Cited by 329Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The visual word form area and the frequency with which words are encountered: evidence from a parametric fMRI study

Kronbichler, Martin, Hutzler, Florian, Wimmer, Heinz, Mair, Alois, Staffen, Wolfgang, Ladurner, Gunther·2004·NeuroImage

Abstract

Cohen and Dehaene et al. proposed that the Visual Word Form Area (VWFA) in the left midfusiform gyrus, contrary to its name, is limited to the extraction of an abstract letter string and not involved in proper visual word recognition. We examined this prelexical function of the VWFA by a parametric block design with five levels of written word frequency. The lowest level was represented by pseudowords and the highest level by words of very high frequency. Contrary to the assumed prelexical function of the VWFA, increasing frequency was associated with decreasing brain activation in a large posterior cluster of the left hemisphere including middle and posterior fusiform regions. The same negative relation between frequency and activation was found in several left frontal clusters. The relation of increasing frequency and decreasing activation in occipitotemporal regions corresponds to a similar relation in the same brain regions found by studies which experimentally manipulated object or face familiarity. This convergence suggests that fusiform regions are specialized for extracting and storing abstract patterns when processing visual objects and these patterns serve as recognition units in subsequent encounters with the same objects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.021

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kronbichler, M., Hutzler, F., Wimmer, H., Mair, A., Staffen, W., & Ladurner, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Salzburg (AT)
  • Christian Doppler Klinik (AT)
Corresponding author
Kronbichler, Martin
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-03
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
946-953
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076114001
Cited by
329
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 23
FWCI
23.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
visual word form area, word frequency, fusiform gyrus, visual word recognition, prelexical processing, pattern recognition, object familiarity, face familiarity, left hemisphere, occipitotemporal cortex, pseudowords
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reading, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review