A highly efficient human pluripotent stem cell microglia model displays a neuronal-co-culture-specific expression profile and inflammatory response
Open accessAbstract
Microglia are increasingly implicated in brain pathology, particularly neurodegenerative disease, with many genes implicated in Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and motor neuron disease expressed in microglia. There is, therefore, a need for authentic, efficient in vitro models to study human microglial pathological mechanisms. Microglia originate from the yolk sac as MYB-independent macrophages, migrating into the developing brain to complete differentiation. Here, we recapitulate microglial ontogeny by highly efficient differentiation of embryonic MYB-independent iPSC-derived macrophages then co-culture them with iPSC-derived cortical neurons. Co-cultures retain neuronal maturity and functionality for many weeks. Co-culture microglia express key microglia-specific markers and neurodegenerative disease-relevant genes, develop highly dynamic ramifications, and are phagocytic. Upon activation they become more ameboid, releasing multiple microglia-relevant cytokines. Importantly, co-culture microglia downregulate pathogen-response pathways, upregulate homeostatic function pathways, and promote a more anti-inflammatory and pro-remodeling cytokine response than corresponding monocultures, demonstrating that co-cultures are preferable for modeling authentic microglial physiology.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper establishes a highly efficient human iPSC-derived microglia–neuron co-culture model that recapitulates embryonic microglial ontogeny and yields cells with a fetal microglia-like transcriptome, dynamic ramified morphology, phagocytic capacity, and inflammatory responses. Co-culture microglia downregulate pathogen-response pathways and show a more anti-inflammatory/pro-remodeling cytokine profile than monocultures.
Key findings
- iPSC-derived macrophage precursors were generated at a cumulative yield 10- to 43-fold higher than input iPSCs, and co-culture with iPSC cortical neurons produced ramified microglia-like cells that persisted for at least 42 days while neurons maintained spontaneous electrical activity.
- Co-culture microglia expressed key microglia markers and neurodegenerative disease-relevant genes, clustered with human cortex myeloid cells and fetal microglia, and downregulated type I interferon, TLR1/TLR2, and antigen-presentation pathways while upregulating differentiation, chemotaxis/migration, cell-cell adhesion, and metal ion response pathways.
- Co-culture microglia were motile, moving an accumulated distance of 251 ± 21 μm over 5 hr versus 119 ± 6 μm for pMGL and 53 ± 11 μm for pMac; upon LPS stimulation they clustered and adopted ameboid morphology, with blinded activated-morphology scores increasing from 4.1 ± 0.6 at 0 hr to 7.6 ± 1.1 at 10 hr and 8.1 ± 0.8 at 20 hr.
- In cytokine assays, co-culture microglia showed dampened chemokine/cytokine secretion versus pMGL but significantly higher activated levels of SerpinE1, VEGF-A, and anti-inflammatory IL-10, indicating co-culture-specific anti-inflammatory and pro-remodeling responses.
Methods
- iPSCs from four donors were differentiated into embryonic-like, MYB-independent macrophage precursors using defined-size embryoid bodies with BMP4, VEGF, and SCF, followed by M-CSF and IL-3; precursors were harvested weekly from supernatant.
- Precursors were co-cultured with iPSC-derived cortical neurons in Advanced DMEM/F12 + N2 with 100 ng/mL IL-34 and optional 10 ng/mL GM-CSF; assays were mostly performed after 2 weeks of co-culture.
- Characterization included Illumina HT12v4 transcriptome analysis against fetal microglia, pMGL, pMac, pMacpre, and blood monocytes; qRT-PCR; flow cytometry; live imaging; phagocytosis assays; and cytokine profiling by Proteome Profiler (102 cytokines) and Luminex multiplex array (22 cytokines).
Limitations
- The paper does not state a formal limitations section; evident limitations from the text include that co-pMG isolated with CD11b beads showed a weak neural cell signature, and TMEM119/P2RY12 antibody staining in co-culture had background staining.
- HLA-DR was undetectable in all PSC-derived myeloid lineages, reflecting unprimed culture conditions, and qRT-PCR comparison with adult human microglia used n = 1 cultured and n = 1 directly isolated/processed sample with technical triplicates.
- Most assays were conducted after 2 weeks of co-culture because neuronal progenitors continued to proliferate and increase culture density, while co-pMG proliferation was very low.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
12 of 51 cited sources checked · 8 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
All the cell types in the current study cluster with human cortex myeloid cells and not with cortical oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, neurons, or endothelial cells.
“Comparison with a previously published expression dataset for cells derived from human brain tissue (Zhang et al., 2016) showed that all the cell types in the current study cluster with human cortex myeloid cells and not with cortical oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, neurons, or endothelial cells (Figure 2B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2016 source
- Findingown data
Genes previously identified to be associated specifically with microglia but not with blood monocytes showed similar expression in co-pMG and fetalMG.
“As a set, genes previously identified to be associated specifically with microglia but not with blood monocytes (Bennett et al., 2016, Butovsky et al., 2014, Melief et al., 2012) (Figure 2C) showed similar expression in co-pMG and fetalMG.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Microglia rapidly lose their unique identity when removed from the brain environment and cultured in monoculture in vitro.
“Moreover, microglia rapidly lose their unique identity when removed from the brain environment and cultured in monoculture in vitro (Butovsky et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Butovsky et al., 2014 source
In Results (‘Microglia cell lines do not express a microglia signature’; page not provided), the paper reports that primary cultured newborn microglia and microglial cell lines did not express the adult microglial signature. It does not establish that microglia rapidly lose that identity upon removal from the brain: newborn microglia were not shown to have first acquired the adult signature, and another Results section reports that adult microglia cultured with MCSF and TGF-β1 closely resembled freshly isolated cells. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premiseown data
Our protocol yield is 10-43 per starting iPSC, versus 0.5-4 for Muffat et al. (2016) and Pandya et al. (2017).
“It is robust and efficient: time frame 1 month, versus 2 months for Muffat et al. (2016); yield 10–43 per starting iPSC for our protocol, versus 0.5–4 for Muffat et al. (2016) and Pandya et al. (2017); manipulation consisting of once-weekly feeding of differentiation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Microglia derive from primitive, yolk sac macrophages that migrate into the developing brain.
“Our own work (Buchrieser et al., 2017) and that of others (Hoeffel et al., 2015) indicates that this protocol produces MYB-independent myeloid cells, recapitulating an embryonic ontogeny, and lineage-tracking studies in mouse have demonstrated that microglia derive from primitive, yolk sac macrophages that migrate into the developing brain (Ginhoux et al., 2010, Ginhoux et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
- Findingown data
These markers did not increase in a consistent way during the time course of the co-cultures.
“These markers did not increase in a consistent way during the time course of the co-cultures (Figures S5C–S5E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Neuronal progenitors present in the cultures continued to proliferate, leading to an increase in the density of the cultures.
“Neuronal progenitors present in the cultures continued to proliferate, leading to an increase in the density of the cultures, whereas proliferation, as assessed by Ki-67 staining, was very low in co-pMG (similar to pMGL and pMac, Figures S1H–S1K).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Co-culture microglia develop highly dynamic ramifications.
“Co-culture microglia express key microglia-specific markers and neurodegenerative disease-relevant genes, develop highly dynamic ramifications, and are phagocytic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Several HLA genes showed higher expression in the bloodMono samples.
“FLT3, a marker of definitive hematopoiesis, showed higher expression in the bloodMono samples (5.5-fold, adjusted p < 2.4 × 10−8), along with several HLA genes, in agreement with blood monocytes exposure to priming cytokines in the blood and their role in antigen presentation to T cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Co-culture microglia express key microglia-specific markers.
“Co-culture microglia express key microglia-specific markers and neurodegenerative disease-relevant genes, develop highly dynamic ramifications, and are phagocytic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In microglia medium and in co-culture with iPSC cortical neurons, pMacpre adopted ramified microglial morphology with secondary branching within 2 weeks.
“In microglia medium and in co-culture with iPSC cortical neurons (pNeurons), pMacpre adopted ramified microglial morphology with secondary branching within 2 weeks (Figures 1C and 1D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Human microglial ontogeny processes are analogous to those in mice.
- Findingown data
Co-cultures retain neuronal maturity and functionality for many weeks.
“Co-cultures retain neuronal maturity and functionality for many weeks.”
- Also stated in: § Co-culture Is Compatible with iPSC Cortical Neuronal Maturation and Function · hedged
“Co-culture could be extended for at least 42 days, during which time neurons maintained spontaneous electrical activity at least as well as neurons cultured alone (Figure S1E), and calcium flux was observable upon addition of potassium ions (Movie S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Co-culture Is Compatible with iPSC Cortical Neuronal Maturation and Function · hedged
- Findingown data
Unstimulated co-pMG retained roughly territorial surveillance behavior over the whole imaging period.
“Unstimulated co-pMG retained roughly territorial surveillance behavior over the whole imaging period (Movie S5), suggesting no imaging-induced activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The cumulative yield of pMacpre for the lines used in this study was 10- to 43-fold higher than the number of input iPSCs.
