The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition.
Abstract
The Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT) is a modification of the Implicit Association Test that measures the strength of evaluative associations with a single attitude object. Across 3 different attitude domains--soda brand preferences, self-esteem, and racial attitudes--the authors found evidence that the SC-IAT is internally consistent and makes unique contributions in the ability to understand implicit social cognition. In a 4th study, the authors investigated the susceptibility of the SC-IAT to faking or self-presentational concerns. Once participants with high error rates were removed, no significant self-presentation effect was observed. These results provide initial evidence for the reliability and validity of the SC-IAT as an individual difference measure of implicit social cognition.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The reliability of the SC-IAT is comparable to the usual reliability of IAT measurements [17].”
From Explicit and implicit attachment and the outcomes of acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for depression (2020) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cites
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013 · Cited by 1,793
Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept
Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1022 · Cited by 1,393
Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.262 · Cited by 821
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1002/per.465 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327965pli1504_01 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.925 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.61.1.27 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.07.003 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.631 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.760 · DOI
- 10.1006/jesp.1999.1418 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0005-7916(02)00024-1 · DOI
- 10.1026//1618-3169.50.2.77 · DOI
- 10.1006/jesp.1997.1331 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225 · DOI
- 10.1038/nn1203-1241 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.47.6.766 · DOI
- Greenwald, 2001, Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3., Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 85, 10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.85 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0146167203258835 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.774 · DOI
- Kihlstrom, 1990, The psychological unconscious., 445
- 10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_9 · DOI
- Mierke, 2001, Implicit association measurement with the IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes., Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 107, 10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.107 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.19.4.395.20759 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.19.6.625.20886 · DOI
- 10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.101 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0146167204271418 · DOI
- Nunnally, 1978, Psychometric theory.
- 10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1477.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.653 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.139 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.494 · DOI
- 10.1027/1618-3169.51.3.165 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/per.531 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.005 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 939
Gawronski, B., & Hahn, A. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429452925-2 · Cited by 58
“…Gast, & Wentura, 2009), the Single-Block IAT (SB-IAT; Teige-Mocigemba, Klauer, & Rothermund, 2008), the Single-Category IAT (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), the Single-Attribute IAT (SA-IAT; Penke, Eichstaedt, & Asendorpf, 2006), and the Brief IAT (BIAT; Sriram & Greenwald,…”
Belletier, C., Robert, A., Moták, L., & Izaute, M. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.029 · Cited by 27
Muschalik, C., Elfeddali, I., Candel, M., & de Vries, H. (2018) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-018-0229-0 · Cited by 25
“The SC-IAT was programmed using Inquisit by Millisecond software and the script was based on Karpinski and Steinman [46].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAttachment security and intergroup contact
Boccato, G., Capozza, D., Trifiletti, E., & di Bernardo, G. A. (2015) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12325 · Cited by 25
Disgust and Sexual Arousal in Young Adult Men and Women
Grauvogl, A., de Jong, P. J., Peters, M. L., Evers, S., van Overveld, M., & van Lankveld, J. J. D. M. (2014) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0349-4 · Cited by 31
Implicit Cognition and Substance Use: The Role of Controlled and Automatic Processes in Children
O’Connor, R. M., Lopez-Vergara, H. I., & Colder, C. R. (2012) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.15288/jsad.2012.73.134 · Cited by 24
“The D-score algorithm for IAT data developed by Greenwald et al. (2003) and adapted for the SC-IAT by Karpinski and Steinman (2006) was used.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPositive Associations Primacy in the IAT
Anselmi, P., Vianello, M., & Robusto, E. (2011) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000106 · Cited by 21
Explicit stigma and implicit biases toward autism in South Korea versus the United States
Kim, S. Y., Cheon, J. E., Gillespie‐Lynch, K., Grandits, J. B., & Kim, Y.-H. (2022) · Autism · doi:10.1177/13623613221140695 · Cited by 27
“We used a single-category IAT, a type of IAT that prior research has shown can have satisfactory reliability and validity (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), to measure participants’ implicit biases toward autism.”
