The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition.
Abstract
The Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT) is a modification of the Implicit Association Test that measures the strength of evaluative associations with a single attitude object. Across 3 different attitude domains--soda brand preferences, self-esteem, and racial attitudes--the authors found evidence that the SC-IAT is internally consistent and makes unique contributions in the ability to understand implicit social cognition. In a 4th study, the authors investigated the susceptibility of the SC-IAT to faking or self-presentational concerns. Once participants with high error rates were removed, no significant self-presentation effect was observed. These results provide initial evidence for the reliability and validity of the SC-IAT as an individual difference measure of implicit social cognition.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The reliability of the SC-IAT is comparable to the usual reliability of IAT measurements [17].”
From Explicit and implicit attachment and the outcomes of acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for depression (2020) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cites
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013 · Cited by 1,793
Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept
Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1022 · Cited by 1,393
Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.262 · Cited by 821
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1002/per.465 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327965pli1504_01 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.925 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.61.1.27 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.07.003 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.631 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.760 · DOI
- 10.1006/jesp.1999.1418 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0005-7916(02)00024-1 · DOI
- 10.1026//1618-3169.50.2.77 · DOI
- 10.1006/jesp.1997.1331 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225 · DOI
- 10.1038/nn1203-1241 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.47.6.766 · DOI
- Greenwald, 2001, Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3., Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 85, 10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.85 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0146167203258835 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.774 · DOI
- Kihlstrom, 1990, The psychological unconscious., 445
- 10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_9 · DOI
- Mierke, 2001, Implicit association measurement with the IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes., Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 107, 10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.107 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.19.4.395.20759 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.19.6.625.20886 · DOI
- 10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.101 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0146167204271418 · DOI
- Nunnally, 1978, Psychometric theory.
- 10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1477.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.653 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.139 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.494 · DOI
- 10.1027/1618-3169.51.3.165 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/per.531 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.005 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 939
Implicit Measures as a Useful Tool for Evaluating User Experience
Actis-Grosso, R., Capellini, R., Ghedin, F., & Tassistro, F. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78092-0_1 · Cited by 5
Measurement Methods to Assess Intellectual Disability Stigma
Werner, S. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-52499-7_2 · Cited by 6
Rahamim, O., Bar‐Anan, Y., Shahar, G., & Meiran, N. (2013) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000126 · Cited by 6
Cereghetti, D., Coppin, G., Cayeux, I., Ohla, K., Gómez-Corona, C., & Vigneau, E. (2025) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105653 · Cited by 5
Beyond Good or Bad: The Four Evaluative Quadrants of Relationships
Righetti, F., Đurić, M., & Schneider, I. K. (2024) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683241302247 · Cited by 4
Filleul, V., d’Arripe-Longueville, F., Meinadier, E., Maillot, J., Chan, D. K. C., Scoffier‐Mériaux, S., & Corrion, K. (2023) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.651 · Cited by 6
Factors determining implicit attitudes toward sports and exercise: desirability and enjoyment
Ohashi, M. M., Sawaumi, T., Iume, Y., & Togo, E. (2023) · Discover Psychology · doi:10.1007/s44202-023-00073-7 · Cited by 5
“We need to adopt alternative measurements, such as the single-category IAT developed by Karpinski and Steinman [44].”
MethodImplicit and explicit measurement of pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward autism spectrum disorder
Pérez, I. L., Cerezuela, G. P., Mínguez, R. T., & Lüke, T. (2023) · European Journal of Special Needs Education · doi:10.1080/08856257.2023.2185858 · Cited by 7
“The average error rate was 4.97% before the short-term training and 6.27% after the short-term training, which were consistent with error rates obtained in previous research (Cage and Doyle 2021; Karpinski and Steinman 2006).”