“The cumulative yield of pMacpre for the lines used in this study was 10- to 43-fold higher than the number of input iPSCs, consistent with yields previously reported for this protocol (van Wilgenburg et al., 2013), similar to a recently published hiPS-microglia protocol (typically 40-fold) (Abud et al., 2017), and 10-fold higher than two other recently published hiPS-microglia protocols (0.5- to 4”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
IBA1 was readily detectable in co-pMG by immunocytochemistry.
“IBA1 (a cytoplasmic calcium-binding protein associated with myeloid cells, particularly microglia) was readily detectable in co-pMG by immunocytochemistry (Figures 1B and 1C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Co-culture microglia are phagocytic.
“Co-culture microglia express key microglia-specific markers and neurodegenerative disease-relevant genes, develop highly dynamic ramifications, and are phagocytic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Gene ontology analysis identified biological processes with significant enrichment in these gene sets, demonstrating that co-pMG downregulate genes in pathways associated with type I interferon responses, Toll-like receptor 1 (TLR1) and TLR2 signaling, and antigen presentation, relative to the monoculture populations.
“Gene ontology analysis identified biological processes with significant enrichment in these gene sets, demonstrating that co-pMG downregulate genes in pathways associated with type I interferon responses (involved in antiviral responses), Toll-like receptor 1 (TLR1) and TLR2 signaling (bacterial and yeast recognition), and antigen presentation, relative to the monoculture populations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Co-culture microglia downregulate pathogen-response pathways.
“Importantly, co-culture microglia downregulate pathogen-response pathways, upregulate homeostatic function pathways, and promote a more anti-inflammatory and pro-remodeling cytokine response than corresponding monocultures, demonstrating that co-cultures are preferable for modeling authentic microglial physiology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CD11b, CD14, and CD45 were expressed on all PSC-derived macrophage and microglia.
“Flow cytometry with directly conjugated antibodies showed CD11b (integrin alpha M, a marker for mature myeloid cells and a subunit of the complement receptor, CR3, also known as Mac-1), CD14 (a component of the receptor for bacterial lipopolysaccharide [LPS]), and CD45 (a pan-leukocyte marker and tyrosine phosphatase which dephosphorylates several receptor tyrosine kinases), were expressed on all”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
co-pMG had comparable levels of expression of these microglial genes with cultured adult human microglia and with directly processed adult human microglia.
“These expression profiles were confirmed by qRT-PCR (Figure 2D), which also showed that co-pMG had comparable levels of expression of these microglial genes with cultured adult human microglia and with directly processed adult human microglia, and that while blood monocyte-derived macrophages also upregulated several of these genes, they mostly did not reach the same expression level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
co-pMG persisted within the extended-duration cultures, maintaining expected density to at least day 39.
“Nonetheless, co-pMG persisted within the extended-duration cultures, maintaining expected density to at least day 39 (Figure S2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Genes upregulated in co-pMG were enriched for biological processes including differentiation, chemotaxis/migration, regulation of cell-cell adhesion, and metal ion response.
“Meanwhile, genes upregulated in co-pMG were enriched for biological processes including differentiation, chemotaxis/migration, regulation of cell-cell adhesion, and metal ion response (Hancock et al., 2014), all of which would be important for microglia to carry out their homeostatic surveillance and clearing functions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hancock et al., 2014 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Findingown data
Co-culture microglia promote a more anti-inflammatory and pro-remodeling cytokine response than corresponding monocultures.
“Importantly, co-culture microglia downregulate pathogen-response pathways, upregulate homeostatic function pathways, and promote a more anti-inflammatory and pro-remodeling cytokine response than corresponding monocultures, demonstrating that co-cultures are preferable for modeling authentic microglial physiology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
HLA-DR was undetectable in any PSC-derived myeloid lineages, reflecting the unprimed culture conditions.
“HLA-DR (a major histocompatibility complex [MHC] class II antigen) was undetectable in any PSC-derived myeloid lineages, reflecting the unprimed culture conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
MAF showed higher expression in pMacpre (21.7-fold, adjusted p < 7.8 × 10−7).
“Meanwhile MAF, a known marker of primitive hematopoiesis, showed higher expression in pMacpre (21.7-fold, adjusted p < 7.8 × 10−7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Calcium flux was observable upon addition of potassium ions in co-cultures.
“Co-culture could be extended for at least 42 days, during which time neurons maintained spontaneous electrical activity at least as well as neurons cultured alone (Figure S1E), and calcium flux was observable upon addition of potassium ions (Movie S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Proliferation, as assessed by Ki-67 staining, was very low in co-pMG, similar to pMGL and pMac.
“Neuronal progenitors present in the cultures continued to proliferate, leading to an increase in the density of the cultures, whereas proliferation, as assessed by Ki-67 staining, was very low in co-pMG (similar to pMGL and pMac, Figures S1H–S1K).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Co-pMG were dependent on CSF1R ligand delivery in the culture medium for persistence in co-culture, as withdrawal of IL-34 led to depletion of co-pMG.
“Co-pMG were dependent on CSF1R ligand delivery in the culture medium for persistence in co-culture, as withdrawal of IL-34 led to depletion of co-pMG (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Almost all of these genes were also expressed in pMacpre, pMac, and pMGL.
“Note that almost all of these genes were also expressed in pMacpre, pMac, and pMGL.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Pre- and postsynaptic markers (Synaptophysin and PSD95) were observable in neuronal monocultures and in co-cultures.
“Pre- and postsynaptic markers (Synaptophysin and PSD95) were observable in neuronal monocultures and in co-cultures (Figures S1F and S1G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Co-culture microglia express neurodegenerative disease-relevant genes.
“Co-culture microglia express key microglia-specific markers and neurodegenerative disease-relevant genes, develop highly dynamic ramifications, and are phagocytic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
qRT-PCR confirmed the expression profiles of microglial genes.
“These expression profiles were confirmed by qRT-PCR (Figure 2D), which also showed that co-pMG had comparable levels of expression of these microglial genes with cultured adult human microglia and with directly processed adult human microglia, and that while blood monocyte-derived macrophages also upregulated several of these genes, they mostly did not reach the same expression level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Within 5 hr of LPS stimulation, co-pMG migrated to form clusters.
“In contrast, within 5 hr LPS-stimulated co-pMG migrated to form clusters, and some microglia had reduced ramifications and increased area-to-perimeter ratio, indicative of transition to activated, ameboid microglia (Figures 6A–6C and Movie S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Based on their first two principal components, the samples separated into three distinct groups comprised of bloodMono, pMacpre, and pMac, pMGL, co-pMG, and fetalMG.
“Based on their first two principal components, the samples separated into three distinct groups comprised of (1) bloodMono, (2) pMacpre, and (3) pMac, pMGL, co-pMG, and fetalMG (Figure 2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Co-culture microglia upregulate homeostatic function pathways.
“Importantly, co-culture microglia downregulate pathogen-response pathways, upregulate homeostatic function pathways, and promote a more anti-inflammatory and pro-remodeling cytokine response than corresponding monocultures, demonstrating that co-cultures are preferable for modeling authentic microglial physiology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
FLT3 showed higher expression in the bloodMono samples (5.5-fold, adjusted p < 2.4 × 10−8).
“FLT3, a marker of definitive hematopoiesis, showed higher expression in the bloodMono samples (5.5-fold, adjusted p < 2.4 × 10−8), along with several HLA genes, in agreement with blood monocytes exposure to priming cytokines in the blood and their role in antigen presentation to T cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Co-culture neurons expressed both deep-layer (TBR1) and upper-layer (SatB2) cortical identity markers.
“Finally, co-culture neurons expressed both deep-layer (TBR1) and upper-layer (SatB2) cortical identity markers (Figure S2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Live imaging revealed a dynamically remodeled ramified morphology, every 5-min and even 12-s frame revealing changes to primary and secondary branching.
“Live imaging revealed a dynamically remodeled ramified morphology, every 5-min and even 12-s frame revealing changes to primary and secondary branching (Movies S2 and S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Co-pMG are phagocytic.
“Co-pMG are phagocytic, adopt a highly dynamic ramified microglia-like morphology, upon activation display an activated morphology, and release a battery of microglia-relevant cytokines, with co-culture promoting a more anti-inflammatory and pro-remodeling cytokine response than corresponding monocultures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
VEGF-A was significantly higher in activated co-culture versus monoculture.
“Interestingly, SerpinE1 (a serine protease inhibitor that inhibits fibrinolysis) and VEGF-A (stimulates angiogenesis) were significantly higher in activated co-culture versus monoculture, suggesting that tissue remodeling factors are specifically induced in co-culture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
IL-10 was significantly increased in activated co-culture versus monocultures.
“Meanwhile, IL-10, which is anti-inflammatory, was significantly increased in activated co-culture versus monocultures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Co-culture induces a unique cytokine profile which is not the sum of monocultures.
“Finally, we show that co-culture induces a unique cytokine profile which is not the sum of monocultures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Co-pMG express neurodegenerative disease-relevant genes.
