Cited by 198Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The uncertainty of it all

Whalen, Paul J.·2007·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

The amygdala is clearly implicated in the processing of biologically relevant stimuli, particularly those that can lead to a state of fear. A new study by Herry, Bach and colleagues using both mouse and human subjects seemingly throws a wrench in the spokes by demonstrating that the amygdala is sensitive to non-biologically relevant stimuli (i.e. tones) when they occur in an unpredictable fashion. The implications of this finding for understanding the role of the amygdala in vigilance, threat assessment and anxiety are considered here.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.016

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent theories of amygdala function argue that the amygdala subserves an abstract function in detecting uncertainty or ambiguity in the environment and in triggering arousal and vigilance as a consequence.

    “recent theories of amygdala function argue that the amygdala subserves an abstract function in detecting uncertainty (13) or ambiguity (14) in the environment and in triggering arousal and vigilance as a consequence.”

    From Amygdala damage eliminates monetary loss aversion (2010) · cites this paper as [13]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whalen, P. J.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Whalen, Paul J.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
499-500
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039670967
Cited by
198
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH080716)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
amygdala, fear, threat assessment, sustained attention, anxiety, unpredictability, tone stimuli
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Anxiety, Arousal, Humans, Risk Management, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review