ResultInfluentialBaur, J., Krohmer, K., Naumann, E., & Svaldi, J. (2022) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2022.104210 · Cited by 9
Epifania, O. M., Robusto, E., & Anselmi, P. (2022) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-022-01703-w · Cited by 8
“…the sorting paired features task (SPF; Bar-Anan et al., 2009), the Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP; Payne et al., 2005), the Single Category IAT (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), the Brief IAT (B-IAT; Sriram & Greenwald, 2009), and the Evaluative Priming Task (EPT; Fazio et al., 1986).”
MethodXu, J., & Jiangbo, L. (2022) · Mobile Information Systems · doi:10.1155/2022/4914792 · Cited by 10
“The SC-IAT results were calculated by a scoring means proposed by Karpinski and Steinman [7].”
MethodColledani, D., Anselmi, P., & Robusto, E. (2021) · Health Psychology Report · doi:10.5114/hpr.2021.111292 · Cited by 5
“The D-scores at the two SC-IATs were calculated according to the indications in the literature (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
MethodAn Open-Source Web App for Creating and Scoring Qualtrics-based Implicit Association Test
Cui, Y., Robinson, J. D., Kim, S., Kypriotakis, G., Green, C., Shete, S., & Cinciripini, P. (2021) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.02267 · Cited by 5
“For instance, the single target IAT (Karpinski and Steinman, 2006) is not directly supported by our app.”
BackgroundCan't fight seeing sadness in tears: Measuring the implicit association between tears and sadness.
Chew, W.-O., & Ito, K. (2021) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12503 · Cited by 5
Preservice Teachers’ Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Towards Teaching and Learning
Zaruba, N., Westphal, A., Antoniewicz, F., & Vock, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.619098 · Cited by 6
Rasch gone mixed: A mixed model approach to the Implicit Association TestPreprint
Epifania, O. M., Robusto, E., & Anselmi, P. (2020) · doi:10.31124/advance.13227713.v1 · Cited by 3
“Given their flexibility, these models can be used for modeling data from other implicit measures similar to the IAT, such as the Single Category IAT (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) or the Go/No-Go Association Task (GNAT; Nosek & Banaji, 2001).”
MethodApproach–Avoidance Theories of Personality
Corr, P. J., & Krupıć, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.025 · Cited by 12
An Investigation of Civilian Implicit Attitudes Toward Police Officers
Sargent, R. H., & Newman, L. (2020) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-019-09330-9 · Cited by 5
“…Spearman-Brown correction to compensate for the underestimated reliability that comes from halving a measure, internal consistency correlation coefficients increased to .72, .69, .77, and .82 for IAT version 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively (Houben, Nosek, & Wiers, 2010; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
BackgroundImplicit measures with reproducible results: The implicitMeasures package
Epifania, O., Anselmi, P., & Robusto, E. (2020) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.02394 · Cited by 5
“Among implicit measures, the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998) and the Single Category IAT (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) are the mostly common used ones (Ottavia M Epifania et al., 2020b).”
BackgroundMethodHeuckelum, M., Hebing, R. C., Vandeberg, L., Linn, A., Flendrie, M., Nurmohamed, M., Dulmen, S., Ende, C. H. M., & Bemt, B. (2020) · Arthritis care & research · doi:10.1002/acr.24186 · Cited by 5
Glock, S., & Kleen, H. (2019) · Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs · doi:10.1111/1471-3802.12475 · Cited by 5
Meisel, S. N., Read, J. P., Mullin, S., Shyhalla, K., Colder, C. R., Eiden, R. D., Hawk, L. W., & Wieczorek, W. F. (2018) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/adb0000400 · Cited by 5
“A Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) was used to assess automatic alcohol associations.”
MethodFalse memories, but not false beliefs, affect implicit attitudes for food preferences.
Howe, D., Anderson, R. J., & Dewhurst, S. (2017) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.07.002 · Cited by 5
Pilch, I., & Hyla, M. (2017) · Polish Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1515/ppb-2017-0030 · Cited by 8
Can Magic Deception Be Detected at an Unconscious Level?