“They express key human microglia-specific markers and neurodegenerative disease-relevant genes, upregulate homeostatic pathways, downregulate pathogen-response pathways, and exhibit a transcriptional profile similar to that of fetal microglia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Co-pMG exhibit a transcriptional profile similar to that of fetal microglia.
“They express key human microglia-specific markers and neurodegenerative disease-relevant genes, upregulate homeostatic pathways, downregulate pathogen-response pathways, and exhibit a transcriptional profile similar to that of fetal microglia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Stimulated neurons secreted IL-6, IL-8, and a subset of chemokines.
“Unstimulated neurons secreted only macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and VEGF-A, and when stimulated secreted IL-6, IL-8, and a subset of chemokines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
SerpinE1 was significantly higher in activated co-culture versus monoculture.
“Interestingly, SerpinE1 (a serine protease inhibitor that inhibits fibrinolysis) and VEGF-A (stimulates angiogenesis) were significantly higher in activated co-culture versus monoculture, suggesting that tissue remodeling factors are specifically induced in co-culture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Co-pMG downregulate pathogen-response pathways.
“They express key human microglia-specific markers and neurodegenerative disease-relevant genes, upregulate homeostatic pathways, downregulate pathogen-response pathways, and exhibit a transcriptional profile similar to that of fetal microglia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Some LPS-stimulated co-pMG had reduced ramifications and increased area-to-perimeter ratio.
“In contrast, within 5 hr LPS-stimulated co-pMG migrated to form clusters, and some microglia had reduced ramifications and increased area-to-perimeter ratio, indicative of transition to activated, ameboid microglia (Figures 6A–6C and Movie S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Blinded morphology scoring showed a significant increase in the proportion of cells with activated morphology in LPS-treated cultures in six analyzed videos.
“Blinded morphology scoring showed a significant increase in the proportion of cells with activated morphology in LPS-treated cultures in six analyzed videos (time point mean ± SEM: 0 hr, 4.1 ± 0.6; 10 hr, 7.6 ± 1.1; 20 hr, 8.1 ± 0.8; Figure 6E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Co-pMG displayed an overall dampened secretion of chemokines and cytokines versus pMGL, both constitutive and induced.
“Co-pMG displayed an overall dampened secretion of chemokines and cytokines versus pMGL, both constitutive and induced.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Co-pMG upregulate homeostatic pathways.
“They express key human microglia-specific markers and neurodegenerative disease-relevant genes, upregulate homeostatic pathways, downregulate pathogen-response pathways, and exhibit a transcriptional profile similar to that of fetal microglia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
pMGL had a higher baseline number of cytokines secreted.
“pMGL had a higher baseline number of cytokines secreted, and upregulated most cytokines upon stimulation (except IL-23A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Clustering measured as distance to nearest neighbor showed a leftward shift in curves for LPS-treated cultures.
“Clustering was measured as distance to nearest neighbor, showing a leftward shift (i.e., smaller distance) in curves for LPS-treated cultures, indicative of the clustering clearly observable by eye (Figure 6D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
GM-CSF did not account for the difference in cytokine profile, as its absence did not significantly change the cytokine profile of pMGL.
“GM-CSF did not account for this difference, as its absence did not significantly change the cytokine profile of pMGL (Figure S6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Unstimulated neurons secreted only MIF and VEGF-A.
“Unstimulated neurons secreted only macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and VEGF-A, and when stimulated secreted IL-6, IL-8, and a subset of chemokines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Co-pMG adopt a highly dynamic ramified microglia-like morphology.
“Co-pMG are phagocytic, adopt a highly dynamic ramified microglia-like morphology, upon activation display an activated morphology, and release a battery of microglia-relevant cytokines, with co-culture promoting a more anti-inflammatory and pro-remodeling cytokine response than corresponding monocultures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
pMGL upregulated most cytokines upon stimulation, except IL-23A.
“pMGL had a higher baseline number of cytokines secreted, and upregulated most cytokines upon stimulation (except IL-23A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Upon activation, co-pMG display an activated morphology.
“Co-pMG are phagocytic, adopt a highly dynamic ramified microglia-like morphology, upon activation display an activated morphology, and release a battery of microglia-relevant cytokines, with co-culture promoting a more anti-inflammatory and pro-remodeling cytokine response than corresponding monocultures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
pMac secreted very few cytokines constitutively (MIP1α and MIPβ, CXCL1 and CXCL10, IL-8, and MIF).
“pMac secreted very few cytokines constitutively (macrophage inflammatory protein 1α [MIP1α] and MIPβ, CXCL1 and CXCL10, IL-8, and MIF), but secreted the entire panel of 22 cytokines upon stimulation, in concordance with our previous publication (which also includes comparison with blood monocyte-derived macrophages [Jiang et al., 2012]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jiang et al., 2012 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Findingown data
Co-pMG express key human microglia-specific markers.
“They express key human microglia-specific markers and neurodegenerative disease-relevant genes, upregulate homeostatic pathways, downregulate pathogen-response pathways, and exhibit a transcriptional profile similar to that of fetal microglia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Key microglia genes are often also expressed in pMacpre, pMac, and pMGL.
“This reveals that while key microglia genes are expressed in co-pMG, they are often also expressed in pMacpre, pMac, and pMGL, indicating that such genes may be features of primitive macrophages rather than being microglia specific, and that comparison only with blood monocytes/macrophages does not give a complete interpretation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Co-pMG release a battery of microglia-relevant cytokines.
“Co-pMG are phagocytic, adopt a highly dynamic ramified microglia-like morphology, upon activation display an activated morphology, and release a battery of microglia-relevant cytokines, with co-culture promoting a more anti-inflammatory and pro-remodeling cytokine response than corresponding monocultures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
pMac secreted the entire panel of 22 cytokines upon stimulation.
“pMac secreted very few cytokines constitutively (macrophage inflammatory protein 1α [MIP1α] and MIPβ, CXCL1 and CXCL10, IL-8, and MIF), but secreted the entire panel of 22 cytokines upon stimulation, in concordance with our previous publication (which also includes comparison with blood monocyte-derived macrophages [Jiang et al., 2012]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jiang et al., 2012 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Findingnone given
Our iPSC microglia transcribe key genes involved in AD, PD, and MND.
“Our iPSC microglia transcribe key genes involved in AD, PD, and MND.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Key microglia genes are expressed in co-pMG.
“This reveals that while key microglia genes are expressed in co-pMG, they are often also expressed in pMacpre, pMac, and pMGL, indicating that such genes may be features of primitive macrophages rather than being microglia specific, and that comparison only with blood monocytes/macrophages does not give a complete interpretation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Co-culture with neurons downregulates responses to external pathogens.
“This implies that co-culture with neurons downregulates responses to external pathogens.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The bloodMono and pMacpre samples showed an orthogonal separation from the macrophage and microglia samples that is in line with the different developmental origins of these cells.
“The bloodMono and pMacpre samples showed an orthogonal separation from the macrophage and microglia samples that is in line with the different developmental origins of these cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The co-culture system is a relevant model to study the effects of numerous genes associated with neurodegenerative disease.
“Together, this shows that our co-culture system is a relevant model to study the effects of numerous genes associated with neurodegenerative disease, and that monoculture pMac or pMGL can be useful for answering specific disease gene-related questions where co-culture is impractical.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Human microglial ontogeny processes are analogous to those in mice.
- Interpretationcitation
These upregulated processes are important for microglia to carry out their homeostatic surveillance and clearing functions.
“Meanwhile, genes upregulated in co-pMG were enriched for biological processes including differentiation, chemotaxis/migration, regulation of cell-cell adhesion, and metal ion response (Hancock et al., 2014), all of which would be important for microglia to carry out their homeostatic surveillance and clearing functions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Co-cultures are preferable for modeling authentic microglial physiology.
“Importantly, co-culture microglia downregulate pathogen-response pathways, upregulate homeostatic function pathways, and promote a more anti-inflammatory and pro-remodeling cytokine response than corresponding monocultures, demonstrating that co-cultures are preferable for modeling authentic microglial physiology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Fresh primary human microglia are very limited in availability and cannot be propagated.
- Interpretationown data
Monoculture pMac or pMGL can be useful for answering specific disease gene-related questions where co-culture is impractical.
“Together, this shows that our co-culture system is a relevant model to study the effects of numerous genes associated with neurodegenerative disease, and that monoculture pMac or pMGL can be useful for answering specific disease gene-related questions where co-culture is impractical.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This indicates the competent development of mature phagosomes in co-pMG.
“pH-sensitive fluorescent zymosan particles added to co-cultures became visible inside co-pMG, within 1 hr, comparable with pMac (Movie S4), indicating the competent development of mature phagosomes in co-pMG.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Imaging did not induce activation in unstimulated co-pMG.
“Unstimulated co-pMG retained roughly territorial surveillance behavior over the whole imaging period (Movie S5), suggesting no imaging-induced activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Comparison only with blood monocytes/macrophages does not give a complete interpretation.
