The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital academic entrepreneurship: The potential of digital technologies on academic entrepreneurship
Abstract
Abstract Today's digital technologies, such as social media, business analytics, the Internet of Things, big data, advanced manufacturing, 3D printing, cloud and cyber-solutions and MOOCs, permeate every private and public organization. However, even if this phenomenon has been analyzed for entrepreneurship in general, to the best of our knowledge, the impact of digital technologies on academic entrepreneurship remains not only slightly addressed. With the aim of filling this gap, this paper proposes a novel contribution regarding the emerging concept of Digital Academic Entrepreneurship. Based on a qualitative literature review, an interpretative framework for Digital Academic Entrepreneurship is deductively proposed that is composed of the following components: the rationale for the adoption of digital technologies for academic entrepreneurship (why), the emerging forms of digital academic entrepreneurship (what), the stakeholders involved through the digital technologies to achieve the academic entrepreneurship goal (who), and the processes of academic entrepreneurship supported by digital technologies (how). The discussion section provides a conceptualization of Digital Academic Entrepreneurship. The paper closes with the identification of a research agenda for this promising and under-researched field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2010) · Cited by 24,023
The Theory of Economic Development
Schumpeter, J., & Backhaus, U. (2006) · The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3 · Cited by 22,506
Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/hebz/9780198869443.001.0001 · Cited by 10,965
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4 · Cited by 8,559
The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study
Mollick, E. (2014) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005 · Cited by 4,221
What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution?
Whetten, D. A. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258554 · Cited by 4,129
(2011) · Cited by 3,330
Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World
Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2017/41:1.03 · Cited by 2,967
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0322 · Cited by 2,964
Creating entrepreneurial universities : organizational pathways of transformation
Clark, B. R. (1998) · Cited by 2,867
Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction
Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(85)90021-6 · Cited by 2,791
Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship
Nambisan, S. (2017) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12254 · Cited by 2,771
Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World
Yoo, Y., Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K., & Majchrzak, A. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0771 · Cited by 2,469
Choudary, S. P., Alstyne, M. V., & PARKER, G. G. (2016) · Cited by 1,818
Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems
Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D. W., & Wright, M. (2018) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1266 · Cited by 1,738
University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature
Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., & Jiang, L. (2007) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtm023 · Cited by 1,591
Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university
Etzkowitz, H. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00009-4 · Cited by 1,522
Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0323 · Cited by 1,514
Research Commentary —Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda
Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0318 · Cited by 1,366
The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages
Etzkowitz, H. (1998) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(98)00093-6 · Cited by 1,279
Mishra, P. (2015) · Cited by 1,243
Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Armstrong, J. S. (2002) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.1.138.14274 · Cited by 997
Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda
Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9128-2 · Cited by 960
30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship
Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.005 · Cited by 913
Computing in Everyday Life: A Call for Research on Experiential Computing1
Yoo, Y. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20721425 · Cited by 810
Fischer, E., & Reuber, A. R. (2011) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.09.002 · Cited by 789
From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society
Audretsch, D. B. (2014) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9288-1 · Cited by 783
The Ambivalent Ontology of Digital Artifacts1
Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A., & Marton, A. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.02 · Cited by 780
Design Theory for Dynamic Complexity in Information Infrastructures: The Case of Building Internet
Hanseth, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2009.19 · Cited by 748
Entrepreneurs in high technology: lessons from MIT and beyond
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-2807 · Cited by 738
Academic Entrepreneurship: Time for a Rethink?
Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2015) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12116 · Cited by 704
Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science
Etzkowitz, H. (1984) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/bf01097964 · Cited by 673
Powers, J. B., & McDougall, P. P. (2005) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.008 · Cited by 648
University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter?
Friedman, J., & Silberman, J. (2003) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1023/a:1021674618658 · Cited by 643
The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge‐based regional development
Etzkowitz, H., & Klofsten, M. (2005) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00387.x · Cited by 598
Digital Technologies as External Enablers of New Venture Creation in the IT Hardware Sector
von Briel, F., Davidsson, P., & Recker, J. (2018) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258717732779 · Cited by 589
Laredo, P. (2007) · Higher Education Policy · doi:10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300169 · Cited by 587
Comparing Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe – The Case of Sweden and Ireland
Klofsten, M., & Jones-Evans, D. (2000) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1023/a:1008184601282 · Cited by 568
Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe
Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Mustar, P., & Lockett, A. (2007) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781847205575 · Cited by 503
Digital Technology Entrepreneurship: A Definition and Research Agenda
Giones, F., & Brem, A. (2017) · Technology Innovation Management Review · doi:10.22215/timreview/1076 · Cited by 491
Growing on Steroids: Rapidly Scaling the User Base of Digital Ventures Through Digital Innovaton1
Huang, J., Henfridsson, O., Liu, M. J., & Newell, S. (2017) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2017/41.1.16 · Cited by 478
The elements of platform leadership
Cusumano, M. A., & Gawer, A. (2003) · IEEE Engineering Management Review · doi:10.1109/emr.2003.1201437 · Cited by 435
Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2005) · Essays in Honor of Edwin Mansfield · doi:10.1007/0-387-25022-0_18 · Cited by 435
Shane, S. (2004) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(02)00114-3 · Cited by 417
Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks
Etzkowitz, H. (2002) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.3152/147154302781781056 · Cited by 376
TWO STRATEGIES FOR INDUCTIVE REASONING IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH.