MethodSurvey research in Russia: in the shadow of war
Rosenfeld, B. (2022) · Post-Soviet Affairs · doi:10.1080/1060586x.2022.2151767 · Cited by 24
Sweetman, J., Maio, G. R., Spears, R., Manstead, A. S. R., & Livingstone, A. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.01.001 · Cited by 26
Kleen, H., & Glock, S. (2018) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.04.002 · Cited by 26
Kurdi, B., & Banaji, M. (2017) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2017.1373555 · Cited by 24
“It is a well-known psychometric fact that using noisy manifest measures of underlying latent constructs (such as using an IAT D score to measure implicit attitudes) places an upper bound on the strength of the statistical relationship found between those manifest variables in any given sample (e.g., Furr & Bacharach,…”
InfluentialYoung, K. C., Kashdan, T., & Macatee, R. J. (2015) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2014.920406 · Cited by 24
“A single-category IAT3 design (e.g. Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) might be more appropriate for our research question.”
MethodHouben, K., Roefs, A., & Jansen, A. (2012) · Eating Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2012.03.007 · Cited by 24
Koch, T., Ortner, T. M., Eid, M., Caspers, J., & Schmitt, M. (2014) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000212 · Cited by 34
Senese, V. P., Shinohara, K., Esposito, G., Doi, H., Venuti, P., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2016.09.040 · Cited by 24
Capozza, D., Bernardo, G. A. D., Falvo, R., Vianello, R., & Calò, L. (2016) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12377 · Cited by 17
Guidetti, M., Cavazza, N., & Graziani, A. R. (2014) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2014.33.4.343 · Cited by 28
Keatley, D. A., Clarke, D. D., Ferguson, E., & Hagger, M. S. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00125 · Cited by 26
“Given the implicit nature of measures such as the IAT, there may be greater effects on subsequent behavioral engagement following manipulation of the impulsive system via implicit/subliminal primes..”
BackgroundInfluentialHempel, I. S., Buck, N., Goethals, K., & van Marle, H. (2013) · Sexual abuse. A Journal of Research and Treatment · doi:10.1177/1079063212464660 · Cited by 23
Slabbinck, H., de Houwer, J., & van Kenhove, P. (2013) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.1846 · Cited by 23
“Also, we choose to fix the order of the measures to reduce error variance (Perugini, Richetin, & Zogmaister, 2010) and to limit the large sample size requirements if presentation of all the measures would have been counterbalanced (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
MethodFleischhauer, M., Strobel, A., Enge, S., & Strobel, A. (2013) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.1841 · Cited by 23
“…associations in all participants (as demonstrated for the category ‘relax’ of the NFC-IAT) might produce IAT effects that allow for research on single category assessment and thus might provide a promising alternative to measures such as the single category IATs (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
BackgroundBeattie, G., & Sale, L. (2011) · doi:10.18848/1832-2077/cgp/v07i04/54948 · Cited by 23
“Karpinski and Steinman (2006) ‘…explicit attitude measures were better predictors of deliberative behaviours than IAT scores.’”
BackgroundNapp, C. (2023) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad355 · Cited by 22
“As in (16), our measures of gender stereotype, denoted by GS, rely on the word embedding association test (WEAT), which tweaks the IAT for word embeddings.”
BackgroundInfluentialMuschalik, C., Elfeddali, I., Candel, M., Crutzen, R., & de Vries, H. (2019) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-019-0322-z · Cited by 22
Information leakage in the Response Time‐Based Concealed Information Test
Lukács, G., & Ulrich Ansorge, A. (2019) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3565 · Cited by 26
“…from innocent ones) by adding inducer items to the task (Lukács, 2019; Lukács, Kleinberg, & Verschuere, 2017), inspired by the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998; particularly Bluemke & Friese, 2008; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; see also Agosta & Sartori, 2013).”
