Cited by 610Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Common circuit defect of excitatory-inhibitory balance in mouse models of autism

Open access
Gogolla, Nadine, LeBlanc, Jocelyn J., Quast, Kathleen B., Südhof, Thomas C., Fagiolini, Michela, Hensch, Takao K.·2009·Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Abstract

One unifying explanation for the complexity of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) may lie in the disruption of excitatory/inhibitory (E/I) circuit balance during critical periods of development. We examined whether Parvalbumin (PV)-positive inhibitory neurons, which normally drive experience-dependent circuit refinement (Hensch Nat Rev Neurosci 6:877–888, 1), are disrupted across heterogeneous ASD mouse models. We performed a meta-analysis of PV expression in previously published ASD mouse models and analyzed two additional models, reflecting an embryonic chemical insult (prenatal valproate, VPA) or single-gene mutation identified in human patients (Neuroligin-3, NL-3 R451C). PV-cells were reduced in the neocortex across multiple ASD mouse models. In striking contrast to controls, both VPA and NL-3 mouse models exhibited an asymmetric PV-cell reduction across hemispheres in parietal and occipital cortices (but not the underlying area CA1). ASD mouse models may share a PV-circuit disruption, providing new insight into circuit development and potential prevention by treatment of autism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11689-009-9023-x

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gogolla, N., LeBlanc, J. J., Quast, K. B., Südhof, T. C., Fagiolini, M., & Hensch, T. K.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Fagiolini, Michela
  • Hensch, Takao K.
Venue
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Published
2009-06
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
172-181
ISSN
  • 1866-1947 (ISSN-L)
  • 1866-1955
OpenAlex
W2158463114
Cited by
610
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 31
FWCI
10.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Simons Foundation
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS062277)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, excitation-inhibition balance, parvalbumin interneurons, neocortex, neuroligin-3, hemispheric lateralization, circuit development, mouse models of autism, critical period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review