“This reveals that while key microglia genes are expressed in co-pMG, they are often also expressed in pMacpre, pMac, and pMGL, indicating that such genes may be features of primitive macrophages rather than being microglia specific, and that comparison only with blood monocytes/macrophages does not give a complete interpretation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Our protocol has a time frame of 1 month, versus 2 months for Muffat et al. (2016).
“It is robust and efficient: time frame 1 month, versus 2 months for Muffat et al. (2016); yield 10–43 per starting iPSC for our protocol, versus 0.5–4 for Muffat et al. (2016) and Pandya et al. (2017); manipulation consisting of once-weekly feeding of differentiation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Muffat et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
LPS-stimulated co-pMG transitioned to activated, ameboid microglia.
“In contrast, within 5 hr LPS-stimulated co-pMG migrated to form clusters, and some microglia had reduced ramifications and increased area-to-perimeter ratio, indicative of transition to activated, ameboid microglia (Figures 6A–6C and Movie S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Only our protocol has direct evidence by gene knockout for producing MYB-independent primitive macrophages.
“However, only our protocol has direct evidence by gene knockout for producing MYB-independent primitive macrophages (Buchrieser et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Buchrieser et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Tissue remodeling factors are specifically induced in co-culture.
“Interestingly, SerpinE1 (a serine protease inhibitor that inhibits fibrinolysis) and VEGF-A (stimulates angiogenesis) were significantly higher in activated co-culture versus monoculture, suggesting that tissue remodeling factors are specifically induced in co-culture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The paper established a highly efficient in vitro human iPSC-derived microglia-neuron co-culture model.
“We have established a highly efficient in vitro human iPSC-derived microglia-neuron co-culture model, which recapitulates the ontogenetic development of microglia in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Co-culture induces specific anti-inflammatory and pro-remodeling responses not seen in corresponding monocultures.
“Together, these results indicate that co-culture induces specific anti-inflammatory and pro-remodeling responses not seen in corresponding monocultures.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“with co-culture promoting a more anti-inflammatory and pro-remodeling cytokine response than corresponding monocultures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Interpretationreasoning
Human iPSC microglia models enable study of these gene products at their correct gene dosage, in an authentic human in vitro system.
“Human iPSC microglia models enable study of these gene products at their correct gene dosage, in an authentic human in vitro system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The model recapitulates the ontogenetic development of microglia in vivo.
“We have established a highly efficient in vitro human iPSC-derived microglia-neuron co-culture model, which recapitulates the ontogenetic development of microglia in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Such genes may be features of primitive macrophages rather than being microglia specific.
“This reveals that while key microglia genes are expressed in co-pMG, they are often also expressed in pMacpre, pMac, and pMGL, indicating that such genes may be features of primitive macrophages rather than being microglia specific, and that comparison only with blood monocytes/macrophages does not give a complete interpretation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Using co-culture is relevant to examine direct and paracrine microglia-neuronal interactions.
“This shows the relevance of using co-culture to examine direct and paracrine microglia-neuronal interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
These cells do not express a convincing microglia signature.
“Moreover, these cells do not express a convincing microglia signature (Butovsky et al., 2014, Melief et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
- May combine two claims. 39
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 20
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe six key microglia-specific genes identified by Butovsky et al. (2014), MERTK, GPR34, PROS1, C1QA, GAS6, and P2RY12, were all strongly expressed in co-pMG, whereas bloodMono poorly expressed most of these markers.
“Most notably, the six key microglia-specific genes identified by Butovsky et al. (2014), MERTK, GPR34, PROS1, C1QA, GAS6, and P2RY12, were all strongly expressed in co-pMG, whereas bloodMono poorly expressed most of these markers (highlighted in magenta, Figure 2C)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Butovsky et al., 2014 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPSC macrophages derive from MYB-independent, RUNX1- and PU.1-dependent precursors, characteristic of yolk sac-derived macrophages.
“We have recently directly demonstrated that these derive from MYB-independent, RUNX1- and PU.1-dependent precursors, characteristic of yolk sac-derived macrophages (Buchrieser et al., 2017, Vanhee et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Buchrieser et al., 2017 source
The Results section shows that iPSC-derived monocytes/macrophages develop without MYB but require RUNX1 and SPI1 (PU.1). The Discussion, however, says their derivation from these progenitors is suggested rather than directly established, and notes that other primitive macrophage progenitors cannot be excluded without clonal analysis. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Vanhee et al., 2015 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn humans, yolk sac-derived macrophages appear at E17, enter the brain from E31 onward, and mature together with neurons to fully functional ramified microglia.
“Yolk sac-derived macrophages appear at E17 (Tavian and Peault, 2005), enter the brain from E31 onward (Rezaie et al., 2005, Monier et al., 2007), and mature together with neurons to fully functional ramified microglia (Figure 1A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Tavian and Peault, 2005 source
In “The yolk sac” (page not provided), the paper reports that macrophages have been observed in the human yolk sac. It does not date their appearance to embryonic day 17; it describes blood-island precursors at about day 16 and its own observations beginning at day 19. The brain-entry and microglial-maturation clauses are not attributed to this source in the printed sentence. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Rezaie et al., 2005 source
- cites Monier et al., 2007 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSchwartz et al. (2015) successfully seeded iPSC macrophages into 3D iPSC-neuronal structures for toxicity testing, but did not characterize the resulting cells extensively.
“Schwartz et al. (2015) recently successfully seeded iPSC macrophages into 3D iPSC-neuronal structures for toxicity testing, but did not characterize the resulting cells extensively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Schwartz et al., 2015 source
The Results (page not available) report adding microglia/macrophage precursors to 3D neural constructs for neurotoxicity testing. However, the cells came from the H1 human embryonic stem-cell line, not iPSCs. The Results also describe FACS, phagocytosis, gene-expression, and morphology assessments, so the claim that the cells were not characterized extensively is not established by this copy. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataco-pMG roughly tile within the neuronal culture, making direct contacts with the neurons.
“Co-pMG roughly “tile” within the neuronal culture, making direct contacts with the neurons (Figure 5A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCo-pMG moved constantly, most of them roughly maintaining their territories.
“Co-pMG moved constantly, most of them roughly maintaining their territories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown datapMacpre, pMac, and pMGL also expressed high levels of most of these genes, along with many of those identified by Melief et al. (2012).
“Notably, pMacpre, pMac, and pMGL also expressed high levels of most of these genes, along with many of those identified by Melief et al. (2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Melief et al., 2012 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCD11c was well expressed in monoculture cells, but weakly expressed in co-pMG.
“CD11c (integrin alpha X, part of the inactivated-C3b receptor 4, CR4), was well expressed in monoculture cells, but weakly expressed in co-pMG.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOther key AD-related genes expressed in fetalMG and co-pMG (and bloodMono) included APP, PICALM, and CD33; PD-related genes included PARK15, PINK1, SNCA, and DJ-1; and MND-related genes included C9orf72, TDP43, and SOD1.
“Other key AD-related genes expressed in fetalMG and co-pMG (and bloodMono) included APP, PICALM, and CD33; PD-related genes included PARK15, PINK1, SNCA, and DJ-1; and MND-related genes included C9orf72, TDP43, and SOD1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBlood monocyte-derived macrophages also upregulated several of these genes, but mostly did not reach the same expression level.
“These expression profiles were confirmed by qRT-PCR (Figure 2D), which also showed that co-pMG had comparable levels of expression of these microglial genes with cultured adult human microglia and with directly processed adult human microglia, and that while blood monocyte-derived macrophages also upregulated several of these genes, they mostly did not reach the same expression level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataQuantification of movement of co-pMG, pMGL, and pMac over 5 hr showed co-pMG moved a significantly greater accumulated distance (251 ± 21 μm; mean ± SEM; n = 6) than pMGL (119 ± 6 μm; n = 5) and pMac (53 ± 11 μm; n = 5), which hardly moved at all.
“Quantification of movement of co-pMG, pMGL, and pMac over 5 hr showed co-pMG moved a significantly greater accumulated distance (251 ± 21 μm; mean ± SEM; n = 6) than pMGL (119 ± 6 μm; n = 5) and pMac (53 ± 11 μm; n = 5), which hardly moved at all (Figures 5B–5F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAPOE was among the most strongly differentially expressed genes, being very low in bloodMono and high in all other populations.
“APOE, variants of which are major risk factors for AD, was among the most strongly differentially expressed genes, being very low in bloodMono and high in all other populations (Figure S3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA targeted principal components analysis of these samples revealed a weak neural cell signature in the co-cultured pMG isolated with CD11b beads, but otherwise demonstrated the close similarity of these cells to fetal microglia.
“A targeted principal components analysis of these samples revealed a weak neural cell signature in the co-cultured pMG isolated with CD11b beads, but otherwise demonstrated the close similarity of these cells to fetal microglia (Figures S4A and S4B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMERTK was expressed highly on all PSC-derived macrophage and microglia conditions, while CD33 was detected albeit at low levels.