BackgroundFatfouta, R., & Schröder–Abé, M. (2018) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2018.07.004 · Cited by 25
When pain is pleasure: Identifying consumer psychopaths
Karampournioti, E., Hennigs, N., & Wiedmann, K. (2018) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21085 · Cited by 25
Chevance, G., Stephan, Y., Héraud, N., & Boiché, J. (2018) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000572 · Cited by 22
“During the Single Category Implicit Association Test, participants are required to sort stimuli representing three categories with only two response keys, each assigned to two of the three categories (e.g., positive sedentary behavior vs. negative; positive vs. negative sedentary behavior; the words used in this study…”
MethodRichard, A., Meule, A., Friese, M., & Blechert, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01591 · Cited by 22
“A SC-IAT (Karpinski and Steinman, 2006; Bluemke and Friese, 2008) was used to assess implicit attitudes toward chocolate.”
MethodThe green brand: Explicit and implicit framing effects of ecolabelling on brand knowledge
Schmidt, S., Langner, S., Hennigs, N., Wiedmann, K.-P., Karampournioti, E., & Lischka, G. (2017) · Cogent Psychology · doi:10.1080/23311908.2017.1329191 · Cited by 22
“Specifically, the implicit measurement approach employed here is similar to the Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT) that was introduced by Karpinski and Steinman (2006).”
MethodRaccuia, L. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163872 · Cited by 22
“They found that for participants who were initially undecided, future (i.e., one week later) opinion about the enlargement of a U.S. military base was significantly predicted by a measure obtained in a Single-Category IAT (SC-IAT) [14].”
Kraus, A. A., & Piqueras-Fiszman, B. (2016) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.11.005 · Cited by 22
On the Relationship Between Automatic Attitudes and Self-Reported Sexual Assault in Men
Widman, L., & Olson, M. (2012) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9970-2 · Cited by 22
“2Although many attitudes objects have a naturally contrasting comparison group where positivity toward one category implies negativity toward the other, rape has no obvious contrasting category (for a similar point, see Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
Blaison, C., Chassard, D., Kop, J., & Gana, K. (2006) · L’Année psychologique · doi:10.4074/s0003503306002065 · Cited by 22
“Par exemple, un IAT d’estime de soi mesurerait en fait la force d’association entre les concepts « Moi – Agréable » comparativement à la force d’association entre les concepts « Pas moi – Agréable » et non la force d’association « Moi – Agréable » en elle-même (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialKolek, L., Šisler, V., Martinková, P., & Brom, C. (2021) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12575 · Cited by 31
It’s Brief But Is It Better? An Evaluation of the Brief Implicit Association Test
Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2010) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000060 · Cited by 23
Self-esteem, ingroup favoritism, and outgroup evaluations: A meta-analysis
Rivera, L. M., Vu, H. A., & Backstrom, V. L. (2024) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302231210496 · Cited by 24
“The Single Category IAT may therefore allow for more precision than the standard dual category IAT.”
InfluentialGlock, S., & Kleen, H. (2020) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100929 · Cited by 29
Wen, F., Zuo, B., Ma, S.-H., Xu, Y., Coley, J., & Wang, Y. (2020) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/1474704920980642 · Cited by 21
“We calculated the D score as the indicator of implicit bias (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Wen & Zuo, 2007), then conducted a one-sample t-test to compare the D score (M ¼ 0.15, SD ¼ 0.45) with the value of 0.”
MethodInfluentialWenzel, M., Woodyatt, L., & McLean, B. (2020) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12378 · Cited by 33
“…assesses the strength of automatic or less controllable associations between two categories (Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998), or the evaluative associations for one entity, the self, as is the case for the Single Category IAT (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) used in the present research.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOlivier, L., Sterkenburg, P., & van Rensburg, E. (2019) · African Journal of Disability · doi:10.4102/ajod.v8i0.328 · Cited by 21
“It measures the implicit social preferences of participants using a categorical computer task where the strongest association between concepts is measured through reaction time (Karpinski & Steinman 2006).”
