CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 55

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Increasing the role of belief information in moral judgments by stimulating the right temporoparietal junction

Sellaro, Roberta, Güroǧlu, Berna, Nitsche, Michael A., van den Wildenberg, Wery P.M., Massaro, Valentina, Durieux, Jeffrey, Hommel, Bernhard, Colzato, Lorenza S.·2015·Neuropsychologia
DOI 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.09.016
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.09.016

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Ambrus, 2012, The fade-in – short stimulation – fade out approach to sham tDCS–reliable at 1mA for naive and experienced subjects, but not investigators, Brain Stimul., 5, 499, 10.1016/j.brs.2011.12.001 · DOI
  2. Baird, 2004, The role of mental state understanding in the development of moral cognition and moral action, New Dir. Child Adolesc. Dev., 103, 37, 10.1002/cd.96 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Brunoni, 2012, Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions, Brain Stimul., 5, 175, 10.1016/j.brs.2011.03.002 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Colzato, 2008, Stress modulation of visuomotor binding, Neuropsychologia, 46, 1542, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.006 · DOI
  5. Colzato, 2011, Khat use is associated with impaired working memory and cognitive flexibility, PloS One, 6, e20602, 10.1371/journal.pone.0020602 · DOI
  6. Cushman, 2008, Crime and punishment: distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment, Cognition, 108, 353, 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cushman, 2013, The development of intent-based moral judgment, Cognition, 127, 6, 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.008 · DOI
  8. Cushman, 2006, The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment testing three principles of harm, Psychol. Sci., 17, 1082, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01834.x · DOI
  9. Dayan, 2013, Noninvasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back, Nat. Neurosci., 16, 838, 10.1038/nn.3422 · DOI
  10. Filmer, 2014, Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation for understanding brain function, Trends Neurosci., 37, 742, 10.1016/j.tins.2014.08.003 · DOI
  11. Fregni, 2008, Cortical stimulation of the prefrontal cortex with transcranial direct current stimulation reduces cue-provoked smoking craving: a randomized, sham-controlled study, J. Clin. Psychiatry, 69, 32, 10.4088/JCP.v69n0105 · DOI
  12. Fumagalli, 2012, Functional and clinical neuroanatomy of morality, Brain, 135, 2006, 10.1093/brain/awr334 · DOI
  13. Fumagalli, 2010, Brain switches utilitarian behavior: does gender make the difference, PLoS One, 5, e8865, 10.1371/journal.pone.0008865 · DOI
  14. Gandiga, 2006, Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation, Clin. Neurophysiol., 117, 845, 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
  15. George, 2009, Noninvasive techniques for probing neurocircuitry and treating illness: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Neuropsychopharmacology, 35, 301, 10.1038/npp.2009.87 · DOI
  16. Greene, 2004, The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment, Neuron, 44, 389, 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Greene, 2001, An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment, Science, 293, 2105, 10.1126/science.1062872 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Karim, 2010, The truth about lying: inhibition of the anterior prefrontal cortex improves deceptive behavior, Cereb. Cortex, 20, 205, 10.1093/cercor/bhp090 · DOI
  19. Klein, 2013, Bilateral bi-cephalic tDCS with two active electrodes of the same polarity modulates bilateral cognitive processes differentially, PloS One, 8, e71607, 10.1371/journal.pone.0071607 · DOI
  20. Kliemann, 2008, The influence of prior record on moral judgment, Neuropsychologia, 46, 2949, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.010 · DOI
  21. Koster-Hale, 2013, Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 5648, 10.1073/pnas.1207992110 · DOI
  22. Miranda, 2006, Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation, Clin. Neurophysiol., 117, 1623, 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.04.009 · DOI
  23. Moll, 2011, Impairment of prosocial sentiments is associated with frontopolar and septal damage in frontotemporal dementia, Neuroimage, 54, 1735, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.026 · DOI
  24. Moran, 2011, Impaired theory of mind for moral judgment in high-functioning autism, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 2688, 10.1073/pnas.1011734108 · DOI
  25. Nadelhoffer, 2006, Bad acts, blameworthy agents, and intentional actions: some problems for juror impartiality, Philos. Explor., 9, 203, 10.1080/13869790600641905 · DOI
  26. Nasseri, 2015, A framework for categorizing electrode montages in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Front. Hum. Neurosci., 9, 54, 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00054 · DOI
  27. Nichols, 2002, Norms with feeling: towards a psychological account of moral judgment, Cognition, 84, 221, 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00048-3 · DOI
  28. Nitsche, 2007, Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex, J. Neurophysiol., 97, 3109, 10.1152/jn.01312.2006 · DOI
  29. Nitsche, 2003, Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation—technical, safety and functional aspects, Suppl. Clin. Neurophysiol., 56, 255, 10.1016/S1567-424X(09)70230-2 · DOI
  30. Nitsche, 2000, Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation, J. Physiol., 527, 633, 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. Nitsche, 2001, Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans, Neurology, 57, 1899, 10.1212/WNL.57.10.1899 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Nitsche, 2011, Transcranial direct current stimulation–update 2011, Restor. Neurol. Neurosci., 29, 463
  33. Nozari, 2014, Consequences of cathodal stimulation for behavior: when does it help and when does it hurt performance?, PLoS One, 9, e84338, 10.1371/journal.pone.0084338 · DOI
