Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 852

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 223 of the 223 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ionic Liquids-Based Extraction: A Promising Strategy for the Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycle

Sun, Xiaoqi, Luo, Huimin, Dai, Sheng·2012·Chemical Reviews
DOI 10.1021/cr200193x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVReviewNEXTIonic Liquids-Based Extraction: A Promising Strategy for the Advanced Nuclear Fuel CycleXiaoqi Sun†∥, Huimin Luo‡, and Sheng Dai*†§View Author Information† Chemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States ‡ Energy and Transportation Science Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States § Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37916, United States ∥ State Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Resource Utilization, Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, P. R. China*Phone: +1 (865) 576 5235. Tel: +1 (865) 576 7307. E-mail: [email protected]Cite this: Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 4, 2100–2128Publication Date (Web):December 5, 2011Publication History Received1 June 2011Published online5 December 2011Published inissue 11 April 2012https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr200193xhttps://doi.org/10.1021/cr200193xreview-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2011 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views9919Altmetric-Citations753LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Anions,Cations,Extraction,Salts,Solvents Get e-Alerts

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cr200193x

Cites

223 of 223 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 852

Metadata

Authors
Sun, X., Luo, H., & Dai, S.
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2011-12-05
Volume
112
Issue
4
Pages
2100-2128
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
DOI
10.1021/cr200193x
OpenAlex
W2060433373
Cited by
852
References
223
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.