative visual saliency differences induce sizable bias in consumer choice, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 67, 10.1016/j.jcps.2011.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Nerur, 2008, The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co-citation analysis, Strategic Management Journal, 29, 319, 10.1002/smj.659 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Orquin, 2014, A Brunswik lens model of consumer health judgments of packaged foods, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 28
  68. Orquin, 2013, Attention and choice: A review on eye movements in decision making, Acta Psychologica, 144, 190, 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.003 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Paulus, 2003, Ventromedial prefrontal cortex activation is critical for preference judgments, Neuroreport, 14, 1311
  70. Payne, 1976, Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 366, 10.1016/0030-5073(76)90022-2 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Payne, 1992, Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective, Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87, 10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.000511 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Pfeiffer, 2014, On the influence of context-based complexity on information search patterns: An individual perspective, Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 7, 103, 10.1037/npe0000021 · DOI
  73. Pieters, 1999, Visual attention to repeated print advertising: A test of scanpath theory, Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 424, 10.1177/002224379903600403 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Pieters, 2002, Breaking through the clutter: Benefits of advertisement originality and familiarity for brand attention and memory, Management Science, 48, 765, 10.1287/mnsc.48.6.765.192 · DOI · Paper page
  75. Pieters, 2004, Attention capture and transfer in advertising: Brand, pictorial, and text-size effects, Journal of Marketing, 68, 36, 10.1509/jmkg.68.2.36.27794 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Pieters, 2007, Goal control of attention to advertising: The Yarbus implication, Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 224, 10.1086/519150 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Pilkington, 2006, Operations management themes, concepts and relationships: A forward retrospective of IJOPM, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26, 1255, 10.1108/01443570610705854 · DOI
  78. Plassmann, 2007, What can advertisers learn from neuroscience?, International Journal of Advertising, 26, 151, 10.1080/10803548.2007.11073005 · DOI
  79. Plassmann, 2007, Orbitofrontal cortex encodes willingness to pay in everyday economic transactions, The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 27, 9984, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2131-07.2007 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Plassmann, 2008, Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 1050, 10.1073/pnas.0706929105 · DOI · Paper page
  81. Plassmann, 2012, Branding the brain: A critical review and outlook, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 18, 10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.010 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Plassmann, 2015, Consumer neuroscience: Applications, challenges, and possible solutions, Journal of Marketing Research, 52, 427, 10.1509/jmr.14.0048 · DOI · Paper page
  83. Poels, 2006, How to capture the heart?: Reviewing 20 years of emotion measurement in advertising, Journal of Advertising Research, 46, 18, 10.2501/S0021849906060041 · doi:10.2501/s0021849906060041
  84. Rapp, 2015, “Lordy, Lordy, look Who's 40!:” The journal of consumer research reaches a milestone, Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 19, 10.1093/jcr/ucv011 · DOI
  85. Rayner, 2008, Eye movements when looking at print advertisements: The goal of the viewer matters, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 697, 10.1002/acp.1389 · DOI
  86. Rayner, 2001, Integrating text and pictorial information: Eye movements when looking at print advertisements, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 219
  87. Reimann, 2010, Aesthetic package design: A behavioral, neural, and psychological investigation, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 431, 10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.009 · DOI · Paper page
  88. Reutskaja, 2011, Search dynamics in consumer choice under time pressure: An eye-tracking study, American Economic Review, 101, 900, 10.1257/aer.101.2.900 · DOI · Paper page
  89. Rosbergen, 1997, Visual attention to advertising: A segment-level analysis, Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 305, 10.1086/209512 · DOI · Paper page
  90. Russo, 1983, Strategies for multiattribute binary choice, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 676, 10.1037/0278-7393.9.4.676 · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.9.4.676 · Paper page
  91. Russo, 1994, An eye-fixation analysis of choice processes for consumer nondurables, Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 274, 10.1086/209397 · DOI · Paper page
  92. Ryan, 2018, The eyes have it: Using eye tracking to inform information processing strategies in multi-attributes choices, Health Economics, 27, 709, 10.1002/hec.3626 · DOI
  93. Sanfey, 2003, The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game, Science (New York, N.Y.), 300, 1755, 10.1126/science.1082976 · DOI · Paper page
  94. Schaefer, 2006, Neural correlates of culturally familiar brands of car manufacturers, NeuroImage, 31, 861, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.047 · DOI
