The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me.
Abstract
College students, especially women, demonstrated negativity toward math and science relative to arts and language on implicit measures. Group membership (being female), group identity (self = female), and gender stereotypes (math = male) were related to attitudes and identification with mathematics. Stronger implicit math = male stereotypes corresponded with more negative implicit and explicit math attitudes for women but more positive attitudes for men. Associating the self with female and math with male made it difficult for women, even women who had selected math-intensive majors, to associate math with the self. These results point to the opportunities and constraints on personal preferences that derive from membership in social groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of psychological androgyny
Bem, S. L. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036215 · Cited by 8,522
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
Self-citationFazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013 · Cited by 1,793 · cited 1×
“Early formulations of the relationship between implicit and explicit social cognition focused on the independence of implicit and explicit preferences, noting the dissociations between the two (Bosson, Swann, & Pennebaker, 2000; Fazio, Jackson, Dunton, & Williams, 1995; Fazio, Sanbonmatsu, Powell, & Kardes, 1986; Gree…”
BackgroundUsing the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept
Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1022 · Cited by 1,393 · cited 1×
“Yet there is growing evidence to suggest that explicit and implicit measures can be positively and significantly correlated while remaining separate factors (Cunningham et al., 2001; Greenwald & Farnham, 2000 ).”
BackgroundSelf-citationImplicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity
Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2001) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00328 · Cited by 968
Self-citation
Cited by
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.
Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 · Cited by 5,815
Self-citationUnderstanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.
Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015575 · Cited by 3,257
Self-citationScience faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1211286109 · Cited by 3,150
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J., & Narayanan, A. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal4230 · Cited by 2,887
(2003) · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225 · Cited by 1,829
Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations
Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243204265269 · Cited by 1,823
Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167205275613 · Cited by 1,642
An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance
Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. (2008) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.115.2.336 · Cited by 1,576
Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science
Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016239 · Cited by 1,372
Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site.
Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002) · Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.101 · Cited by 1,321
Self-citationInvestigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project
Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Brooks, B., Brumbaugh, C. C., et al. (2014) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000178 · Cited by 1,208
Self-citationCer, D., Yang, Y., Kong, S.-Y., Hua, N., Limtiaco, N., John, R. S., Constant, N., Guajardo-Cespedes, M., Yuan, S., Tar, C., et al. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.11175 · Cited by 1,267
Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000052 · Cited by 1,259
Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021385 · Cited by 1,050
Indulging Our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries
Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/595942 · Cited by 996
New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis.
Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0021276 · Cited by 920
Mind matters: cognitive and physical effects of aging self-stereotypes
Levy, B. R. (2003) · The Journals of Gerontology: Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/58.4.p203 · Cited by 908
Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. (2013) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001 · Cited by 837
Devos, T., & Banaji, M. R. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.447 · Cited by 789
Self-citationStereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models
Nadeem, M., Bethke, A., & Reddy, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.416 · Cited by 643
Mere Belonging: The Power of Social Connections
Walton, G. M., Cohen, G. L., Cwir, D., & Spencer, S. J. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025731 · Cited by 543
Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732214549471 · Cited by 471
Gender differences in self-conscious emotional experience: A meta-analysis.
Else-Quest, N. M., Higgins, A., Allison, C., & Morton, L. C. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0027930 · Cited by 464
On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoders
May, C., Wang, A., Bordia, S., Bowman, S. R., & Rudinger, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1063 · Cited by 461
The effect of gender stereotype activation on entrepreneurial intentions
Gupta, V. K., Turban, D. B., & Bhawe, N. M. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1053 · Cited by 433
Turning the knots in your stomach into bows: reappraising arousal improves performance on the GRE
Jamieson, J. P., Mendes, W. B., Blackstock, E., & Schmader, T. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.015 · Cited by 376
Gender bias and stereotypes in Large Language Models
Kotek, H., Dockum, R., & Sun, D. (2023) · Proceedings of The ACM Collective Intelligence Conference · doi:10.1145/3582269.3615599 · Cited by 381
Greenwald, A. G., & Lai, C. K. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050837 · Cited by 364
Self-citation“What about me?” Perceptions of exclusion and Whites' reactions to multiculturalism.
Plaut, V. C., Garnett, F. G., Buffardi, L. E., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022832 · Cited by 331
Twenty Years of Stereotype Threat Research: A Review of Psychological Mediators
Pennington, C. R., Heim, D., Levy, A. R., & Larkin, D. T. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146487 · Cited by 324
A World of Difference: International Trends in Women's Economic Status
Charles, M. (2011) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102548 · Cited by 263
Smith, J. L., Lewis, K. L., Hawthorne, L., & Hodges, S. D. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167212468332 · Cited by 256
The effect of priming gender roles on women's implicit gender beliefs and career aspirations
Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2010) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000027 · Cited by 252
Narrations of race in STEM research settings: Identity formation and its discontents
Malone, K. R., & Barabino, G. (2009) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20307 · Cited by 242
Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2015) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000012 · Cited by 209
Major selection and persistence for women in STEM
Shapiro, C. A., & Sax, L. J. (2011) · New Directions for Institutional Research · doi:10.1002/ir.404 · Cited by 189
Smyth, F. L., & Nosek, B. A. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00415 · Cited by 170
Self-citationImplicit and Explicit Stigma of Mental Illness: Links to Clinical Care
Peris, T. S., Teachman, B. A., & Nosek, B. A. (2008) · Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/nmd.0b013e3181879dfd · Cited by 169
Self-citation“Math is hard!” The effect of gender priming on women's attitudes
Steele, J. R., & Ambady, N. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.06.003 · Cited by 161
The effects of an academic environment intervention on science identification among women in STEM
Ramsey, L. R., Betz, D. E., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2013) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-013-9218-6 · Cited by 152
Forbes, C. E., & Schmader, T. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020971 · Cited by 132
Theodoridis, A. G. (2017) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/692738 · Cited by 117
Plante, I., Théorêt, M., & Favreau, O. E. (2009) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410902971500 · Cited by 91
Data from Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project
(2014) · Journal of Open Psychology Data · doi:10.5334/jopd.ad · Cited by 86
Self-citationLehr, S. A., Caliskan, A., Liyanage, S., & Banaji, M. R. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2404328121 · Cited by 66
Self-citationPolicy Implications of Implicit Social Cognition
Nosek, B. A., & Riskind, R. G. (2012) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2011.01037.x · Cited by 55
Self-citation(2008) · Cited by 55
Simulation Experiments on (the Absence of) Ratings Bias in Reputation Systems
Thebault-Spieker, J., Kluver, D., Klein, M. A., Halfaker, A., Hecht, B., Terveen, L., & Konstan, J. A. (2017) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3134736 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-59
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2102225743
- Cited by
- 941
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 26.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
