Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 739

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative study of high intensity ultrasound effects on food proteins functionality

Open access
Arzeni, C., Martínez, K., Zema, P., Arias, A., Pérez, O.E., Pilosof, A.M.R.·2012·Journal of Food Engineering
DOI 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.08.018
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract The objective of this work was to comparatively explore the impact of high intensity ultrasound (HIUS) on the functionality of some of the most used food proteins at the industrial level: whey protein concentrate (WPC), soy protein isolate (500E) and egg white protein (EW). 10% w/w solutions at pH 6.5–7.1 were treated with HIUS for 20 min, in an ultrasonic processor. The operating conditions were: 20 kHz, 4.27 ± 0.71 W and 20% of amplitude. Before and after the HIUS treatment, the size of protein particles was measured by static light scattering. The amount of sulfhydryl groups was determined with Ellman’s reagent and the surface hydrophobicity by a fluorescence technique. The effects of HIUS on samples viscosity were determined. The evolution of the elastic ( G ′) and viscous ( G ″) moduli as well as tan δ were registered upon time and temperature in a controlled stress rheometer. In general, HIUS promoted a decrease in the consistency index of all protein solutions, mainly of soybean isolate. The gelation performance of EW was not modified by HIUS. However, WPC presented a higher elastic character, but 500E did not show changes upon heating, as it was already denatured before HIUS treatment. The size of aggregates suffered an overall reduction for WPC and 500E, but a slight increase for EW. Sulfhydryl content was unchanged for all proteins after HIUS application but surface hydrophobicity was greatly increased after treatment for all proteins. HIUS affected the studied functional properties differently depending on the size and nature of the protein. This technology could be used to obtain improved functional properties in some protein samples.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.08.018