“The microglia-associated protein MERTK was expressed highly on all PSC-derived macrophage and microglia conditions, while the AD-associated protein CD33 was detected albeit at low levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUpon activation co-culture microglia become more ameboid and release multiple microglia-relevant cytokines.
“Upon activation they become more ameboid, releasing multiple microglia-relevant cytokines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCo-culture could be extended for at least 42 days, during which time neurons maintained spontaneous electrical activity at least as well as neurons cultured alone.
“Co-culture could be extended for at least 42 days, during which time neurons maintained spontaneous electrical activity at least as well as neurons cultured alone (Figure S1E), and calcium flux was observable upon addition of potassium ions (Movie S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAn unconjugated polyclonal antibody to TMEM119 gave modest staining of pMGL but background staining was evident in co-culture cells, and an unconjugated antibody to the purinergic receptor P2YR12 showed strong staining of pMGL although background staining was similarly evident in co-culture.
“An unconjugated polyclonal antibody to TMEM119 gave modest staining of pMGL but background staining was evident in co-culture cells, and an unconjugated antibody to the purinergic receptor P2YR12 showed strong staining of pMGL although background staining was similarly evident in co-culture (Figure S5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFERMT2, TREM2, APOE, and UCHL1 were expressed in fetalMG and co-pMG but not in bloodMono (although TREM2 was upregulated in bloodMono-derived macrophages).
“FERMT2, TREM2, APOE, and UCHL1 were expressed in fetalMG and co-pMG but not in bloodMono (although TREM2 was upregulated in bloodMono-derived macrophages, Figure 2D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe pMacpre yield is consistent with previously reported yields for this protocol, similar to Abud et al. 2017 (typically 40-fold), and 10-fold higher than two other recently published hiPS-microglia protocols.
“The cumulative yield of pMacpre for the lines used in this study was 10- to 43-fold higher than the number of input iPSCs, consistent with yields previously reported for this protocol (van Wilgenburg et al., 2013), similar to a recently published hiPS-microglia protocol (typically 40-fold) (Abud et al., 2017), and 10-fold higher than two other recently published hiPS-microglia protocols (0.5- to 4”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown datapH-sensitive fluorescent zymosan particles added to co-cultures became visible inside co-pMG within 1 hr, comparable with pMac.
“pH-sensitive fluorescent zymosan particles added to co-cultures became visible inside co-pMG, within 1 hr, comparable with pMac (Movie S4), indicating the competent development of mature phagosomes in co-pMG.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThere was broad correspondence across Proteome Profiler and Luminex platforms.
“There was broad correspondence across Proteome Profiler and Luminex platforms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenCo-pMG can be maintained in co-culture, retaining neuronal maturity and functionality for many weeks.
“Co-pMG can be maintained in co-culture, retaining neuronal maturity and functionality for many weeks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIL-34 is an alternative CSF1R ligand supporting microglia survival and differentiation.
“In the brain, interleukin-34 (IL-34) is an alternative CSF1R ligand supporting microglia survival and differentiation (Greter et al., 2012), and microglia adopt an increasingly ramified morphology and continued maturation far beyond birth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Greter et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn mice, two waves of embryonic macrophages are produced in the yolk sac blood islands at embryonic day 7.5 and E8.25, and the first wave migrate into the developing brain and differentiate to microglia.
“In mice, two waves of embryonic macrophages are produced in the yolk sac blood islands at embryonic day 7.5 (E7.5) and E8.25, and the first wave migrate into the developing brain and differentiate to microglia (Ginhoux et al., 2010, Gomez Perdiguero et al., 2015, Hoeffel et al., 2015, Palis et al., 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataTaken together, these results show the transcriptomic similarity of co-pMG with primary microglia, with expression of key microglial markers and genes in relevant homeostatic pathways, and downregulation of antimicrobial pathways in co-pMG.
“Taken together, these results show the transcriptomic similarity of co-pMG with primary microglia, with expression of key microglial markers and genes in relevant homeostatic pathways, and downregulation of antimicrobial pathways in co-pMG.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Human microglial ontogeny processes are analogous to those in mice.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationYolk sac-derived macrophages are Myb independent but dependent on PU.1 and Irf8.
“These yolk sac-derived macrophages are Myb independent but dependent on PU.1 and Irf8 (Kierdorf et al., 2013, Schulz et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMicroglia in the developing brain proliferate locally at a low rate and are not normally replaced by other monocytes and macrophages from outside the brain, unlike most other tissue-resident macrophages.
“Microglia in the developing brain proliferate locally at a low rate and are not normally replaced by other monocytes and macrophages from outside the brain, in contrast to most other tissue-resident macrophages (which also initially originate from yolk sac-derived macrophages, but are partially or fully replaced by fetal liver- or blood monocyte-derived macrophages [Bain et al., 2014, Calderon et”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationpMac are competent at phagocytosing particles, progressive acidification of the maturing phagosome being detectable using particles coupled to pH-sensitive fluorophores.
“We have previously demonstrated that pMac are competent at phagocytosing particles, progressive acidification of the maturing phagosome being detectable using particles coupled to pH-sensitive fluorophores (Kapellos et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kapellos et al., 2016 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataGenes that have been previously identified as being specific to microglia versus blood monocytes are not necessarily exclusive to microglia, but a subset of them are more likely correlates of primitive macrophages, since they are also highly expressed in pMac.
“However, these results also highlight a previously unappreciated detail, which is that genes that have been previously identified as being specific to microglia versus blood monocytes are not necessarily exclusive to microglia, but a subset of them are more likely correlates of primitive macrophages, since they are also highly expressed in pMac.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningMyb independence distinguishes yolk sac-derived macrophages from adult, definitive, blood monocyte-derived macrophages.
“Myb independence, therefore, distinguishes yolk sac-derived macrophages from adult, definitive, blood monocyte-derived macrophages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCo-culture conditions were compatible for co-pMG and had no detrimental effect on the maturity and functionality of the neurons.
“Together, these observations indicate that co-culture conditions were compatible for co-pMG and had no detrimental effect on the maturity and functionality of the neurons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Human microglial ontogeny processes are analogous to those in mice.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataco-pMG and their primitive precursors express expected microglia and myeloid-associated proteins, although PSC macrophages and microglia have not been exposed to the cytokine milieu of the body and thus have low basal levels of proteins such as MHC antigens.
“These results show that co-pMG and their primitive precursors express expected microglia and myeloid-associated proteins, although PSC macrophages and microglia have not been exposed to the cytokine milieu of the body and thus have low basal levels of proteins such as MHC antigens.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese features were a direct result of physical contact with neurons, as cells monocultured on tissue-culture plastic did not display such dynamic microglial characteristics.
“These features were a direct result of physical contact with neurons, as cells monocultured on tissue-culture plastic did not display such dynamic microglial characteristics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataco-pMG display the morphology and dynamic behavior expected of microglia, continually sensing and responding to their neuronal environment.
“Together, these results show that co-pMG display the morphology and dynamic behavior expected of microglia, continually sensing and responding to their neuronal environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFigure 7 used mean ± SD, three genetic backgrounds.
“Mean ± SD, three genetic backgrounds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe Beutner/Almeida method directs EBs through a neuronal differentiation pathway and thus does not replicate yolk sac myelopoiesis.
“However, this method directs the EBs through a neuronal differentiation pathway and thus does not replicate yolk sac myelopoiesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAbud et al. (2017) uses low oxygen concentrations/several replatings/five different cytokine cocktails/FAC sorting progenitors.
“versus sequential trituration/replating steps for Muffat et al. (2016), fluorescence-activated cell (FAC) sorting/plating on astrocytes/second FAC sorting for Pandya et al. (2017), and low oxygen concentrations/several replatings/five different cytokine cocktails/FAC sorting progenitors for Abud et al. (2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Abud et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe protocol produces MYB-independent myeloid cells, recapitulating an embryonic ontogeny.
“Our own work (Buchrieser et al., 2017) and that of others (Hoeffel et al., 2015) indicates that this protocol produces MYB-independent myeloid cells, recapitulating an embryonic ontogeny, and lineage-tracking studies in mouse have demonstrated that microglia derive from primitive, yolk sac macrophages that migrate into the developing brain (Ginhoux et al., 2010, Ginhoux et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Buchrieser et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hoeffel et al., 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFigure 6 quantitative analysis used two videos each of three cultures, i.e., six replicates per condition.
“(C–E) Quantitative analysis (two videos each of three cultures, i.e., six replicates per condition).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPandya et al. (2017) uses FAC sorting/plating on astrocytes/second FAC sorting.
“versus sequential trituration/replating steps for Muffat et al. (2016), fluorescence-activated cell (FAC) sorting/plating on astrocytes/second FAC sorting for Pandya et al. (2017), and low oxygen concentrations/several replatings/five different cytokine cocktails/FAC sorting progenitors for Abud et al. (2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pandya et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBeutner et al. (2013) described a method for deriving microglia from mouse embryonic stem cells.