Kawakami, N., & Miura, E. (2017) · Perception · doi:10.1177/0301006616682513 · Cited by 5
“The procedure was the same as in Experiment 1 with the following exceptions: In the magic video, the position of the red cup and blue cup and the right or left position of the correct ball were counterbalanced across participants; and in the SC-IAT, we used the category labels red and blue instead of left and right.”
MethodInfluentialImplicit vs. explicit dimensions of guilt and dominance in criminal psychopathy.
Nentjes, L., Bernstein, D., Cima, M., & Wiers, R. (2017) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.03.006 · Cited by 5
“The degree to which participants associated themselves with dominance was assessed with a Sc-IAT (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), which is an adaptation of the IAT (Greenwald et al., 1998).”
InfluentialImplicit Intergroup Bias and the Long Road to Predicting Discrimination
Dunham, Y. C. (2017) · doi:10.1002/9781118773123.ch10 · Cited by 5
Kudo, D., & Nagaya, K. (2017) · doi:10.1002/mar.20992 · Cited by 5
StopAbleism: Reduksi stigma kepada penyandang disabilitas melalui intervensi bias implisit
Yusainy, C., Thohari, S., & Gustomy, R. (2016) · Jurnal Psikologi · doi:10.22146/jpsi.9168 · Cited by 10
“Satu terobosan untuk mengukur stigma implisit adalah melalui paradigma computer-based response-latency task yang dinamai Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
MethodInfluentialThe effects of implicit anxiety on the performance of skin self‐examinations
Millar, M. G., & Westfall, R. S. (2015) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12321 · Cited by 4
When “They” becomes “We”: Multiple contrasting identities in mixed status groups
Sanchez, A. K., Zogmaister, C., & Arcuri, L. (2007) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298860601128255 · Cited by 5
“…tension in realworld settings, there is reason to believe that intergroup biases go under detected in research due to self-presentation efforts by participants (see Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Maass, Castelli, & Arcuri, 2000; Nosek, 2005; Zogmaister et al., 2006, for a general discussion).”
BackgroundFagioli, S., Watanabe, D. K., Koenig, J., Free, M., Fazio, R. H., Vasey, M., & Thayer, J. F. (2025) · Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback · doi:10.1007/s10484-025-09686-1 · Cited by 4
“For the pur - pose of this study, a personalized single-category version of the classic IAT (PIAT) was administered before and after the exposure treatment (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Olson & Fazio, 2004; Vasey et al., 2012).”
Item-level implicit affective measures reveal the uncanny valley of robot faces
Yamaguchi, M. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103443 · Cited by 7
Yu, G., Lu, X., & Sun, X. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38784 · Cited by 5
“In 2006, Karpinski et al. developed the Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT) [16].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFontesse, S., Chevallereau, T., Stinglhamber, F., Demoulin, S., Fiorito, A. M., Chatard, A., Jaafari, N., & Maurage, P. (2023) · Journal of Addictive Diseases · doi:10.1080/10550887.2023.2292303 · Cited by 4
“29 In this task, two fixed categories are determined (“ animal ” and “ human ” for animal-istic self-dehumanization) and one other category (here, “ myself ”) is associated once to one category (“ animal ” for the incongruent block) and once to the other (“ human ” for the congruent block).”
An automatic red-female association tested by the Stroop task.
Chen, N., Nakamura, K., & Watanabe, K. (2023) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.31234/osf.io/9vep6 · Cited by 4
Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation?
Orellana-Corrales, G., Matschke, C., Schäfer, S., & Wesslein, A. (2022) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218221124928 · Cited by 4
“Importantly, due to the use of complementary pairs of categories in the IAT, its results can only be interpreted as relative strengths of associations in comparison to one another (see Greenwald & Farnham, 2000; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
Discrimination in post-conflict settings: Experimental evidence from Colombia
Unfried, K., Diaz, M. I., & Restrepo-Plazaz, L. M. (2022) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105877 · Cited by 4
A call to use psychology for anti-racist jury selection.
