Cited by 65Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorNostalgia and Consumer BehaviorSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Nostalgia buffers the negative impact of low procedural justice on cooperation

van Dijke, Marius, Wildschut, Tim, Leunissen, Joost M., Sedikides, Constantine·2015·Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.11.005

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experimentally induced nostalgia buffers the negative consequences of procedural injustice in organizations, strengthening cooperative attitudes.

    “Further, experimentally induced nostalgia buffers the negative consequences of procedural injustice in organizations, strengthening cooperative attitudes30.”
  • Nostalgia promotes prosocial attitudes and behaviors, such as cooperation, charitable donations, and prejudice reduction.

    “Third, nostalgia promotes prosocial attitudes and behaviors, such as cooperation30,50, charitable donations51,52, and prejudice reduction53–56, all of which can be perceived as sociomoral concerns linked to moral values57.”
  • Nostalgia strengthens social connectedness.

    “Nostalgia also strengthens social connectedness (Routledge et al., 2011;Van Dijke, Wildschut, Leunissen, & Sedikides, 2015).”

    From Nostalgia-Evoked Inspiration: Mediating Mechanisms and Motivational Implications (2015) · cites this paper as Van Dijke, Wildschut, Leunissen, & Sedikides, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 104 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Dijke, M., Wildschut, T., Leunissen, J. M., & Sedikides, C.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Venue
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
127
Pages
15-29
ISSN
0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966554931
Cited by
65
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4
FWCI
8.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
nostalgia, procedural justice, organizational citizenship behavior, cooperation with authorities, social connectedness, buffering effect, coping, discrete emotions, employee-organization relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review