Cited by 1,076SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesRespiratory viral infections research

Lung pathology of fatal severe acute respiratory syndrome

Open access
Nicholls, John M, Poon, Leo LM, Lee, Kam C, Ng, Wai F, Lai, Sik T, Leung, Chung Y, Chu, Chung M, Hui, Pak K +8 more·2003·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a novel infectious disease with global impact. A virus from the family Coronaviridae has been identified as the cause, but the pathogenesis is still unclear. Methods Post-mortem tissue samples from six patients who died from SARS in February and March, 2003, and an open lung biopsy from one of these patients were studied by histology and virology. Only one full autopsy was done. Evidence of infection with the SARS-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and human metapneumovirus was sought by reverse-transcriptase PCR and serology. Pathological samples were examined by light and electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry. Findings All six patients had serological evidence of recent infection with SARS-CoV. Diffuse alveolar damage was common but not universal. Morphological changes identified were bronchial epithelial denudation, loss of cilia, and squamous metaplasia. Secondary bacterial pneumonia was present in one case. A giant-cell infiltrate was seen in four patients, with a pronounced increase in macrophages in the alveoli and the interstitium of the lung. Haemophagocytosis was present in two patients. The alveolar pneumocytes also showed cytomegaly with granular amphophilic cytoplasm. The patient for whom full autopsy was done had atrophy of the white pulp of the spleen. Electron microscopy revealed viral particles in the cytoplasm of epithelial cells corresponding to coronavirus. Interpretation SARS is associated with epithelial-cell proliferation and an increase in macrophages in the lung. The presence of haemophagocytosis supports the contention that cytokine dysregulation may account, at least partly, for the severity of the clinical disease. The case definition of SARS should acknowledge the range of lung pathology associated with this disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13413-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cytokine storm induced by excessive T-cell responses has been shown to accentuate the pathogenesis of COVID-19.

    “The “cytokine storm” induced by excessive T-cell responses have been actually shown to accentuate the pathogenesis of COVID19 (18, 19).”

    From Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2 (2020) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) suggests that cytokines released by stimulated macrophages contribute to the pathogenesis of SARS. It does not show that excessive T-cell responses induce a cytokine storm or that this mechanism accentuates COVID-19 pathogenesis; it also presents the SARS mechanism as a suggestion rather than an established finding. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. [2]Tsang KW, Ho PL, Ooi GC, et al. A cluster of cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N Engl J Med (in press). 12671062
  2. [3]Peiris JSM Lai ST Poon LLM Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is associated with a coronavirus Lances 361 2003 1319 1325 PMC7112372 12711465
  3. [4]Ksiazek TG, Erdman D, Goldsmith C, et-al. A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med (in press). 12690092
  4. [5]Poutanen SM, Low DE, Henry B, et-al. Identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Canada. N Engl J Med (in press). 12671061
  5. [6]WHO Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) Wkly Epidemiol Rec 78 2003 81 83 12701272
  6. [7]Fouchier RA Bestebroer TM Herfst S Van Der Kemp L Rimmelzwaan GF Osterhaus AD Detection of influenza A virus from different species by PCR amplification of conserved sequences in the matrix gene J Clin Microbiol 38 2000 4096 4101 11060074 PMC87547
  7. [8]Mitchell S O'Neill HJ Ong GM Clinical assessment of a generic DNA amplification assay for the identification of respiratory adenovirus infections J Clin Virol 26 2003 331 338 12637082
  8. [9]Myers JC Colby TV Yousem SA Common pathways and patterns of injury Dail DH Hammar SP Pulmonary pathology 2nd edn. 1994 Springer-Verlag New York 57 77
  9. [10]Bellingan GJ The pulmonary physician in critical care: 6, the pathogenesis of ALI/ARDS Thorax 57 2002 540 546 12037231 PMC1746355
  10. [11]Kim EA Lee KS Primack SL Viral pneumonias in adults: radiologic and pathologic findings Radiographics 22 2002 S137 S149 12376607
  11. [12]Lee N, Hui D, Wu A, et al. A major outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N Engl J Med (in press). 12682352
  12. [14]Corse E Machamer CE The cytoplasmic tail of infectious bronchitis virus E protein directs Golgi targeting J Viral 76 2002 1273 1284 PMC135861 11773403
  13. [15]Garantziotis S Howell DN McAdams HP Davis RD Henshaw NG Palmer SM Influenza pneumonia in lung transplant recipients: clinical features and association with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome Chest 119 2001 1277 1280 11296201
  14. [16]Halbur PG Paul PS Frey ML Comparison of the pathogenicity of two US porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates with that of the Lelystad virus Vet Pathol 32 1995 648 660 8592800
  15. [17]Halbur PG Paul PS Vaughn EM Andrews JJ Experimental reproduction of pneumonia in gnotobiotic pigs with porcine respiratory coronavirus isolate AR310 J Vet Diagn Invest 5 1993 184 188 8389599
  16. [18]Pensaert MB Transmissible gastroentertitis virus (respiritory variant) Pensaert MB Virus infection of porcines 1989 Elsevier Science Publishers Amsterdam 154 165
  17. [19]To KF Chan PK Chan KF Pathology of fatal human infection associated with avian influenza A H5N1 virus J Med Virol 63 2001 242 246 11170064
  18. [20]Fisman DN Hemophagocytic syndromes and infection Emerg Infect Dis 6 2000 60 68 11076718 PMC2640913
  19. [21]Yuen KY Chan PKS Peiris M Clinical features and rapid viral diagnosis of human disease associated with avian influenza A H5N1 virus Lancer 351 1998 467 471 9482437
  20. [22]Cheung CY Poon LLM Lau ASY Induction of proinflammatory cytokines in human macrophages by influenza A (H5N1) viruses: a mechanism for the unusual severity of human disease Lancet 360 2002 1831 1837 12480361
  21. [23]Collins AR Human macrophages are susceptible to coronavirus OC43 Adv Exp Med Biol 440 1998 635 639 9782339
  22. [24]Lai KN Leung JC Metz CN Lai FM Bucala R Lan HY Role for macrophage migration inhibitory factor in acute respiratory distress syndrome J Pathol 199 2003 496 508 12635141
  23. [25]Halbur PG Pallarés FJ Opriessnig T Vaughn EM Paul PS Pathogenicity of three isolates of porcine respiratory coronavirus in the USA Vet Rec 152 2003 358 361 12678259

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nicholls, J. M., Poon, L. L., Lee, K. C., Ng, W. F., Lai, S. T., Leung, C. Y., Chu, C. M., Hui, P. K., Mak, K. L., Lim, W., Yan, K. W., Chan, K. H., Tsang, N. C., Guan, Y., Yuen, K. Y., & Malik Peiris, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Yan Chai Hospital (HK)
  • United Christian Hospital (CN)
  • Kwong Wah Hospital (CN)
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital (CN)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-05
Volume
361
Issue
9371
Pages
1773-1778
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W1971054351
Cited by
1,076
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 139 · 2020: 280 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
56.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • University of Hong Kong
  • U.S. Public Health Service (A195357)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
Keywords
SARS, SARS-associated coronavirus, lung pathology, diffuse alveolar damage, hemophagocytosis, alveolar macrophages, squamous metaplasia, human metapneumovirus, cytokine imbalance
MeSH terms
Adult, Biopsy, Bronchi, Cell Nucleus, Female, Humans, Lung, Male, Metaplasia, Middle Aged, Organ Size, Giant Cells, Fatal Outcome, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review