BackgroundMotivational and implicit processes contribute to incidental physical activity
Oliver, S., & Kemps, E. (2018) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12318 · Cited by 27
Souchon, N., Maio, G., Hanel, P., & Bardin, B. (2016) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12269 · Cited by 21
“For instance, another approach is to use single-category IATs (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
MethodI just love the attention: implicit preference for direct eye contact
Lawson, R. (2015) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2015.1039101 · Cited by 29
“To address this I am conducting further studies using the single category IAT (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) to measure people’s absolute preference for direct gaze and, separately, for averted gaze.”
MethodAckermann, C.-L., & Mathieu, J. (2015) · Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) · doi:10.1177/2051570715579144 · Cited by 19
“The single category IAT involves measuring the strength of evaluative associations with a single attitude object (Karpinski and Steinman, 2006) and has been used in consumer behavior (Florack et al., 2010; Karpinski and Steinman, 2008; Nevid and McClelland, 2010).”
BackgroundKeatley, D. A., Clarke, D. D., & Hagger, M. S. (2012) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02107.x · Cited by 25
“Future research should adopt single-category implicit measures (e.g., the single-category IAT, Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), to address the issue of whether those individuals who have a controlled orientation, explicitly measured, show similar implicit trends.”
MethodInfluentialExtant Empirical Research on Religiosity and Prejudice
Klein, C., Lühr, M., & Streib, H. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-74564-0_2 · Cited by 21
Zhang, Y., Zhou, M., Liang, R., Chen, J., Shi, P., Zheng, Y., Luo, X., Wu, Y., Yu, X., Wu, Y., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific · doi:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101642 · Cited by 18
Contact with grandparents and young people’s explicit and implicit attitudes toward older adults
Liao, T., Zhuoga, C., & Chen, X. (2023) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-023-01344-7 · Cited by 20
“According to the SC-IAT procedures established by Karpinski and Steinman [43], each stage was preceded by a series of instructions focusing on the dimensions of the categorization task and suitable key responses.”
MethodInfluentialAssessing Implicit Attitudes about Androgyny
Atwood, S., & Axt, J. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104162 · Cited by 20
“…deal of prior research seeking to develop novel implicit measures (e.g., Bar-Anan et al., 2009; Nosek & Banaji, 2001; Sriram & Greenwald, 2009; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Bluemke & Friese, 2008), or extend such measures into new topics (e.g., Axt, Conway, et al., 2020; Roddy et al., 2010;…”
BackgroundD’Hooge, S., Hudders, L., & Cauberghe, V. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.1647 · Cited by 26
Barriers to advancing the science and practice of marketing
Baron, A. S., Zaltman, G., & Olson, J. C. (2017) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2017.1323839 · Cited by 30
“…common approach to measuring implicit associations is to use variants of the implicit association test (IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Nosek et al., 2007; Sriram & Greenwald, 2009), the affect misattribution procedure (AMP; Payne, Cheng, Govorun, &…”
MethodHermann, C. A., Nunes, K., & Maimone, S. (2016) · Sexual abuse. A Journal of Research and Treatment · doi:10.1177/1079063216681560 · Cited by 20
“Participants were excluded if they were female (n = 0), failed the quality control questions (n = 17), reported they could not understand written English or were missing data on this item (n = 2), or responded too quickly on the RESC-IAT (n = 1) or RE-IAT (n = 3).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPletzer, B., & Ortner, T. (2016) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.06.012 · Cited by 20
König, L. M., Giese, H., Schupp, H. T., & Renner, B. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01301 · Cited by 22
“A SC-IAT was implemented in Presentation software (Version 17.02) and conducted following the procedure described by Karpinski and Steinman (2006).”
MethodInfluentialAutomatic processes in aggression: Conceptual and assessment issues.
