CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 222Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Relation Between Sluggish Cognitive Tempo and DSM-IV ADHD

Hartman, Christie A., Willcutt, Erik G., Rhee, Soo Hyun, Pennington, Bruce F.·2004·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
DOI 10.1023/b:jacp.0000037779.85211.29
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

To test the relation between sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) and DSM-IV ADHD symptoms, parent and teacher ratings of the 18 DSM-IV ADHD items and five potential SCT items were obtained in a community sample of 8-18 year-old twins that was overselected for ADHD and learning disabilities (n = 296). Confirmatory factor analyses revealed that a three-factor model provided the best fit to the data for both parent and teacher ratings. DSM-IV inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms loaded on two factors consistent with the DSM-IV model, and five SCT symptoms loaded primarily on a third factor. The SCT and inattention factors were highly correlated, whereas SCT and hyperactivity-impulsivity were weakly related. Both raters indicated that children meeting symptom criteria for the combined and inattentive subtypes exhibited significantly more SCT symptoms than those meeting symptom criteria for hyperactive-impulsive type and the comparison group without ADHD. Children meeting symptom criteria for the inattentive type exhibited significantly more SCT symptoms than those meeting criteria for the combined type, based on teacher ratings. These results suggest that SCT is an internally consistent construct that is significantly associated with DSM-IV inattention.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:jacp.0000037779.85211.29

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Achenbach, T. (1991a). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
  2. DeFries, J. C. (1985). Colorado Reading Project. In D. Gray & J. Kavanaugh (Eds.), Biobehavioral measures of dyslexia (pp. 107–122). Parkton, MD: York Press.
  3. Dunn, L. M., & Markwardt, F. C. (1970). Examiner's manual: Peabody Individual Achievement Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  4. DuPaul, G. J., Power, T. P., & Anastopoulos, A. D. (1998). ADHD Rating Scale-IV. New York: Guilford.
  5. Kovacs, M. (1988). The Children's Depression Inventory manual. New York: Multi-Health Systems.
  6. Lahey, B. B., & Willcutt, E. (2002). The validity of attentiondeficit/ hyperactivity disorder among children and adolescents. In P. S. Jensen & J. R. Cooper (Eds.), Diagnosis and treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: An evidence-based approach.New York: Civic Research Institute, pp. 1–23.
  7. Reich, W., & Welner, Z. (1988). Revised version of the Diagnostic Interview for children and adolescents (DICA-R). St. Louis, MO: Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry.
  8. Wechsler, D. (1974). Examiner's manual: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children-revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Hartman, C. A., Willcutt, E. G., Rhee, S. H., & Pennington, B. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • University of Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Hartman, Christie A.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2004-10
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
491-503
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
DOI
10.1023/b:jacp.0000037779.85211.29
OpenAlex
W2159634493
Cited by
222
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T31 MH 16880, MH 04024, R01MH063941, R01MH062120, F32MH012100, MH 38820)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K01DA013956)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 27802, P50HD027802)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
sluggish cognitive tempo, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, ADHD subtypes, factor structure, parent and teacher ratings, children and adolescents, learning disabilities, twins
MeSH terms
Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cognition Disorders, Diseases in Twins, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review