Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 487

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The sound of silence in prisoner's dilemma and dictator games

Bohnet, Iris, Frey, Bruno S·1999·Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
DOI 10.1016/s0167-2681(98)00121-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0167-2681(98)00121-8

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Andreoni, J., 1995. Cooperation in public-goods experiments: kindness or confusion? American Economic Review, September, 85(4), 891–904
  2. Bolton, 1991, A comparative model of bargaining: Theory and evidence, American Economic Review, 81, 1096
  3. Bolton, 1995, An experimental test for gender differences in beneficent behavior, Economic Letters, 48, 287, 10.1016/0165-1765(94)00621-8 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bolton, 1995, Anonymity versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining, Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 95, 10.1006/game.1995.1026 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Brams, S.J., Taylor, A.D., 1996. Fair Division. From Cake-cutting to Dispute Resolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge · DOI · Paper page
  6. Camerer, 1995, Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 209, 10.1257/jep.9.2.209 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Davis, D.D., Holt, C.A., 1993. Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
  8. Dawes, 1977, Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 1, 10.1037/0022-3514.35.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Eckel, C.C., Grossman, P.J., 1996b. The relative price of fairness: Gender differences in a punishment game, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 30, 143–158 · DOI
  10. Farrell, 1996, Cheap Talk, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 103, 10.1257/jep.10.3.103 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Fehr, 1993, Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investigation, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 437, 10.2307/2118338 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Forsythe, 1991, An experimental analysis of bargaining and strikes with one-sided private information, American Economic Review, 81, 253
  13. Forsythe, 1994, Fairness in simple bargaining experiments, Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 347, 10.1006/game.1994.1021 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Frey, 1995, Institutions affect fairness. Experimental investigations, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 151, 286
  15. Güth, W., 1994. Distributive justice. A behavioral theory and empirical evidence, In: Brandstätter, Hermann Güth, W., (Eds.), Essays on Economic Psychology, Springer, Berlin 153–176 · DOI
  16. Harrison, 1992, Theory and misbehavior of first price auctions: Reply, American Economic Review, 82, 1426
  17. Hey, J.D., 1991. Experiments in Economics, Blackwell, Oxford
  18. Hoffman, 1985, Entitlements, rights and fairness: An experimental examination of subjects' concepts of distributive justice, Journal of Legal Studies, 14, 259, 10.1086/467773 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hoffman, 1996, Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games, American Economic Review, 86, 653
  20. Isaac, 1991, Institutional framing and perceptions of fairness, Constitutional Political Economy, 3, 329, 10.1007/BF02393135 · DOI
  21. Jenni, 1997, Explaining the Identifiable Victim Effect, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 235, 10.1023/A:1007740225484 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Kahneman, 1986, Fairness and the assumption of economics, Journal of Business, 59, 285, 10.1086/296367 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Laury, 1995, Anonymity and the voluntary provision of public goods, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27, 365, 10.1016/0167-2681(94)00073-N · DOI
  24. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J., 1994. Rules, Games, and Common-pool Resources, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor · DOI · Paper page
  25. Rabin, 1993, Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics, American Economic Review, 83, 1281
  26. Roth, A.E., 1995. Bargaining experiments, In: Kagel, J.H., Roth, A.E., (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 253–348 · DOI
  27. Roth, 1982, The role of information in bargaining: An experimental study, Econometrica, 50, 1123, 10.2307/1911866 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Sally, 1995, Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas, Rationality and Society, 7, 58, 10.1177/1043463195007001004 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Schelling, T.C., 1960. The Strategy of Conflict, Oxford University Press, Oxford
  30. Schelling, T.C., 1968. The life you save may be your own, In: Chase, S., (Ed.), Problems in Public Expenditure Analysis, Washington, pp. 127–162
  31. Schotter, 1996, Fairness and survival in ultimatum and dictatorship games, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 31, 37, 10.1016/S0167-2681(96)00863-3 · DOI
  32. Sell, 1991, Levels of information and contributions to public goods, Social Forces, 70, 107, 10.1093/sf/70.1.107 · DOI
  33. Weinstein, 1983, Psychological considerations in valuing health risk reductions, Natural Resources Journal, 23, 659
  34. Young, H.P., 1994. Equity – In Theory and Practice, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bohnet, I., & Frey, B. S.
Venue
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
43-57
ISSN
0167-2681 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0167-2681(98)00121-8
OpenAlex
W2025652312
Cited by
487
References
4
FWCI
38.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.