  34. Page, 2006, What can't functional neuroimaging tell the cognitive psychologist?, Cortex, 42, 428, 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70375-7 · DOI
  35. Palm, 2013, Evaluation of sham transcranial direct current stimulation for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials, Brain Stimul., 6, 690, 10.1016/j.brs.2013.01.005 · DOI
  36. Pascual-Leone, 2000, Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience–virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 10, 232, 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00081-7 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Patil, 2014, Alexithymia increases moral acceptability of accidental harms, J. Cogn. Psychol., 26, 597, 10.1080/20445911.2014.929137 · DOI
  38. Paulus, 2011, Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES-tDCS; tRNS, tACS) methods, Neuropsychol. Rehabil., 21, 602, 10.1080/09602011.2011.557292 · DOI
  39. Perner, 2006, Thinking of mental and other representations: the roles of left and right temporo-parietal junction, Soc. Neurosci., 1, 245, 10.1080/17470910600989896 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Pirulli, 2014, Is neural hyperpolarization by cathodal stimulation always detrimental at the behavioral level?, Front. Behav. Neurosci., 8, 226, 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00226 · DOI
  41. Poldrack, 2008, The role of fMRI in cognitive neuroscience: where do we stand?, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 18, 223, 10.1016/j.conb.2008.07.006 · DOI
  42. Poreisz, 2007, Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients, Brain Res. Bull., 72, 208, 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.01.004 · DOI
  43. Premack, 1978, Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?, Behav. Brain Sci., 1, 515, 10.1017/S0140525X00076512 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Ruby, 2003, What you believe versus what you think they believe: a neuroimaging study of conceptual perspective‐taking, Eur. J. Neurosci., 17, 2475, 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02673.x · DOI · Paper page
  45. Santiesteban, 2012, Enhancing social ability by stimulating right temporoparietal junction, Curr. Biol., 22, 2274, 10.1016/j.cub.2012.10.018 · DOI
  46. Saxe, 2004, Understanding other minds: linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 55, 87, 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142044 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Shafi, 2012, Exploration and modulation of brain network interactions with noninvasive brain stimulation in combination with neuroimaging, Eu. J. Neurosci., 35, 805, 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08035.x · DOI
  48. Sheehan, 1998, The mini-international neuropsychiatric interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10, J. Clin. Psychiatry, 59, 22
  49. Shultz, 1986, Assignment of moral responsibility and punishment, Child Dev., 57, 177, 10.2307/1130649 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Stagg, 2011, Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation, Neuroscientist, 17, 37, 10.1177/1073858410386614 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Vogeley, 2001, Mind reading: neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective, NeuroImage, 14, 170, 10.1006/nimg.2001.0789 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Wagner, 2007, Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study, Neuroimage, 35, 1113, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.027 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Woolfolk, 2006, Identification, situational constraint, and social cognition: Studies in the attribution of moral responsibility, Cognition, 100, 283, 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.002 · DOI
  54. Young, 2010, Damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex impairs judgment of harmful intent, Neuron, 65, 845, 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.003 · DOI
  55. Young, 2010, Disruption of the right temporoparietal junction with transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces the role of beliefs in moral judgments, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6753, 10.1073/pnas.0914826107 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Young, 2006, Does emotion mediate the relationship between an action's moral status and its intentional status? Neuropsychological evidence, J. Cognit. Cult., 6, 265, 10.1163/156853706776931312 · DOI
  57. Young, 2012, Where in the brain is morality? Everywhere and maybe nowhere, Soc. Neurosci., 7, 1, 10.1080/17470919.2011.569146 · DOI
  58. Young, 2012, Psychopathy increases perceived moral permissibility of accidents, J. Abnorm. Psychol., 121, 659, 10.1037/a0027489 · DOI
  59. Young, 2010, Investigating the neural and cognitive basis of moral luck: it's not what you do but what you know, Rev. Philos. Psychol., 1, 333, 10.1007/s13164-010-0027-y · DOI
  60. Young, 2008, The neural basis of belief encoding and integration in moral judgment, NeuroImage, 40, 1912, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.057 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Yuill, 1988, Intentionality and knowledge in children's judgments of actor's responsibility and recipient's emotional reaction, Dev. Psychol., 24, 358, 10.1037/0012-1649.24.3.358 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Zelazo, 1996, Intention, act, and outcome in behavioral prediction and moral judgment, Child Dev., 67, 2478, 10.2307/1131635 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 55

Metadata

Authors
Sellaro, R., Güroǧlu, B., Nitsche, M. A., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Massaro, V., Durieux, J., Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S.
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
77
Pages
400-408
ISSN
0028-3932
DOI
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.09.016
Cited by
55
References
12
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (#452-12-001)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review