“Beutner et al. (2013) described a method for deriving microglia from mouse embryonic stem cells, and, using the same methodology, Almeida et al. (2012) derived microglia from human iPSCs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beutner et al., 2013 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSome functions and disease-relevant genes can be studied in monoculture conditions, but others involving crosstalk between microglia and neurons will be better studied using the co-culture model.
“Some of these functions and disease-relevant genes can be studied in the monoculture conditions detailed here, but others, involving crosstalk between microglia and neurons, such as paired receptor engagement, paracrine signaling, damage responses, synaptic surveillance, and pruning, will be better studied using the co-culture model we have described.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe protocol is now widely used by others.
“In 2008, we derived human PSC macrophages using a very simple methodology without OP9 feeders (Karlsson et al., 2008), which we subsequently adapted to a fully defined, robust serum-free protocol (van Wilgenburg et al., 2013), now widely used by others (Aflaki et al., 2014, Alasoo et al., 2015, Gupta et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Aflaki et al., 2014 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites Alasoo et al., 2015 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites Gupta et al., 2016 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPandya et al. (2017) characterized their iPSC microglia in monoculture following isolation from astrocytes.
“Muffat et al. (2016) characterized their iPSC microglia in monoculture, briefly assessing co-culture, and Pandya et al. (2017) characterized their iPSC microglia in monoculture following isolation from astrocytes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pandya et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe authors subsequently adapted the protocol to a fully defined, robust serum-free protocol.
“In 2008, we derived human PSC macrophages using a very simple methodology without OP9 feeders (Karlsson et al., 2008), which we subsequently adapted to a fully defined, robust serum-free protocol (van Wilgenburg et al., 2013), now widely used by others (Aflaki et al., 2014, Alasoo et al., 2015, Gupta et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites van Wilgenburg et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataMorphology scoring was performed blind by three independent assessors.
“Micrographs were scored blind by three independent assessors for number of microglia with activated morphology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll human material was obtained with informed consent and with approval of relevant institutions.
“All human material (iPSCs, adult blood, fetal and adult microglia) was obtained with informed consent and with the approval of the relevant institutions (see Supplemental Information for full details).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMuffat et al. (2016) uses sequential trituration/replating steps.
“versus sequential trituration/replating steps for Muffat et al. (2016), fluorescence-activated cell (FAC) sorting/plating on astrocytes/second FAC sorting for Pandya et al. (2017), and low oxygen concentrations/several replatings/five different cytokine cocktails/FAC sorting progenitors for Abud et al. (2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Muffat et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn 2008, the authors derived human PSC macrophages using a simple methodology without OP9 feeders.
“In 2008, we derived human PSC macrophages using a very simple methodology without OP9 feeders (Karlsson et al., 2008), which we subsequently adapted to a fully defined, robust serum-free protocol (van Wilgenburg et al., 2013), now widely used by others (Aflaki et al., 2014, Alasoo et al., 2015, Gupta et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Karlsson et al., 2008 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAlmeida et al. (2012) derived microglia from human iPSCs using the same methodology.
“Beutner et al. (2013) described a method for deriving microglia from mouse embryonic stem cells, and, using the same methodology, Almeida et al. (2012) derived microglia from human iPSCs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Almeida et al., 2012 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe system is amenable to scaling for the development of drug-screening assays to identify compounds that can improve microglial homeostatic clearance functions and dampen chronically activated microglia.
“The system is also amenable to scaling for the development of drug-screening assays to identify compounds that can improve microglial homeostatic clearance functions and dampen chronically activated microglia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMuffat et al. (2016) characterized their iPSC microglia in monoculture, briefly assessing co-culture.
“Muffat et al. (2016) characterized their iPSC microglia in monoculture, briefly assessing co-culture, and Pandya et al. (2017) characterized their iPSC microglia in monoculture following isolation from astrocytes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Muffat et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe authors extensively characterized iPSC microglia in co-culture with iPSC cortical neurons, where cells have highly ramified, dynamic characteristics, and compared directly to intermediate and parallel monoculture stages of differentiation.
“We have extensively characterized iPSC microglia in co-culture with iPSC cortical neurons, where cells have highly ramified, dynamic characteristics, and compared directly to the intermediate and parallel monoculture stages of differentiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
Human microglial ontogeny processes are analogous to those in mice.
“In humans there are few opportunities to investigate the ontogeny of microglia, but it is assumed that the processes are analogous to those in mice.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Fresh primary human microglia are very limited in availability and cannot be propagated.
“Study of microglia has been largely restricted to non-human models (mostly mouse), since availability of fresh primary human microglia is very limited and they cannot be propagated.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Primary human microglia can only be obtained from fresh brain material.
“Since primary human microglia can only be obtained from fresh brain material, previous efforts have been made by others to develop methods for deriving microglia in vitro.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The blood monocyte pathway poorly recapitulates microglia ontogenesis.
“but it is now known that this pathway poorly recapitulates microglia ontogenesis and that blood is not a limitless source of cells, unlike PSCs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Blood is not a limitless source of cells, unlike PSCs.
“but it is now known that this pathway poorly recapitulates microglia ontogenesis and that blood is not a limitless source of cells, unlike PSCs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
B27 contains cortisone, SOD, and catalase.
“Our microglia medium avoids B27, which contains cortisone, SOD, and catalase (likely to compromise microglia function).”
The paper relies on this without support.
B27 compromises microglia function.
“Our microglia medium avoids B27, which contains cortisone, SOD, and catalase (likely to compromise microglia function).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Astrocyte and microglia iPSC models partially recapitulate the transcriptomes of their in vivo counterparts and may capture authentic neurodegenerative disease phenotypes.
“Astrocyte and microglia iPSC models partially recapitulate the transcriptomes of their in vivo counterparts and may capture authentic neurodegenerative disease phenotypes [345,406,480,481,482,483,484].”
From Revisiting the Pathogenesis of X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy (2025) · cites this paper as [484]
The Results report transcriptomic similarity between iPSC-derived co-culture microglia and primary microglia; the Discussion says their profile resembles fetal microglia and identifies disease-relevant genes. The paper presents the model as useful for studying neurodegenerative disease genes, but it does not establish that it captures disease phenotypes or assess iPSC-derived astrocyte models. Page numbers were not supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThese cells closely resemble human foetal microglia with regards to transcriptional signature and express high levels of microglial genes.
“These cells closely resemble human foetal microglia with regards to transcriptional signature and express high levels of microglial genes29,30.”
From PLCγ2 regulates TREM2 signalling and integrin-mediated adhesion and migration of human iPSC-derived macrophages (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
The differentiated hiPSC-derived microglia exhibit functional and transcriptional profiles consistent with human microglia.
“We used CRISPR editing to generate PLCγ2HET and PLCγ2HOM hiPSC cells, and differentiated them into microglia that exhibit functional and transcriptional profiles consistent with human microglia [21].”
From Heterozygous expression of the Alzheimer’s disease-protective PLCγ2 P522R variant enhances Aβ clearance while preserving synapses (2022) · cites this paper as [21]
Genomic integrity of iPSC lines was verified by Illumina Omniexpress 24 v1.2 SNP microarray analysis.
“An Illumina Omniexpress 24 v1.2 SNP microarray analysis was performed to verify genomic integrity, as previously described in Haenseler et al.29.”
From PLCγ2 regulates TREM2 signalling and integrin-mediated adhesion and migration of human iPSC-derived macrophages (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
The Results section’s Figure 2 caption describes Illumina HT12v4 transcriptome analysis, not an OmniExpress SNP microarray used to verify genomic integrity. Searches for “OmniExpress,” “SNP microarray analysis,” and genomic-integrity testing found no passage in our copy describing the claimed procedure; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredProtocols have been developed to produce human iPSC-derived microglial-like cells (iMG).
“Recently, protocols for induce human iPSC-derived microglial-like cells (iMG) have been developed [67-71].”
From Transcriptional and Epigenetic Regulation of Microglia in Health and Disease (2019) · cites this paper as [70]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Replicate counts disagree for the motility comparison
MinorThe motility results report five replicates for pMGL and pMac, but the Figure 5 caption states that there were six replicates per condition.
“pMGL (119 ± 6 μm; n = 5) and pMac (53 ± 11 μm; n = 5)”
“Macrophages and co-culture microglia were imaged every 5 min for 5 hr (two videos each of three cultures i.e., six replicates per condition).”
Cites
Fate Mapping Analysis Reveals That Adult Microglia Derive from Primitive Macrophages
Ginhoux, F., Greter, M., Leboeuf, M., Nandi, S., See, P., Gokhan, S., Mehler, M. F., Conway, S. J., Ng, L. G., Stanley, E. R., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1194637 · Cited by 5,175 · see citing works
A Lineage of Myeloid Cells Independent of Myb and Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Schulz, C., Perdiguero, E. G., Chorro, L., Szabo-Rogers, H., Cagnard, N., Kierdorf, K., Prinz, M., Wu, B., Jacobsen, S. E. W., Pollard, J. W., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1219179 · Cited by 2,578 · see citing works
Identification of a unique TGF-β–dependent molecular and functional signature in microglia
Butovsky, O., Jedrychowski, M. P., Moore, C. S., Cialic, R., Lanser, A. J., Gabriely, G., Koeglsperger, T., Dake, B., Wu, P. M., Doykan, C. E., et al. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3599 · Cited by 2,543 · see citing works
Self-citationTissue-resident macrophages originate from yolk-sac-derived erythro-myeloid progenitors
Gomez Perdiguero, E., Klapproth, K., Schulz, C., Busch, K., Azzoni, E., Crozet, L., Garner, H., Trouillet, C., de Bruijn, M. F., Geissmann, F., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13989 · Cited by 2,339 · cited 1× · see citing works
“25, and the first wave migrate into the developing brain and differentiate to microglia (Ginhoux et al., 2010; Gomez Perdiguero et al., 2015; Hoeffel et al., 2015; Palis et al., 1999).”