Faber, S. C., Strauss, D., Gran-Ruaz, S. M., Torre, J. T. L., Bartlett, A., Faber, I., Levinson, A., & Williams, M. T. (2022) · Practice Innovations · doi:10.1037/pri0000172 · Cited by 4
“…aversive racism, the computer-administered Black-White Implicit Association test (BW-IAT;Greenwald et al., 1998) or the Single Category IAT (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), may prove useful, especially when used in concert with the aforementioned questions (see Table 1 and Supplemental Table.”
BackgroundMethodTomczyk, S., Pielmann, D., & Schmidt, S. (2022) · European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10610-022-09508-8 · Cited by 4
“Finally, participants completed a picture-based Single Category Implicit Association Test (adapted from Karpinski & Steinman 2006) using the Inquisit software (www. milli second. com) by pairing seven target pictures of right-wing rallies and assemblies with positive (e.g., joy, happy) and negative…”
MethodGonzález‐Sanguino, C., & Muñoz, M. (2022) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/nmd.0000000000001516 · Cited by 6
Fact or Faction Regarding the Relationship between Cannabis Use and Violent Behavior
Rafiei, D., & Kolla, N. (2021) · The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law · doi:10.29158/jaapl.210034-21 · Cited by 4
Exploring Implicit and Explicit Attitudes of Employees’ Authentic Organizational Loyalty
Hong, J., Hong, A., & Kim, S. R. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666869 · Cited by 4
Visuospatial perspective shifting and relational self-association in dispositional shame and guilt
Chiu, C., Siu, C. Y., Ng, H. C., & Baldwin, M. W. (2021) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2021.103140 · Cited by 3
Humanness Is Not Always Positive: Automatic Associations between Incivilities and Human Symbols
Rodríguez-Gómez, L., Delgado, N., Betancor, V., Chen-Xia, X. J., & Pérez, A. R. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18084353 · Cited by 4
“The single category IAT (SC-IAT) has been developed to overcome this restriction and has shown solid support for validity and reliability as another implicit measure of social cognition [50].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDegner, J., & Calanchini, J. (2020) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2020.38.supp.s135 · Cited by 2
“Categorical Versus Exemplar-based Attitude Measurement Though several IAT variants have been developed over the years (e.g., Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Meissner & Rothermund, 2013; Nosek, Bar-Anan, Sriram, Axt, & Greenwald, 2014; Teige-Mocigemba, Klauer, & Rothermund, 2008; Wigboldus, Holland, &…”
Basic Needs, Goals and Motivation
Szalma, J. L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.030 · Cited by 3
Personality, Preferences and Socioeconomic Behavior
Ferguson, E., Zhao, K., & Smillie, L. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.044 · Cited by 6
Models of Physical Health and Personality
Heilmayr, D., & Friedman, H. S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.019 · Cited by 2
Cognitive Processes and Models
Matthews, G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.028 · Cited by 5
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. (2020) · The SAGE Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.4135/9781446201022.n34 · Cited by 4
Maraldi, E. D. O., & Farias, M. (2019) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508619.2019.1661198 · Cited by 5
“In this test, participants have considerable less conscious control over their choices than in traditional self-report measures and are thus less prone to “faking” their responses (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Steffens, 2004).”
BackgroundThe Different Roles of Expectations in Phonetic and Lexical Processing
Lev-Ari, S., Dodsworth, R., Mielke, J., & Peperkamp, S. (2019) · Interspeech · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2019-1795 · Cited by 4
Multisensory Facial Stimulation Implicitly Improves Evaluations of the Goodness of Attractive Others
Jeong, J. W., Chang, E., & Kim, H. T. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01239 · Cited by 3
“For this purpose, we used the Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT) (Karpinski and Steinman, 2006), which presents two attributes (good and bad) and one concept (other).”