  95. Schaefer, 2007, Favorite brands as cultural objects modulate reward circuit, Neuroreport, 18, 141, 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328010ac84 · DOI
  96. Schulte-Mecklenbeck, 2017, Process-tracing methods in decision making: On growing up in the 70s, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 442, 10.1177/0963721417708229 · DOI
  97. Schulte-Mecklenbeck, 2011, The role of process data in the development and testing of process models of judgment and decision making, Judgment and Decision making, 6, 733, 10.1017/S1930297500004162 · DOI
  98. Shafique, 2013, Thinking inside the box?: Intellectual structure of the knowledge base of innovation research (1988–2008), Strategic Management Journal, 34, 62, 10.1002/smj.2002 · DOI · Paper page
  99. Shi, 2013, Information acquisition during online decision making: A model-based exploration using eye-tracking data, Management Science, 59, 1009, 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1625 · DOI
  100. Simon, 1955, A behavioral model of rational choice, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99, 10.2307/1884852 · DOI · Paper page
  101. Small, 1973, Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265, 10.1002/asi.4630240406 · DOI · Paper page
  102. Small, 2006, Tracking and predicting growth areas in science, Scientometrics, 68, 595, 10.1007/s11192-006-0132-y · DOI · Paper page
  103. Small, 1977, A co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of collagen research, Social Studies of Science, 1977, 139, 10.1177/030631277700700202 · DOI · Paper page
  104. Smidts, 2014, Advancing consumer neuroscience, Marketing Letters, 25, 257, 10.1007/s11002-014-9306-1 · DOI
  105. Stüttgen, 2012, A satisficing choice model, Marketing Science, 31, 878, 10.1287/mksc.1120.0732 · DOI
  106. Sullivan, 2015, Dietary self-control is related to the speed with which attributes of healthfulness and tastiness are processed, Psychological Science, 26, 122, 10.1177/0956797614559543 · DOI · Paper page
  107. Swait, 2001, The influence of task complexity on consumer choice: A latent class model of decision strategy switching, Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 135, 10.1086/321952 · DOI · Paper page
  108. Teichert, 2010, Investigating research streams of conjoint analysis: A bibliometric study, Business Research, 3, 49, 10.1007/BF03342715 · DOI
  109. Tusche, 2010, Neural responses to unattended products predict later consumer choices, The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 30, 8024, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0064-10.2010 · DOI
  110. Tversky, 1969, Intransitivity of preferences, Psychological Review, 76, 31, 10.1037/h0026750 · DOI · Paper page
  111. Valenzuela, 2013, Shelf space schemas: Myth or reality?, Journal of Business Research, 66, 881, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.12.006 · DOI
  112. Van der Lans, 2008, Eye-movement analysis of search effectiveness, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 452, 10.1198/016214507000000437 · DOI
  113. Van der Lans, 2017, Eye movements during search and choice, vol. 254, 331, 10.1007/978-3-319-56941-3_11 · DOI
  114. Van Herpen, 2011, Front-of-pack nutrition labels. Their effect on attention and choices when consumers have varying goals and time constraints, Appetite, 57, 148, 10.1016/j.appet.2011.04.011 · DOI · Paper page
  115. Visschers, 2010, Health motivation and product design determine consumers' visual attention to nutrition information on food products, Public Health Nutrition, 13, 1099, 10.1017/S1368980009993235 · DOI
  116. Vogel, 2012, The dynamic capability view in strategic management: A bibliometric review, International Journal of Management Reviews, 27
  117. Wang, 2015, The journal of consumer research at 40: A historical analysis, Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 5, 10.1093/jcr/ucv009 · DOI
  118. Wang, 2008, Validity, reliability, and applicability of psychophysiological techniques in marketing research, Psychology and Marketing, 25, 197, 10.1002/mar.20206 · DOI
  119. Wästlund, 2015, Heuristics and resource depletion: Eye-tracking customers' in situ gaze behavior in the field, Journal of Business Research, 68, 95, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.05.001 · DOI
  120. Wedel, 2015, Attention research in marketing: A review of eye-tracking studies, 569
  121. Wedel, 2000, Eye fixations on advertisements and memory for brands: A model and findings, Marketing Science, 19, 297, 10.1287/mksc.19.4.297.11794 · DOI · Paper page
  122. Wedel, 2008, A review of eye-tracking research in marketing, vol. 4, 123, 10.1108/S1548-6435(2008)0000004009 · doi:10.1108/s1548-6435(2008)0000004009 · Paper page
  123. Yang, 2015, A bounded rationality model of information search and choice in preference measurement, Journal of Marketing Research, 52, 166, 10.1509/jmr.13.0288 · DOI
  124. Yoon, 2012, Decision neuroscience and consumer decision making, Marketing Letters, 23, 473, 10.1007/s11002-012-9188-z · DOI
  125. Yoon, 2006, A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of neural dissociations between brand and person judgments, Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 31, 10.1086/504132 · DOI · Paper page
  126. Zupic, 2015, Bibliometric methods in management and organization, Organizational Research Methods, 18, 429, 10.1177/1094428114562629 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 68

Metadata

Authors
Zuschke, N.
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
111
Pages
305-320
ISSN
0148-2963
DOI
10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.028
Cited by
68
References
22
Language
en
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.