Cited by 41Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Molecular survey of Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens by new real-time TaqMan® PCR assay in dogs and mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Corsica (France)

Open access
Tahir, Djamel, Bittar, Fadi, Barré-Cardi, Hélène, Sow, Doudou, Dahmani, Mustapha, Mediannikov, Oleg, Raoult, Didier, Davoust, Bernard +1 more·2017·Veterinary Parasitology

Abstract

Dirofilaria immitis and D. repens are filarioid nematodes of animals and humans, transmitted by the bite of infected mosquitoes. Domestic and wild canids are a major natural host and reservoir for these parasites. In this study, we designed a duplex real-time PCR protocol targeting the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene, detecting both D. immitis and D. repens using two primer pairs and two Dirofilaria-specific hydrolysable probes. The sensitivity and specificity of the primers and probes were tested in both experimental and naturally infected samples. The detection limits of this assay were evaluated using plasmid DNA from D. immitis and D. repens. No cross-reaction was observed when testing this system against DNA from other filarial nematodes. The detection limit of the real-time PCR system was one copy per reaction mixture containing 5μl of template DNA. Field application of the new duplex real-time assay was conducted in Corsica. The prevalence rate of D. immitis was 21.3% (20/94) in dogs. In a locality where most dogs with Dirofilaria spp. infection were found, D. immitis and D. repens were detected in 5% (20/389) and 1.5% (6/389) of the Aedes albopictus population, respectively. These results suggest that this sensitive assay is a powerful tool for monitoring dirofilariosis in endemic or high risk areas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.01.002

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tahir, D., Bittar, F., Barré-Cardi, H., Sow, D., Dahmani, M., Mediannikov, O., Raoult, D., Davoust, B., & Parola, P.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Parola, Philippe
Venue
Veterinary Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
235
Pages
1-7
ISSN
0304-4017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2568113261
Cited by
41
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL AMU (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Fondation Méditerranée Infection
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilaria repens, canine dirofilariasis, filarioid nematodes, duplex PCR assay, mitochondrial COI gene, dogs, Aedes albopictus, mosquitoes, molecular detection, prevalence, Corsica
MeSH terms
Aedes, Animals, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Female, France, Insect Vectors, Culicidae, Sensitivity and Specificity, DNA Primers, DNA, Helminth, Dirofilaria repens, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review