Cited by 126Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Nicotinic modulation of synaptic transmission and plasticity in cortico-limbic circuits

Open access
Mansvelder, Huibert D., Mertz, Marjolijn, Role, Lorna W.·2009·Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology

Abstract

Nicotine is the principle addictive agent delivered via cigarette smoking. The addictive activity of nicotine is due to potent interactions with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) on neurons in the reinforcement and reward circuits of the brain. Beyond its addictive actions, nicotine is thought to have positive effects on performance in working memory and short-term attention-related tasks. The brain areas involved in such behaviors are part of an extensive cortico-limbic network that includes relays between prefrontal cortex (PFC) and cingulate cortex (CC), hippocampus, amygdala, ventral tegmental area (VTA) and the nucleus accumbens (nAcc). Nicotine activates a broad array of nAChRs subtypes that can be targeted to pre- as well as peri- and post-synaptic locations in these areas. Thereby, nicotine not only excites different types of neurons, but it also perturbs baseline neuronal communication, alters synaptic properties and modulates synaptic plasticity. In this review we focus on recent findings on nicotinic modulation of cortical circuits and their targets fields, which show that acute and transient activation of nicotinic receptors in cortico-limbic circuits triggers a series of events that affects cognitive performance in a long lasting manner. Understanding how nicotine induces long-term changes in synapses and alters plasticity in the cortico-limbic circuits is essential to determining how these areas interact in decoding fundamental aspects of cognition and reward.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.01.007

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ACh release in the amygdala strengthens associations between environmental stimuli and stressful events, potentially contributing to maladaptive learning underlying affective disorders.

    “Thus, ACh release in the amygdala is thought to strengthen associations between environmental stimuli and stressful events, potentially contributing to maladaptive learning underlying affective disorders (Mansvelder et al., 2009).”
  • Cortico-amygdala glutamatergic connections are strongly and persistently potentiated by nAChR stimulation.

    “and cortico-amygdala glutamatergic connections are also strongly and persistently potentiated by nAChR stimulation (Mansvelder et al., 2009).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 135 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mansvelder, H. D., Mertz, M., & Role, L. W.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Role, Lorna W.
Venue
Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
432-440
ISSN
1084-9521 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101759298
Cited by
126
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 19
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS022061)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
nicotine, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, corticolimbic circuits, synaptic plasticity, synaptic transmission, prefrontal cortex, cingulate cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens, nicotine dependence, working memory, attention, reward systems, cognitive performance
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Nicotine, Tobacco Use Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review