Cited by 183Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFace Recognition and PerceptionAction Observation and Synchronization

The role of the amygdala in atypical gaze on emotional faces in autism spectrum disorders

Open access
Kliemann, D., Dziobek, I., Hatri, A., Baudewig, J., Heekeren, H. R.·2012·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Reduced focus toward the eyes is a characteristic of atypical gaze on emotional faces in autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Along with the atypical gaze, aberrant amygdala activity during face processing compared with neurotypically developed (NT) participants has been repeatedly reported in ASD. It remains unclear whether the previously reported dysfunctional amygdalar response patterns in ASD support an active avoidance of direct eye contact or rather a lack of social attention. Using a recently introduced emotion classification task, we investigated eye movements and changes in blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal in the amygdala with a 3T MRI scanner in 16 autistic and 17 control adult human participants. By modulating the initial fixation position on faces, we investigated changes triggered by the eyes compared with the mouth. Between-group interaction effects revealed different patterns of gaze and amygdalar BOLD changes in ASD and NT: Individuals with ASD gazed more often away from than toward the eyes, compared with the NT group, which showed the reversed tendency. An interaction contrast of group and initial fixation position further yielded a significant cluster of amygdala activity. Extracted parameter estimates showed greater response to eyes fixation in ASD, whereas the NT group showed an increase for mouth fixation. The differing patterns of amygdala activity in combination with differing patterns of gaze behavior between groups triggered by direct eye contact and mouth fixation, suggest a dysfunctional profile of the amygdala in ASD involving an interplay of both eye-avoidance processing and reduced orientation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5294-11.2012

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased amygdala activity in ASD in response to attention to eyes and subsequent gaze avoidance have been replicated.

    “These results were replicated by Kliemann et al. (2012), who also report increased amygdala activity in ASD in response to attention to eyes, and, moreover, subsequent gaze avoidance as measured by the frequency of shifting attention away from the eye region.”

    From Atypical attentional networks and the emergence of autism (2013) · cites this paper as Kliemann et al., 2012

  • Patients on the autism spectrum typically fail to solicit and reciprocate eye contact.

    “For example, patients on the autism spectrum typically fail to solicit and reciprocate eye contact [40,43-45].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gloor P (1997) The amygdaloid system. In: The temporal lobe and limbic system (Gloor P, ed), pp 5591-5721. New York: Oxford UP.
  2. McDonald AJ (1992) Cell types and intrinsic connections of the amygdala. In: The amygdala: neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory, and mental dysfunction (Aggleton J, ed), pp 67-96. New York: Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kliemann, D., Dziobek, I., Hatri, A., Baudewig, J., & Heekeren, H. R.
Affiliations
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-07-11
Volume
32
Issue
28
Pages
9469-9476
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2064718313
Cited by
183
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC 302)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01GW0723, EXC 302)
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, amygdala, gaze behavior, emotional face processing, eye contact, social attention, BOLD signal, fixation position, emotion classification
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Analysis of Variance, Autistic Disorder, Emotions, Face, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review