Cited by 140Epigenetics and DNA MethylationChild Abuse and TraumaStress Responses and Cortisol

Childhood adversity and DNA methylation of genes involved in the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis and immune system: whole-genome and candidate-gene associations

Open access
Bick, Johanna, Naumova, Oksana, Hunter, Scott, Barbot, Baptiste, Lee, Maria, Luthar, Suniya S., Raefski, Adam, Grigorenko, Elena L.·2012·Development and Psychopathology

Abstract

In recent years, translational research involving humans and animals has uncovered biological and physiological pathways that explain associations between early adverse circumstances and long-term mental and physical health outcomes. In this article, we summarize the human and animal literature demonstrating that epigenetic alterations in key biological systems, the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis and immune system, may underlie such disparities. We review evidence suggesting that changes in DNA methylation profiles of the genome may be responsible for the alterations in hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis and immune system trajectories. Using some preliminary data, we demonstrate how explorations of genome-wide and candidate-gene DNA methylation profiles may inform hypotheses and guide future research efforts in these areas. We conclude our article by discussing the many important future directions, merging perspectives from developmental psychology, molecular genetics, neuroendocrinology, and immunology, that are essential for furthering our understanding of how early adverse circumstances may shape developmental trajectories, particularly in the areas of stress reactivity and physical or mental health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579412000806

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children with foster care experience show significant differences in methylation in 72 of 173 investigated genes responsible for HPA and immune system regulation compared with children without foster care experience.

    “Bick et al. (409) reported significant differences in methylation in 72 of investigated 173 genes (responsible for HPA and immune system regulation) in children with and without foster care experience.”

    From Developmental Trajectories of Early Life Stress and Trauma: A Narrative Review on Neurobiological Aspects Beyond Stress System Dysregulation (2019) · cites this paper as [409]

    In ‘Early adversity and whole-genome DNA methylation profiles’ (page not provided), the paper reports differences in 173 genes: 72 had higher methylation and 101 had lower methylation in participants with foster-care histories. The claim omits the 101 genes, describes all 173 as regulating the HPA axis and immune system although the paper identifies only some as immune-related, and calls the participants children although they were aged 20–28 when methylation was measured. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bick, J., Naumova, O., Hunter, S., Barbot, B., Lee, M., Luthar, S. S., Raefski, A., & Grigorenko, E. L.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
Corresponding author
Grigorenko, Elena L.
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
2012-10-15
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
1417-1425
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W2132635226
Cited by
140
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (NIHT32 MH18268, T32MH018268)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA010726, DA010726, DA11498, R01DA011498, DA14385, R01DA014385)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P50HD052120)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
childhood adversity, DNA methylation, epigenetics, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, immune system, stress reactivity, health disparities, candidate gene association, developmental trajectories, mental health, physical health
MeSH terms
Animals, Child, Child Abuse, Humans, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Stress, Psychological, DNA Methylation, Epigenesis, Genetic, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genetic Association Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review