Cited by 16,378COVID-19 and Mental HealthCOVID-19 Prevention and ImpactCommunication and COVID-19 Impact

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence

Open access

Abstract

The December, 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak has seen many countries ask people who have potentially come into contact with the infection to isolate themselves at home or in a dedicated quarantine facility. Decisions on how to apply quarantine should be based on the best available evidence. We did a Review of the psychological impact of quarantine using three electronic databases. Of 3166 papers found, 24 are included in this Review. Most reviewed studies reported negative psychological effects including post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger. Stressors included longer quarantine duration, infection fears, frustration, boredom, inadequate supplies, inadequate information, financial loss, and stigma. Some researchers have suggested long-lasting effects. In situations where quarantine is deemed necessary, officials should quarantine individuals for no longer than required, provide clear rationale for quarantine and information about protocols, and ensure sufficient supplies are provided. Appeals to altruism by reminding the public about the benefits of quarantine to wider society can be favourable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30460-8

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 1,207

Metadata

Authors
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Brooks, Samantha K
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
395
Issue
10227
Pages
912-920
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W3006659024
Cited by
16,378
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 263 · 2025: 617 · 2024: 1253 · 2023: 2351 · 2022: 3785 · 2021: 4886 · 2020: 3191
FWCI
277.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • reponame:Expeditio Repositorio Institucional UJTL
Funders
  • University of East Anglia
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • Newcastle University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
Keywords
quarantine, psychological impact, COVID-19 pandemic, post-traumatic stress, isolation, fear of infection, stigma, quarantine duration, boredom, financial losses, altruism, public health communication
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Financing, Personal, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Public Health, Quarantine, Social Conditions, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Coronavirus Infections, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review