BackgroundZhang, Y., Sloan, S. A., Clarke, L. E., Caneda, C., Plaza, C. A., Blumenthal, P. D., Vogel, H., Steinberg, G. K., Edwards, M. S. B., Li, G., et al. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.013 · Cited by 2,295 · see citing works
New tools for studying microglia in the mouse and human CNS
Bennett, M. L., Bennett, F. C., Liddelow, S. A., Ajami, B., Zamanian, J. L., Fernhoff, N. B., Mulinyawe, S. B., Bohlen, C. J., Adil, A., Tucker, A., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1525528113 · Cited by 1,804 · see citing works
Dendritic cells, monocytes and macrophages: a unified nomenclature based on ontogeny
Guilliams, M., Ginhoux, F., Jakubzick, C., Naik, S. H., Onai, N., Schraml, B. U., Segura, É., Tussiwand, R., & Yona, S. (2014) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3712 · Cited by 1,802 · see citing works
Epelman, S., Lavine, K. J., Beaudin, A. E., Sojka, D. K., Carrero, J. A., Calderon, B., Brija, T., Gautier, E. L., Ivanov, S., Satpathy, A. T., et al. (2014) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.11.019 · Cited by 1,494 · see citing works
Microglia emerge from erythromyeloid precursors via Pu.1- and Irf8-dependent pathways
Kierdorf, K., Erny, D., Goldmann, T., Sander, V., Schulz, C., Perdiguero, E. G., Wieghofer, P., Heinrich, A., Riemke, P., Hölscher, C., et al. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3318 · Cited by 1,457 · see citing works
Bain, C. C., Bravo-Blas, A., Scott, C. L., Gomez Perdiguero, E., Geissmann, F., Henri, S., Malissen, B., Osborne, L. C., Artis, D., & Mowat, A. M. (2014) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.2967 · Cited by 1,178 · see citing works
iPSC-derived human microglia-like cells to study neurological diseases
Abud, E. M., Ramirez, R. N., Martinez, E. S., Healy, L. M., Nguyen, C. H. H., Newman, S. A., Yeromin, A. V., Scarfone, V. M., Marsh, S. E., Fimbres, C., et al. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.042 · Cited by 1,154 · see citing works
Self-citationHoeffel, G., Chen, J., Lavin, Y., Low, D., Almeida, F. F., See, P., Beaudin, A. E., Lum, J., Low, I., Forsberg, E. C., et al. (2015) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2015.03.011 · Cited by 1,135 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Our own work (Buchrieser et al., 2017) and that of others (Hoeffel et al., 2015) indicates that this protocol produces MYB-independent myeloid cells, recapitulating an embryonic ontogeny, and lineage-tracking studies in mouse have demonstrated that microglia derive from primitive, yolk sac…”
BackgroundResultDevelopment of erythroid and myeloid progenitors in the yolk sac and embryo proper of the mouse
Palis, J., Robertson, S. M., Kennedy, M., Wall, C., & Keller, G. M. (1999) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.126.22.5073 · Cited by 1,050 · see citing works
Shi, Y., Kirwan, P., & Livesey, F. J. (2012) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2012.116 · Cited by 972 · see citing works
Origin and differentiation of microglia
Ginhoux, F., Lim, S., Hoeffel, G., Low, D., & Huber, T. (2013) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2013.00045 · Cited by 905 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…2015) indicates that this protocol produces MYB-independent myeloid cells, recapitulating an embryonic ontogeny, and lineage-tracking studies in mouse have demonstrated that microglia derive from primitive, yolk sac macrophages that migrate into the developing brain (Ginhoux et al., 2010, 2013).”
BackgroundTamoutounour, S., Guilliams, M., Montanana Sanchis, F., Liu, H., Terhorst, D., Malosse, C., Pollet, E., Ardouin, L., Luche, H., Sanchez, C., et al. (2013) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.004 · Cited by 783 · see citing works
Efficient derivation of microglia-like cells from human pluripotent stem cells
Muffat, J., Li, Y., Yuan, B., Mitalipova, M., Omer, A., Corcoran, S., Bakiasi, G., Tsai, L.-H., Aubourg, P., Ransohoff, R. M., et al. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4189 · Cited by 651 · see citing works
Greter, M., Lelios, I., Pelczar, P., Hoeffel, G., Price, J., Leboeuf, M., Kündig, T. M., Frei, K., Ginhoux, F., Merad, M., et al. (2012) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2012.11.001 · Cited by 630 · see citing works
<i>C9orf72</i> is required for proper macrophage and microglial function in mice
O’Rourke, J. G., Bogdanik, L., Yáñez, A., Lall, D., Wolf, A. J., Muhammad, A. K. M. G., Ho, R., Carmona, S., Vit, J. P., Zarrow, J., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf1064 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
Differentiation of human and murine induced pluripotent stem cells to microglia-like cells
Pandya, H., Shen, M. J., Ichikawa, D. M., Sedlock, A. B., Choi, Y., Johnson, K. R., Kim, G., Brown, M. A., Elkahloun, A. G., Maric, D., et al. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4534 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Ontogeny of Tissue-Resident Macrophages
Hoeffel, G., & Ginhoux, F. (2015) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2015.00486 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Wilgenburg, B. V., Browne, C., Vowles, J., & Cowley, S. A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071098 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Self-citationHuman pluripotent stem cell-derived neural constructs for predicting neural toxicity
Schwartz, M. P., Hou, Z., Propson, N. E., Zhang, J., Engstrom, C. J., Costa, V. S., Jiang, P., Nguyen, B. K., Bolin, J. M., Daly, W., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1516645112 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
The pancreas anatomy conditions the origin and properties of resident macrophages
Calderon, B., Carrero, J. A., Ferris, S. T., Sojka, D. K., Moore, L., Epelman, S., Murphy, K. M., Yokoyama, W. M., Randolph, G. J., & Unanue, E. R. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20150496 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Entry and distribution of microglial cells in human embryonic and fetal cerebral cortex
Monier, A., Adle-Biassette, H., Delezoide, A.-L., Evrard, P., Gressens, P., & Verney, C. (2007) · Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/nen.0b013e3180517b46 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Microglial genes regulating neuroinflammation in the progression of Alzheimer's disease
Villegas-Llerena, C., Phillips, A., Garcia-Reitboeck, P., Hardy, J., & Pocock, J. M. (2016) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2015.10.004 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Embryonic development of the human hematopoietic system
Tavian, M., & Peault, B. (2005) · The International Journal of Developmental Biology · doi:10.1387/ijdb.041957mt · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Buchrieser, J., James, W., & Moore, M. D. (2017) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.12.020 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Self-citationLRRK2 and neuroinflammation: partners in crime in Parkinson’s disease?