Bluemke, M., & Teige-Mocigemba, S. (2014) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.21576 · Cited by 20
Haines, E. L., & Sumner, K. E. (2013) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.12.004 · Cited by 19
The Category-Focus Implicit Association Test
Siebler, F., González, R., Ordóñez, G., Bohner, G., Haye, A., Sirlopú, D., Millar, A., de Tezanos-Pinto, P., & Torres, D. (2010) · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000015 · Cited by 20
He, J., Song, X., Wang, C., & Zhang, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1098671 · Cited by 23
“85) of the internal consistency coefficient of SC-IAT in previous studies (52).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKuchynka, S. L., Reifsteck, T. V., Gates, A. E., & Rivera, L. M. (2022) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-022-09705-7 · Cited by 27
Implicit and explicit attitudes in transportation research: A literature review
Tosi, J. D., Haworth, N. L., Díaz‐Lázaro, C. M., Poó, F. M., & Ledesma, R. D. (2021) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2020.12.014 · Cited by 27
“These criticisms have sparked the development of alternative versions of the IAT which are based on single targets (Single Category IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), single attributes (Single Attribute IAT; Penke, Eichstaedt, & Asendorpf, 2006), and a shorter completion time (Brief IAT; Sriram & Greenwald, 2009).”
Traffic climate and driver behaviors: Explicit and implicit measures
Uzumcuoglu, Y., & Özkan, T. (2019) · Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.03.016 · Cited by 19
Rapid Response Measurement: Development of a Faking-Resistant Assessment Method for Personality
Meade, A. W., Pappalardo, G., Braddy, P. W., & Fleenor, J. W. (2018) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428118795295 · Cited by 22
“In particular, the response format and the use of response latency is similar to the implicit association test (IAT).”
MethodInfluentialChan, D. K. C., Keatley, D., Tang, T., Dimmock, J., & Hagger, M. (2017) · Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport · doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2017.05.020 · Cited by 19
Measuring Implicit Attitude in Information Systems Research with the Implicit Association Test
Serenko, A., & Turel, O. (2020) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.04719 · Cited by 19
“Last, there are several types of the IAT, and some are more specialized than the others (e.g., Single Category Implicit Association Test (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Trendel et al., 2018), child-oriented Implicit Association Test (Baron & Banaji, 2006), and a personalized version of the IAT (De Houwer, Custers, & De C…”
MethodDentale, F., Vecchione, M., Coro, A. D., & Barbaranelli, C. (2011) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.009 · Cited by 16
Gender Differences in the Implicit and Explicit Perceptions of Sport
Sunderji, S., Murray, R. M., & Sabiston, C. M. (2024) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-024-01499-6 · Cited by 20
“Given that the implicit process is automatic, it is necessary to investigate this phenomenon via indirect measures, such as the Implicit Association Task (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) or priming procedures (Blair & Banaji, 1996).”
InfluentialAn implicit gender sex-science association in the general population and STEM faculty
Marini, M., & Banaji, M. R. (2020) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.2020.1853502 · Cited by 21
“Implicit gender sex-science beliefs SC-IAT scores were computed as IAT scores in Experiment 1.”
