The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Universal moral grammar: theory, evidence and the future
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
How (and where) does moral judgment work?
Greene, J., & Haidt, J. (2002) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)02011-9 · Cited by 1,945
The neural basis of human moral cognition
Moll, J., Zahn, R., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1768 · Cited by 930
A Dissociation Between Moral Judgments and Justifications
HAUSER, M., CUSHMAN, F., YOUNG, L., KANG‐XING JIN, R., & MIKHAIL, J. (2007) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00297.x · Cited by 666
Self-citation
Cited by
An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance
Kurzban, R., Duckworth, A., Kable, J. W., & Myers, J. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12003196 · Cited by 1,381
Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality
Gray, K., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2012) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2012.651387 · Cited by 1,008
Rai, T. S., & Fiske, A. P. (2011) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0021867 · Cited by 887
Disgust: evolved function and structure
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., Kurzban, R., & DeScioli, P. (2013) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0030778 · Cited by 810
The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment
Young, L., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Saxe, R. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701408104 · Cited by 625
Malle, B. F., Guglielmo, S., & Monroe, A. E. (2014) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2014.877340 · Cited by 632
Young, L., Camprodon, J. A., Hauser, M., Pascual-Leone, A., & Saxe, R. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0914826107 · Cited by 584
Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making
Bartels, D. M. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.001 · Cited by 435
Psychopaths know right from wrong but don’t care
Cima, M., Tonnaer, F., & Hauser, M. D. (2010) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsp051 · Cited by 362
The roots of modern justice: cognitive and neural foundations of social norms and their enforcement
Buckholtz, J. W., & Marois, R. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3087 · Cited by 286
The neural basis of belief encoding and integration in moral judgment
Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.057 · Cited by 277
No Compromise: Political Consequences of Moralized Attitudes
Ryan, T. J. (2017) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12248 · Cited by 273
Universals and variations in moral decisions made in 42 countries by 70,000 participants
Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Shariff, A., Rahwan, I., & Bonnefon, J.-F. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1911517117 · Cited by 261
Innocent intentions: A correlation between forgiveness for accidental harm and neural activity☆
Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2009) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.020 · Cited by 249
An fMRI Investigation of Spontaneous Mental State Inference for Moral Judgment
Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21137 · Cited by 208
Patterns of Moral Judgment Derive From Nonmoral Psychological Representations
Cushman, F., & Young, L. (2011) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01167.x · Cited by 179
A Psychophysiological Investigation of Moral Judgment after Ventromedial Prefrontal Damage
Moretto, G., Làdavas, E., Mattioli, F., & di Pellegrino, G. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21367 · Cited by 182
The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values
Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2014) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2013.865000 · Cited by 170
Artificial Moral Agents: A Survey of the Current Status
Cervantes, J.-A., López, S., Rodríguez, L.-F., Cervantes, S., Cervantes, F., & Ramos, F. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00151-x · Cited by 151
Everything Is Permitted? People Intuitively Judge Immorality as Representative of Atheists
Gervais, W. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092302 · Cited by 151
Van Bavel, J. J., Packer, D. J., Haas, I. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048693 · Cited by 107
Moral judgment modulates neural responses to the perception of other’s pain: an ERP study
Cui, F., Ma, N., & Luo, Y.-J. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep20851 · Cited by 82
Sauer, H. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108529181 · Cited by 72
Product-Service System Design for Sustainability
Vezzoli, C., Kohtala, C., Srinivasan, A., Diehl, J., Fusakul, S. M., Xin, L., & Sateesh, D. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9781351278003 · Cited by 66
Learning a commonsense moral theory
Kleiman-Weiner, M., Saxe, R., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.005 · Cited by 53
Greene, J. D. (2016) · A Companion to Experimental Philosophy · doi:10.1002/9781118661666.ch11 · Cited by 48
Causal Responsibility and Robust Causation
Grinfeld, G., Lagnado, D., Gerstenberg, T., Woodward, J. F., & Usher, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01069 · Cited by 41
The Moral Status and Rights of Artificial Intelligence
(2020) · Ethics of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190905033.003.0018 · Cited by 26
Explainable, Normative, and Justified Agency
Langley, P. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019775 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Mikhail, J.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 143-152
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111087391
- Cited by
- 887
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