Russo, I., Bubacco, L., & Greggio, E. (2014) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/1742-2094-11-52 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Karlsson, K. R., Cowley, S., Martinez, F. O., Shaw, M., Minger, S. L., & James, W. (2008) · Experimental Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.exphem.2008.04.009 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Self-citationOhgidani, M., Kato, T. A., Setoyama, D., Sagata, N., Hashimoto, R., Shigenobu, K., Yoshida, T., Hayakawa, K., Shimokawa, N., Miura, D., et al. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep04957 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
A novel real time imaging platform to quantify macrophage phagocytosis
Kapellos, T. S., Taylor, L., Lee, H., Cowley, S. A., James, W. S., Iqbal, A. J., & Greaves, D. R. (2016) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2016.07.011 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Self-citationPhenotyping primary human microglia: tight regulation of LPS responsiveness
Melief, J., Koning, N., Schuurman, K. G., Van De Garde, M. D. B., Smolders, J., Hoek, R. M., Van Eijk, M., Hamann, J., & Huitinga, I. (2012) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.22370 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Almeida, S., Zhang, Z., Coppola, G., Mao, W., Futai, K., Karydas, A., Geschwind, M. D., Tartaglia, M. C., Gao, F., Gianni, D., et al. (2012) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2012.09.007 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Macrophage models of Gaucher disease for evaluating disease pathogenesis and candidate drugs
Aflaki, E., Stubblefield, B. K., Maniwang, E., Lopez, G., Moaven, N., Goldin, E., Marugan, J., Patnaik, S., Dutra, A., Southall, N., et al. (2014) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3008659 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Spontaneous Electrical Activity in the Human Fetal CortexIn Vitro
Moore, A. R., Zhou, W., Jakovčevski, I., Zečević, N., & Antic, S. D. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3886-10.2011 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Schilling, T., Nitsch, R., Heinemann, U., Haas, D., & Eder, C. (2001) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01661.x · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Microglia in the cerebral wall of the human telencephalon at second trimester
Rezaie, P., Dean, A., Male, D., & Ulfig, N. (2005) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh194 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Alasoo, K., Martinez, F. O., Hale, C., Gordon, S., Powrie, F., Dougan, G., Mukhopadhyay, S., & Gaffney, D. J. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep12524 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Unique transcriptome signature of mouse microglia
Beutner, C., Linnartz‐Gerlach, B., Schmidt, S. V., Beyer, M., Mallmann, M. R., Staratschek‐Jox, A., Schultze, J. L., & Neumann, H. (2013) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.22524 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
A novel in vitro human microglia model: Characterization of human monocyte-derived microglia
Etemad, S., Zamin, R. M., Ruitenberg, M. J., & Filgueira, L. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.05.025 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
LRRK2 in peripheral and central nervous system innate immunity: its link to Parkinson's disease
Lee, H., James, W., & Cowley, S. A. (2017) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst20160262 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationJiang, Y., Cowley, S. A., Siler, U., Melguizo, D., Tilgner, K., Browne, C., Dewilton, A., Przyborski, S., Saretzki, G., James, W. S., et al. (2012) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.1053 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationIn vitro human embryonic stem cell hematopoiesis mimics MYB-independent yolk sac hematopoiesis
Vanhee, S., De Mulder, K., Van Caeneghem, Y., Verstichel, G., Van Roy, N., Menten, B., Velghe, I., Philippe, J., De Bleser, D., Lambrecht, B. N., et al. (2015) · Haematologica · doi:10.3324/haematol.2014.112144 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Gupta, R. M., Meissner, T. B., Cowan, C. A., & Musunuru, K. (2016) · Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/atvbaha.115.305956 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Glia and zinc in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease: a mechanism for cognitive decline?
Hancock, S. M., Finkelstein, D. I., & Adlard, P. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00137 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Surprises from the sanitary engineers
Ransohoff, R. M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17881 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Microglia Biology: One Century of Evolving Concepts
Prinz, M., Jung, S., & Priller, J. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.053 · Cited by 1,525 · see citing works
Modeling Alzheimer’s disease with iPSC-derived brain cells
Penney, J., Ralvenius, W. T., & Tsai, L.-H. (2020) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-019-0468-3 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
McQuade, A., Coburn, M., Tu, C. H., Hasselmann, J., Davtyan, H., & Blurton-Jones, M. (2018) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-018-0297-x · Cited by 449 · see citing works
The pro-remyelination properties of microglia in the central nervous system
Lloyd, A. F., & Miron, V. E. (2019) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-019-0184-2 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Microglia: Agents of the CNS Pro-Inflammatory Response
Rodríguez-Gómez, J. A., Kavanagh, E., Engskog-Vlachos, P., Engskog, M. K. R., Herrera, A. J., Espinosa-Oliva, A. M., Joseph, B., Hajji, N., Venero, J. L., & Burguillos, M. A. (2020) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9071717 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Centeno, E. G. Z., Cimarosti, H., & Bithell, A. (2018) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-018-0258-4 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Functional Studies of Missense TREM2 Mutations in Human Stem Cell-Derived Microglia
Brownjohn, P. W., Smith, J., Solanki, R., Lohmann, E., Houlden, H., Hardy, J., Dietmann, S., & Livesey, F. J. (2018) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.03.003 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Scheiblich, H., Eikens, F., Wischhof, L., Opitz, S., Jüngling, K., Cserép, C., Schmidt, S. V., Lambertz, J., Bellande, T., Pósfai, B., et al. (2024) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2024.06.029 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Jin, M., Xu, R., Wang, L., Alam, M. M., Ma, Z., Zhu, S., Martini, A. C., Jadali, A., Bernabucci, M., Xie, P., et al. (2022) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2022.06.007 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Xiang, X., Piers, T. M., Wefers, B., Zhu, K., Mallach, A., Brunner, B., Kleinberger, G., Song, W., Colonna, M., Herms, J., et al. (2018) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-018-0280-6 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Microglia and Astrocyte Function and Communication: What Do We Know in Humans?
Garland, E. F., Hartnell, I. J., & Boche, D. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.824888 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Garcia-Reitboeck, P., Phillips, A., Piers, T. M., Villegas-Llerena, C., Butler, M., Mallach, A., Rodrigues, C., Arber, C. E., Heslegrave, A., Zetterberg, H., et al. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.094 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Human iPSC‐derived microglia: A growing toolset to study the brain's innate immune cells
Hasselmann, J., & Blurton‐Jones, M. (2020) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.23781 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Transcriptional and Epigenetic Regulation of Microglia in Health and Disease
Yeh, H., & Ikezu, T. (2019) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2018.11.004 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Piers, T. M., Cosker, K., Mallach, A., Johnson, G. T., Guerreiro, R., Hardy, J., & Pocock, J. M. (2020) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.201902447r · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Human iPSC-derived glia models for the study of neuroinflammation
Stöberl, N., Maguire, E., Salis, E., Shaw, B., & Hall-Roberts, H. (2023) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-023-02919-2 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Pocock, J., Vasilopoulou, F., Svensson, E., & Cosker, K. (2024) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2024.110020 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Alzheimer’s disease-related transcriptional sex differences in myeloid cells
Coales, I., Tsartsalis, S., Fancy, N., Weinert, M., Clode, D., Owen, D., & Matthews, P. M. (2022) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-022-02604-w · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Redefining Microglial Identity in Health and Disease at Single-Cell Resolution
Provenzano, F., Pérez, M. J., & Deleidi, M. (2021) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2020.09.001 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Eitan, C., Siany, A., Barkan, E., Olender, T., van Eijk, K. R., Moisse, M., Farhan, S. M. K., Danino, Y. M., Yanowski, E., Marmor-Kollet, H., et al. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01040-6 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Novel human iPSC models of neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative disease and regenerative medicine
Summers, R. A., Fagiani, F., Rowitch, D. H., Absinta, M., & Reich, D. S. (2024) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2024.08.004 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Obst, J., Hall-Roberts, H. L., Smith, T. B., Kreuzer, M., Magno, L., Di Daniel, E., Davis, J. B., & Mead, E. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-96144-7 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Co-Culture Models: Key Players in In Vitro Neurotoxicity, Neurodegeneration and BBB Modeling Studies
Monteiro, A. R., Barbosa, D. J., Remião, F., & Silva, R. (2024) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines12030626 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Solomon, S., Sampathkumar, N. K., Carre, I., Mondal, M., Chennell, G., Vernon, A. C., Ruepp, M.-D., & Mitchell, J. C. (2022) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-022-04473-1 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Bartalska, K., Hübschmann, V., Korkut-Demirbaş, M., Cubero, R. J. A., Venturino, A., Rössler, K., Czech, T., & Siegert, S. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104580 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Revisiting the Pathogenesis of X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy
Bougnères, P., & Le Stunff, C. (2025) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes16050590 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Microglial states revisited: from homeostasis to disease
Eggen, B. J. L., & Kooistra, S. M. (2026) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-026-01066-w · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Penning, A., Snoeck, S., Ormaechea, O. R., Ayyildiz, D., Polzer, O., Buitrago-Arango, M., Capobianco, R., de Winter, F., Balusu, S., Verhaagen, J., et al. (2026) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-026-02228-8 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Haenseler, W., Sansom, S. N., Buchrieser, J., Newey, S. E., Moore, C. S., Nicholls, F. J., Chintawar, S., Schnell, C., Antel, J. P., Allen, N. D., Cader, M. Z., Wade-Martins, R., James, W. S., & Cowley, S. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
- Warneford Hospital (GB)
- Cardiff University (GB)
- Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Cowley, Sally A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Stem Cell Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1727-1742
- ISSN
- 2213-6711 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5470330
- OpenAlex
- W2623352127
- Cited by
- 593
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 54 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 7
- FWCI
- 19.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Stem Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (WTISSF121302)
- Medical Research Council (MC_EX_MR/N50192X/1, MC_PC_16034, MR/N013255/1)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007e2013)
- Innovative Medicines Initiative (115439)
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (148607)
- Alzheimer’s Research UK
- Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford (LC0910-004)
- Royal Society
- Parkinson's UK (2581970, SC037554)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- microglia, iPSC-derived macrophages, microglial differentiation, neurodegenerative diseases, inflammation, cytokine expression, phagocytosis, anti-inflammatory cytokines, cortical neurons
- MeSH terms
- Cells, Cultured, Humans, Macrophages, Models, Biological, Neurons, Phagocytosis, Down-Regulation, Cytokines, Microglia, Coculture Techniques, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myb, Pluripotent Stem Cells, fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-06.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review