MethodInfluentialZenko, Z., & Panteleimon Ekkekakis, A. (2019) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.2017-0349 · Cited by 22
Richard, A., Meule, A., & Blechert, J. (2019) · Eating Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2019.01.006 · Cited by 22
“A SC-IAT (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) was used for assessing implicit evaluation of chocolate.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialImplicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Sex and Romance in Asexuals
Bulmer, M., & Izuma, K. (2017) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2017.1303438 · Cited by 19
“To circumvent this problem, we used the SC-IAT, which can capture negative or positive associations with a single concept, rather than comparing two concepts (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
MethodBrain reactivity to alcohol and cannabis marketing during sobriety and intoxication
Perna, E. B. D. S. F., Theunissen, E. L., Kuypers, K. P. C., Evers, E. A. T., Stiers, P. L. J., Toennes, S. W., Witteman, J., Dalen, W. E. V., & Ramaekers, J. G. (2016) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/adb.12351 · Cited by 26
Implicit Associations and Explicit Expectancies toward Cannabis in Heavy Cannabis Users and Controls
Beraha, E. M., Cousijn, J., Hermanides, E., Goudriaan, A. E., & Wiers, R. W. H. J. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00059 · Cited by 20
“Using Single Category Implicit Association Tests (SC-IATs; Karpinski and Steinman, 2006), it was found that implicit positive-arousal associations toward cannabis predicted cannabis use, over and beyond explicit measures of affective expectancies.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialClerkin, E. M., & Teachman, B. (2009) · Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/nmd.0b013e3181b05d7f · Cited by 18
“Given these methodological challenges, we believe that future research investigating automatic appearance evaluations in BDD should consider tasks that do not require a relative comparison category (e.g., the Single Category IAT; Karpinski and Steinman, 2006).”
The Breadth–Based Adjective Rating Task (BART) as an Indirect Measure of Self–Esteem
Karpinski, A., Steinberg, J. A., Versek, B., & Alloy, L. B. (2007) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.6.778 · Cited by 14
Self-citationMoral emotions in predatory and impulsive offenders using implicit measures
Cima, M., Tonnaer, F., & Lobbestael, J. (2007) · doi:10.1007/bf03061076 · Cited by 18
“Some investigators used an error rate of 20% as excluding criterion (e.g., Karpinski & Steinman, 2006 ), while others usederrorrateshigherthan26%(Knutson,Wood,Spumpinato & Grafman, 2006) and 40% (Heider & Skowronski, 2007) as exclusion criterion.”
MethodIntranasal oxytocin enhances positive self-attribution in healthy men
Colonnello, V., & Heinrichs, M. (2014) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.06.016 · Cited by 17
“Following a validated protocol [17], the stimuli used for the SC-IAT were composed of a list of positive (i.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialConceptual and Historical Perspectives
Cloninger, S. C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.004 · Cited by 8
Neural signals in amygdala predict implicit prejudice toward an ethnic outgroup
Izuma, K., Aoki, R., Shibata, K., & Nakahara, K. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.019 · Cited by 24
“After completing the two SC-IATs, each participant was asked to complete a semantic differential scale (Greenwald et al., 1998; Karpinski and Steinman, 2006), which measures explicit attitudes toward Japan and South Korea.”
InfluentialImplicit Criminal Identity and Age: Implications for Criminal Persistence and Desistance
Veysey, B., & Rivera, L. M. (2017) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854817722173 · Cited by 17
“The SC-IAT was scored in accordance with established procedures (Greenwald, Nosek, & Banaji, 2003; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
Wang, Y., Zhu, J., Hu, Y., Fang, Y., Wang, G., Cui, X., & Wang, L. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01699 · Cited by 17
O’Connor, R. M., & Colder, C. R. (2015) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.15288/jsad.2015.76.884 · Cited by 21
“The Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) is a modification of the widely used IAT (see Reich et al., 2010).”
MethodThe value of an implicit self-associative measure specific to core beliefs of depression
Lemmens, L. H. J. M., Roefs, A., Arntz, A. R., van Teeseling, H. C., Peeters, F. P. M. L., & Huibers, M. J. H. (2013) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.10.006 · Cited by 20
Predicting Dental Flossing Behavior: The Role of Implicit and Explicit Responses and Beliefs
Millar, M. (2011) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2010.539949 · Cited by 17
“Thus, the present research employed a modified Single Category Implicit Associations Test (SC-IAT) developed by Karpinski and Steinman (2006) to measure implicit responses to flossing.”
MethodResultInfluentialSelf-symbols as implicit motivators
Holland, R. W., Wennekers, A., Bijlstra, G., Jongenelen, M. M., & van Knippenberg, A. (2009) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.4.579 · Cited by 17
“Participants started the experiment with a single target Implicit Association Task (st-IAT; see Wigboldus, Holland, & Van Knippenberg, 2005; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) that served to measure their implicit self-esteem.”