KETOKIVI, M., & MANTERE, S. (2010) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2010.48463336 · Cited by 358
Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., & Fayolle, A. (2016) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9377-4 · Cited by 294
Co-creation and user innovation: The role of online 3D printing platforms
Rayna, T., Striukova, L., & Darlington, J. (2015) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2015.07.002 · Cited by 249
Somsuk, N., & Laosirihongthong, T. (2014) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.007 · Cited by 195
A process model of academic entrepreneurship
Wood, M. S. (2010) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2010.11.004 · Cited by 189
Innovation Lodestar: The entrepreneurial university in a stellar knowledge firmament
Etzkowitz, H. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.026 · Cited by 170
Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: Interdisciplinary Perspectives
(2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/b102106 · Cited by 164
Martin, B. R. (2012) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/bes006 · Cited by 163
Rasmussen, E. (2011) · International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1177/0266242610385395 · Cited by 163
From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures
(2001) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp.2001.14.2.232.1 · Cited by 155
Digital artifacts as quasi‐objects: Qualification, mediation, and materiality
Ekbia, H. R. (2009) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21189 · Cited by 142
Davey, T., Rossano, S., & van der Sijde, P. (2015) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-015-9450-7 · Cited by 124
Teaching entrepreneurship using Massive Open Online Course (MOOC)
Al‐Atabi, M., & DeBoer, J. J. (2014) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2014.01.006 · Cited by 116
User innovation and entrepreneurship in the virtual world: A study of Second Life residents
Chandra, Y., & Leenders, M. A. A. M. (2012) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2012.02.002 · Cited by 116
Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe
(2008) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research · doi:10.1108/13552550810852848 · Cited by 110
The generative potential of emerging technology to support startups and new ecosystems
Cohen, B. D., Amorós, J. E., & Lundy, L. (2017) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2017.06.004 · Cited by 102
Digitization, innovation, and copyright: What is the agenda?
Greenstein, S. M., Lerner, J., & Stern, S. (2013) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127012460940 · Cited by 77
3D printing and the third mission: The university in the materialization of intellectual capital
Birtchnell, T., Boehme, T., & Gorkin, R. A., III (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.014 · Cited by 66
Through entrepreneurs’ eyes: the Fab-spaces constellation
Mortara, L., & Parisot, N. G. (2016) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2016.1198505 · Cited by 65
Acceptance and usage of social media as a platform among student entrepreneurs
Nawi, N. C., Mamun, A. A., Nasir, N. A. M., Shokery, N. M. B. A. H., Raston, N. A., & Fazal, S. A. (2017) · Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development · doi:10.1108/jsbed-09-2016-0136 · Cited by 63
Creating innovative entrepreneurial mindsets as a lever for knowledge-based regional development
Secundo, G., Vecchio, P. D., & Passıante, G. (2015) · International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development · doi:10.1504/ijkbd.2015.074301 · Cited by 50
Self-citationDavey, T., Rossano, S., & van der Sijde, P. (2017) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9547-7 · Cited by 47
Cirulli, F., Elia, G., Lorenzo, G., Margherita, A., & Solazzo, G. (2016) · Knowledge Management & E-Learning An International Journal · doi:10.34105/j.kmel.2016.08.008 · Cited by 34
Determinants of Scientist Entrepreneurship: An Integrative Research Agenda
Audretsch, D. B., & Erdem, D. K. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-387-23622-8_6 · Cited by 28
Using social media for nurturing civic entrepreneurial spirit and motivation among the students
Pavlova, O., Prichislenko, A., Kazin, P., & Hagen, S. (2016) · International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia (EGOSE) · doi:10.1145/3014087.3014092 · Cited by 6
Impact of students’ learning preferences in an entrepreneurialuniversity
Aaijaz, N., Mustapha, N., Nik, Y. A., et al. (2013) · International Business Information Management Association eBooks · Cited by 2
Cited by
Elia, G., Margherita, A., & Passiante, G. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119791 · Cited by 1,044
Digital entrepreneurship: An interdisciplinary structured literature review and research agenda
Zaheer, H., Breyer, Y., & Dumay, J. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119735 · Cited by 391
Healthcare apps’ purchase intention: A consumption values perspective
Chakraborty, D., & Paul, J. (2023) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102481 · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- Rippa, P., & Secundo, G.
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 146
- Pages
- 900-911
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2883196661
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 72
- FWCI
- 31.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.