Cited by 765Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience, Education and Cognitive FunctionMemory Processes and Influences

Temporal and spatial dynamics of brain structure changes during extensive learning

Open access
Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Kempermann, G., Kuhn, H. G., Winkler, J., Buchel, C., May, A.·2006·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The current view regarding human long-term memory as an active process of encoding and retrieval includes a highly specific learning-induced functional plasticity in a network of multiple memory systems. Voxel-based morphometry was used to detect possible structural brain changes associated with learning. Magnetic resonance images were obtained at three different time points while medical students learned for their medical examination. During the learning period, the gray matter increased significantly in the posterior and lateral parietal cortex bilaterally. These structural changes did not change significantly toward the third scan during the semester break 3 months after the exam. The posterior hippocampus showed a different pattern over time: the initial increase in gray matter during the learning period was even more pronounced toward the third time point. These results indicate that the acquisition of a great amount of highly abstract information may be related to a particular pattern of structural gray matter changes in particular brain areas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4628-05.2006

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Structural changes were demonstrated in healthy subjects with longitudinal designs in learning paradigms, associated with navigation or musical training.

    “Moreover, structural changes were demonstrated in healthy subjects with longitudinal designs in learning paradigms, associated with experience of navigation or musical training to name only a few (Draganski et al., 2006;Hyde et al., 2009;Maguire et al., 2000).”

    From Serotonin and neuroplasticity – Links between molecular, functional and structural pathophysiology in depression (2017) · cites this paper as Draganski et al., 2006

    The Volunteers and Longitudinal analysis sections describe repeated scans of medical students and learning-associated structural changes, supporting the longitudinal-learning part of the claim. This study examined preparation for a medical exam, not navigation or musical training; the Introduction discusses those abilities in connection with other, cross-sectional studies. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Learning in humans during exam study or juggling practice alters cortical structure, consistent with use contributing to structural brain changes.

    “Learning in humans during studying for exams (Draganski et al., 2006) or practicing juggling (Draganski et al., 2004) alters cortical structure consistent with use contributing to structural changes in brain.”

    From Impulsivity, frontal lobes and risk for addiction (2009) · cites this paper as Draganski et al., 2006

  • Brain structure changes with environmental demands of learning to juggle or studying over a few months.

    “This is perhaps not surprising, given that brain structure changes with the environmental demands of learning to juggle (Draganski et al., 2004) or studying (Draganski et al., 2006) over a few months.”

    From The human parental brain: In vivo neuroimaging (2011) · cites this paper as Draganski et al., 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Kempermann, G., Kuhn, H. G., Winkler, J., Buchel, C., & May, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2006-06-07
Volume
26
Issue
23
Pages
6314-6317
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2012130547
Cited by
765
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 51
FWCI
13.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Volkswagen Foundation
  • Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
structural brain plasticity, long-term memory, parietal cortex, hippocampus, medical students, medical examination preparation
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Educational Measurement, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Learning, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuronal Plasticity, Periaqueductal Gray, Students, Medical, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review