MethodConsumer Acceptance of Novel Foods
Fischer, A. R. H., & Reinders, M. J. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-803751-5.00014-3 · Cited by 8
Indirect Assessment of Implicit Disgust Sensitivity
Zinkernagel, A., Hofmann, W., Dislich, F. X. R., Gschwendner, T., & Schmitt, M. J. (2011) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000078 · Cited by 17
Baum, C. M., Steur, H. D., & Lagerkvist, C. J. (2023) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104957 · Cited by 26
DeYoung, C. G., & Blain, S. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.026 · Cited by 34
Lee, K.-H., & Kim, D.-Y. (2017) · doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2016.06.006 · Cited by 16
Mattavelli, S., Avishai, A., Perugini, M., Richetin, J., & Sheeran, P. (2017) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-016-9874-9 · Cited by 16
The Role of Implicit Associations in the Hypothetical Bias
Verneau, F., la Barbera, F., & del Giudice, T. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/joca.12116 · Cited by 16
What Makes Social Work Students Implement Evidence-Based Practice Behaviors?
Shapira, Y., Enosh, G., & Havron, N. (2017) · Journal of Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/10437797.2016.1260507 · Cited by 16
“The IAT gauges unintentional and uncontrolled reactions that participants cannot fake (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRebar, A., Schoeppe, S., Alley, S., Short, C., Dimmock, J., Jackson, B., Conroy, D. E., Rhodes, R., & Vandelanotte, C. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01277 · Cited by 16
“…tools researchers can use to assess automatic evaluations including the Implicit Association Test (or variations thereof; Greenwald et al., 1998; Karpinski and Steinman, 2006; Siram and Greenwald, 2009), the evaluative priming method (Fazio et al., 1995; Eves et al., 2007), or the impulsive…”
MethodDisentangling Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients’ Implicit and Explicit Attitudes toward Methotrexate
Linn, A., Vandeberg, L., Wennekers, A., Vervloet, M., van Dijk, L., & van den Bemt, B. V. D. (2016) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2016.00233 · Cited by 16
“To measure patients’ implicit attitudes and associations, the Single Category Implicit-Association Test (SC-IAT) was used, which is a well-established and valid measure of implicit associations (Karpinski and Steinman, 2006).”
MethodFriese, M., Gianotti, L. R. R., & Knoch, D. (2016) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000179 · Cited by 16
Assessing Children’s Implicit Attitudes Using the Affect Misattribution Procedure
Williams, A., Steele, J. R., & Lipman, C. (2016) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2015.1061527 · Cited by 16
“In conjunction with the success of validating the traditional IAT and different priming measures for use with children, it would be useful to adapt additional IAT-based measures and scoring procedures, such as the single-category IAT (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006;)”
Implicit associations in social anxiety disorder: The effects of comorbid depression
Wong, J., Morrison, A. S., Heimberg, R. G., Goldin, P. R., & Gross, J. J. (2014) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.05.008 · Cited by 16
Teoria funcionalista dos valores humanos: evidências de sua adequação no contexto paraibano
de Medeiros, É. D., Gouveia, V., Gusmão, E. É. D. S., Milfont, T., da Fonsêca, P. D., & de Aquino, T. A. D. (2012) · doi:10.1590/s1678-69712012000300003 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Temple University (US)
- ORCID
- Karpinski, Andrew
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-32
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W1998043162
- Cited by
- 1,108
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 57
- FWCI
- 107.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- Single Category Implicit Association Test, Implicit Association Test, implicit social cognition, evaluative associations, attitude measurement, self-esteem, racial attitudes, self-presentation, faking, reliability statistics, validity, individual differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Association Learning, Attitude, Awareness, Choice Behavior, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Individuality, Internal-External Control, Male, Personality Inventory, Prejudice, Psychometrics, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Students, Reproducibility of Results, Black People, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review