Cited by 101Stress Responses and CortisolNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

A social neuroscience perspective on stress and health.

Open access
Muscatell, Keely A., Eisenberger, Naomi I.·2012·Social and Personality Psychology Compass

Abstract

Psychological stress is a major risk factor for the development and progression of a number of diseases, including cardiovascular disease, cancer, arthritis, and major depression. A growing body of research suggests that long term, stress‐induced activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and the hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal (HPA) axis may lead to increases in inflammation, which is known to play a key role in the pathophysiology of a variety of diseases. Furthermore, the burgeoning fields of social neuroscience and health neuroscience have begun to identify the neurocognitive mechanisms by which stress may lead to these physiological changes. Here we review the literature examining the neurocognitive correlates of stress‐induced SNS, HPA, and inflammatory responses. Specifically, we summarize the results of neuroimaging studies that have examined the neural correlates of stress‐related increases in SNS, HPA, and inflammatory activity. A set of neural systems involved in threat processing, safety processing, and social cognition are suggested as key contributors to stress‐related changes in physiology. We conclude by offering suggestions for future research in the exciting new field of health neuroscience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00467.x

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several other neurocognitive processes, including those implicated in safety processing and social cognition, are also likely involved in anxiety, inflammation, and depression.

    “However, several other neurocognitive processes are also likely involved, including those implicated in safety processing (e.g., 'Am I safe?' or 'Am I secure?') and social cognition”

    From From stress to inflammation and major depressive disorder: A social signal transduction theory of depression. (2014) · cites this paper as Muscatell & Eisenberger, 2012

    The sections on safety-processing and self and social cognitive processing link these neural systems to physiological responses to stress and, potentially, inflammatory responding (page unavailable). They do not establish the claim’s additional link to anxiety and depression. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, along with amygdala and anterior insula, was suggested to constitute a neural alarm system responsible for detection of environmental threats and regulation of responses to danger including sympathetic nervous system and HPA axis response.

    “Along with amygdala and AI, dACC was suggested to constitute a so-called “neural alarm system,” which is responsible for the detection of environmental threats and the regulation of responses to danger including SNS system and HPA axis response (Muscatell and Eisenberger, 2012).”

    From The interplay between stress, inflammation, and emotional attention: relevance for depression (2019) · cites this paper as Muscatell and Eisenberger, 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muscatell, K. A., & Eisenberger, N. I.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12
Volume
6
Issue
12
Pages
890-904
ISSN
1751-9004 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1954191193
Cited by
101
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social and Personality Psychology Compass (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH091352, T32MH015750)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
psychological stress, social neuroscience, sympathetic nervous system, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, inflammation, neurocognitive mechanisms, threat processing, social cognition, cardiovascular disease, depression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review