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Bhaskaracharya, 2009, Selected applications of ultrasonics in food processing, Food Engineering Reviews, 1, 31, 10.1007/s12393-009-9003-7 · DOI
  2. Camino, 2009, Molecular and functional modification of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose by high-intensity ultrasound, Food Hydrocolloids, 23, 1089, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2008.08.015 · DOI
  3. Cárcel, 2007, High intensity ultrasound effects on meat brining, Meat Science, 76, 611, 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.01.022 · DOI
  4. Chandrapala, 2010, Effects of ultrasound on the thermal and structural characteristics of proteins in reconstituted whey protein concentrate, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 8, 951, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.12.016 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chen, 1997, Effects of ultrasonic conditions and storage in acidic solutions on changes in molecular weight and polydispersity of treated chitosan, Carbohydrate Research, 299, 287, 10.1016/S0008-6215(97)00019-0 · DOI
  6. Clark, 1987, Structural and mechanical properties of biopolymer gels, vol. 83
  7. Clark, 1981, Electron microscopy of network structures in thermally-induced globular protein gels, Int. J. Peptide Protein Res., 17, 380, 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1981.tb02005.x · DOI
  8. Dumay, 1994, High-pressure unfolding and aggregation of β-lactoglobulin and the baroprotective effects of sucrose, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 42, 1861, 10.1021/jf00045a006 · DOI
  9. Egelandsdal, 1986, Dynamic rheological measurements on heat-induced myosin gels: an evaluation of the method’s suitability for the filamentous gels, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 37, 944, 10.1002/jsfa.2740370916 · DOI
  10. Ellman, 1959, Tissue sulfhydryl groups, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 82, 70, 10.1016/0003-9861(59)90090-6 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Fernandez-Diaz, 2000, Effects of pulsed electric fields on ovalbumin solutions and dialyzed egg white, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 48, 2332, 10.1021/jf9908796 · DOI
  12. Flosdorf, 1933, The chemical action of audible sound, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 55, 3051, 10.1021/ja01334a509 · DOI
  13. Furukawa, 1983, Ultrasonic-induced modification of flow properties of soy protein dispersion, Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 47, 745, 10.1271/bbb1961.47.745 · DOI
  14. Gabriele, 2009, Characterisation of dairy emulsions by NMR and rheological techniques, Food Hydrocolloids, 23, 619, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2008.05.002 · DOI
  15. Gordon, 2010, Application of high intensity ultrasounds to control the size of whey proteins particles, Food Biophysics, 5, 203, 10.1007/s11483-010-9161-4 · DOI
  16. Gülseren, 2007, Structural and functional changes in ultrasonicated bovine serum albumin solutions, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 14, 173, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2005.07.006 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Güzey, 2006, Interfacial properties and structural conformation of thermosonicated bovine serum albumin, Food Hydrocolloids, 20, 669, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2005.06.008 · DOI
  18. Huang, 2001, Hydrocolloids in emulsions: particle size distribution and interfacial activity, Food Hydrocolloids, 15, 533, 10.1016/S0268-005X(01)00091-1 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Jambrak, 2008, Effect of ultrasound treatment on solubility and foaming properties of whey protein suspensions, Journal of Food Engineering, 86, 281, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.10.004 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Jambrak, 2009, Physical properties of ultrasound treated soy proteins, Journal of Food Engineering, 93, 386, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Jambrak, 2010, Ultrasonic effect on physicochemical and functional properties of α-lactalbumin, LWT – Food Science and Technology, 43, 254, 10.1016/j.lwt.2009.09.001 · DOI
  22. Kato, 1980, Hydrophobicity determined by a fluorescence probe method and its correlation with surface properties of proteins, Biochimica et biophysica acta, 624, 13, 10.1016/0005-2795(80)90220-2 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Kimura, 1996, Standardization of ultrasonic power for sonochemical reaction, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 3, S157, 10.1016/S1350-4177(96)00021-1 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Knorr, 2004, Applications and potential of ultrasonics in food processing, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 15, 261, 10.1016/j.tifs.2003.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Krešić, 2008, Influence of novel food processing technologies on the rheological and thermophysical properties of whey proteins, Journal of Food Engineering, 87, 64, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.10.024 · DOI
  26. Leroux, 2003, Emulsion stabilizing properties of pectin, Food Hydrocolloids, 17, 455, 10.1016/S0268-005X(03)00027-4 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Liu, 2006, Effect of ultrasonic treatment on the biochemphysical properties of chitosan, Carbohydrate Polymers, 64, 553, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.11.007 · DOI
  28. Lorimer, 1995, Effect of ultrasound on the degradation of aqueous native dextran, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2, S55, 10.1016/1350-4177(94)00013-I · DOI
  29. Lu, 2002, Sonolysis of synthetic sediment particles: particle characteristics affecting particle dissolution and size reduction, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 9, 181, 10.1016/S1350-4177(02)00076-7 · DOI
  30. Martínez, 2009, Interfacial and foaming properties of soy protein and their hydrolysates, Food Hydrocolloids, 23, 2149, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2009.03.015 · DOI
  31. Mine, 1995, Recent advances in the understanding of egg white protein functionality, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 6, 225, 10.1016/S0924-2244(00)89083-4 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Mishra, 2001, Functional improvement of whey protein concentrate on interaction with pectin, Food Hydrocolloids, 15, 9, 10.1016/S0268-005X(00)00043-6 · DOI
  33. Nielsen, 1985, Structure of soy proteins, vol. 5, 27
  34. O’Donnell, 2010, Effect of ultrasonic processing on food enzymes of industrial importance, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 21, 358, 10.1016/j.tifs.2010.04.007 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Paraskevopoulou, 2000, Low-cholesterol yolk protein concentrate, vol. 41, 77
  36. Perez, 2004, Pulsed electric fields effects on the molecular structure and gelation of β-lactoglobulin concentrate and egg white, Food Research International, 37, 102, 10.1016/j.foodres.2003.09.008 · DOI
  37. Petrier, 1992, Unexpected frequency effects on the rate of oxidative processes induced by ultrasound, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 3148, 10.1021/ja00034a077 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Raso, 1999, Influence of different factors on the output power transferred into medium by ultrasound, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 5, 157, 10.1016/S1350-4177(98)00042-X · DOI · Paper page
  39. Ratoarinoro, 1995, Power measurement in sonochemistry, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2, S43, 10.1016/1350-4177(94)00010-P · DOI · Paper page
  40. Relkin, 1998, Heat-induced gelation of globular protein mixtures. A DSC and scanning electron microscopic study, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 51, 747, 10.1007/BF03341451 · DOI
  41. Riener, 2009, Characterisation of volatile compounds generated in milk by high intensity ultrasound, International Dairy Journal, 19, 269, 10.1016/j.idairyj.2008.10.017 · DOI
  42. Shimada, 1988, Determination of sulfhydryl groups and disulfide bonds in heat-induced gels of soy protein isolate, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 36, 147, 10.1021/jf00079a038 · DOI
  43. Stading, 1990, Viscoelastic behaviour of [beta]-lactoglobulin gel structures, Food Hydrocolloids, 4, 121, 10.1016/S0268-005X(09)80013-1 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Sun, 2010, Gelation properties of salt-extracted pea protein induced by heat treatment, Food Research International, 43, 509, 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.039 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Taylor, 1980, Antioxidant activity of skim milk: effect of sonication, Journal of Dairy Science, 63, 1938, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)83161-4 · DOI
  46. Vohra, 1991, Evaluation of soybean meal determines adequacy of heat treatment, Feedstuffs, 22
  47. Zisu, 2010, Ultrasonic processing of dairy systems in large scale reactors, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 17, 1075, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.10.014 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Arzeni, C., Martínez, K., Zema, P., Arias, A., Pérez, O. E., & Pilosof, A. M. R.
Venue
Journal of Food Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
108
Issue
3
Pages
463-472
ISSN
0260-8774 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.08.018
OpenAlex
W2036787389
Cited by
739
References
2
FWCI
17.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • University of Buenos Aires (UBA: X 175, UBA 20020090200499)
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
  • Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica de la República Argentina (PICT 2007-00545, PICT 2008-1901)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.