Cited by 138Identity, Memory, and TherapyDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

What happens to personal identity when semantic knowledge degrades? A study of the self and autobiographical memory in semantic dementia

Duval, Céline, Desgranges, Béatrice, de La Sayette, Vincent, Belliard, Serge, Eustache, Francis, Piolino, Pascale·2012·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

While the self has been extensively explored in amnesic patients with severe episodic but not semantic memory disturbance, little is known about the self in semantic dementia (SD), which generally features the reverse pattern of impairment. In the present study, we investigated the structural (self-representations) and functional (consciousness) dimensions of the self in a group of eight SD patients in the early to moderate stages of the disease. We used two original tasks designed to probe both structural characteristics, namely the strength and the certainty of self-concept and the episodic/semantic nature of self-representations, and functional characteristics, namely autonoetic/noetic level of consciousness, self-evaluation and self-projection into the past, present and future. Results for the structural self showed impairment on the semantic aspects of the self-representations, except for those related to the present. Moreover, SD patients were affected regardless of the episodic or semantic nature of self-representations into the future. As regards the functional self, self-projection and level of consciousness were only impaired for the future. This study confirms the persistence of a feeling of identity in SD over time for the past and present selves. However, it also highlights the loss of the future self in SD patients. These results are discussed in relation to models of long-term memory and future thinking focusing on the interplay of episodic and semantic memory and mental time travel.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.11.019

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Duval et al. (2012), recall of past self-representations was preserved in semantic dementia, but patients demonstrated significant impairments when thinking about their possible future selves.

    “Whereas recall of past self-representations was preserved, patients with semantic dementia demonstrated significant impairments when thinking about their possible future selves.”
  • The demonstration that semantic memory contributes to the imagining of personal episodic future events, and future self-representations, represents an expansion to the current view of episodic future thinking which, to date, has focused primarily on the role of the medial temporal lobe and episodic memory.

    “The demonstration that semantic memory contributes to the imagining of personal episodic future events, and future selfrepresentations (Duval et al., 2012), represents an expansion to the current view of episodic future thinking which, to date, has focused primarily on the role of the medial temporal lobe and episodic memory (Schacter and Addis, 2007a, b;Race et al., 2011).”
  • Our findings corroborate those from a recent study investigating the link between the self and autobiographical memory in semantic dementia across past, present and future contexts, which also suggests that episodic memory alone may not be sufficient for envisioning the future.

    “Our findings corroborate those from a recent study investigating the link between the self and autobiographical memory in semantic dementia across past, present and future contexts, which also suggests that episodic memory alone may not be sufficient for envisioning the future (Duval et al., 2012).”
  • Taken together, these results highlight the importance of personal semantic information for imagining the future self, and converge with our present findings to show the importance of the semantic memory system for future-oriented thought.

    “Taken together, these results highlight the importance of personal semantic information for imagining the future self (Duval et al. 2012), and converge with our present findings to show the importance of the semantic memory system for future-oriented thought.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duval, C., Desgranges, B., de La Sayette, V., Belliard, S., Eustache, F., & Piolino, P.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Piolino, Pascale
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
254-265
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998729159
Cited by
138
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 14
FWCI
24.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
semantic dementia, personal identity, self-concept, autobiographical memory, semantic memory, episodic memory, future self, self-projection, mental time travel, autonoetic consciousness, self-assessment, long-term memory
MeSH terms
Aged, Consciousness, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory Disorders, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Severity of Illness Index, Positron-Emission Tomography, Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review