Cited by 291Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFluorine in Organic Chemistry

Identification of novel polyfluorinated ether sulfonates as PFOS alternatives in municipal sewage sludge in China

Open access
Ruan, Ting, Lin, Yongfeng, Wang, Thanh, Liu, Runzeng, Jiang, Guibin·2015·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

A 6:2 chlorinated polyfluorinated ether sulfonate (6:2 Cl-PFAES) with the trade name F-53B, is an alternative to perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) in electroplating industry that is uniquely used in China. It was developed as a mist suppressant initially in the 1970s, but the environmental behaviors and potential adverse effects of the 6:2 Cl-PFAES have only recently been investigated. In this work, the occurrence and distribution of perfluoroalkyl sulfonate (PFSA), fluorotelomer sulfonate (FTSA), and PFAES analogues were investigated in municipal sewage sludge samples collected around China. Perfluorobutane, perfluorohexane, perfluorooctane, and perfluorodecanesulfonates, 6:2 and 8:2 FTSAs, and the emerging 6:2 Cl-PFAES were detected. Moreover, 8:2 and 10:2 Cl-PFAESs were identified for the first time as new polyfluorinated contaminants using high resolution mass spectrometry. These fluorinated analytes were further quantified with the aid of commercial and laboratory-purified standards. PFOS was the predominant contaminant with a geometric mean (GM) value of 3.19 ng/g dry weight (d.w.), which was subsequently followed by 6:2 Cl-PFAES and 8:2 Cl-PFAES (GM: 2.15 and 0.50 ng/g d.w., respectively). Both 6:2 and 8:2 Cl-PFAES were positively detected as the major components in the F-53B commercial product, and discrete 6:2 Cl-PFAES/8:2 Cl-PFAES ratios in the product and sludge samples might suggest 8:2 Cl-PFAES had enhanced sorption behavior in the sludge due to the increase in hydrophobicity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.5b01010

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruan, T., Lin, Y., Wang, T., Liu, R., & Jiang, G.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Örebro University (SE)
Corresponding author
Jiang, Guibin
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2015-05-21
Volume
49
Issue
11
Pages
6519-6527
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W261228946
Cited by
291
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 3
FWCI
15.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences OpenIR (Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2015CB453102)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21207140, 21361140359)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB14010400)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
Keywords
PFOS alternatives, F-53B, fluorotelomer sulfonates, PFOS, sewage sludge, electroplating industry, sorption behavior, hydrophobicity
MeSH terms
China, Cities, Environment, Ether, Fluorocarbons, Sewage, Time Factors, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review