MethodInfluentialCountry Stereotypes, Initial Trust, and Cooperation in Global Software Development Teams
Wang, Y., & Zhang, M. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE) · doi:10.1109/icgse.2019.00036 · Cited by 6
“We used the Single-Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT: [49]) to assess each individual’s implicit country stereotypes.”
MethodNoel, J. G., Petzel, Z. W., & Mulderig, T. H. (2019) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/adb0000449 · Cited by 7
“Although the meaning of IAT scores and alternative approaches to assessing implicit responses are debated in the literature (e.g., Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Payne, Cheng, Govorun, & Stewart, 2005), the IAT’s predictive validity is well established, particularly within alcohol research (Farris et…”
BackgroundMethodJohann, D., & Thomas, K. (2018) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/2053168018768136 · Cited by 4
“Implicit associations are relatively unconscious evaluations that are automatically activated by a particular stimulus (Murphy and Eckhardt, 2005; Johann et al., 2018; also Gawronski and Bodenhausen, 2006; Greenwald et al., 1998; Greenwald et al., 2005; Johann et al., forthcoming; Karpinski and Steinman, 2006; Ksiazki…”
BackgroundMethodLiu, Y., Chen, H., Li, S.-H., & Luo, N. (2017) · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2017.00219 · Cited by 4
The Implicit Associations Between Religious and Nonreligious Supernatural Constructs
Weeks, M., & Gilmore, A. (2017) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508619.2016.1265044 · Cited by 4
“We used a singlecategory IAT (SC_IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) to assess the associational strength between categories of NRS and RS concepts.”
MethodImplicit associations with social status: the effects of relationship involvement
Millar, M. (2009) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.05.002 · Cited by 4
Using word embeddings to investigate human psychology: Methods and applications
Bao, H., Zi-Xi, W. A. N. G., CHENG, X., Su, Z., Yang, Y., ZHANG, G.-Y., Wang, B., & Cai, H. (2023) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2023.00887 · Cited by 11
Schmidt, S., Wiedmann, K.-P., Reiter, P. J., & Kurlbaum, C. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-05262-1_5-1 · Cited by 4
Tang, Y., Wang, Z., & Yuan, Z. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1587965 · Cited by 5
Brunner, T. A., Künzi, H. N., Ha, T. M., Ngô, M. H., Bui, T. L., Nguyen, A. D., Le, N. T., & Lucas, B. F. (2025) · Future Foods · doi:10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100780 · Cited by 3
Velicu, A., Winter, F., Rathmann, J. M. K., & Rauhut, H. (2025) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-025-05357-4 · Cited by 2
“The SC-IAT differs from the regular IAT by focusing on a single category instead of assessing associations between two contrasting categories (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
Xu, Q.-J., Liu, S.-Q., Li, M.-H., Wang, X., Li, J.-R., Yuan, X.-R., Yang, M.-M., Yang, M.-Y., Jiang, Z., Gou, Q., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1426891 · Cited by 3
Wang, X., Lv, Q., Lu, M., & Qu, W. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-95723-2 · Cited by 3
“Finally, for the implicit measures experiment, we applied the reaction time preprocessing method proposed by Karpinski and Steinman 28 .”
Hou, S., Wang, J., Gao, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, H.-Y., Li, Z., & Jing, L. (2025) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.03.010 · Cited by 3
Burberg, T., Würth, S., Amesberger, G., & Finkenzeller, T. (2024) · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living · doi:10.3389/fspor.2024.1210546 · Cited by 3
Kleinert, M. (2023) · Politische Vierteljahresschrift · doi:10.1007/s11615-023-00500-3 · Cited by 4
“Following established procedures (Karpinski and Steinman 2006), D-scores were derived from the collected reaction times.”
InfluentialLi, S., Cheng, S. Y., Shangguan, C., Li, X., & Li, X. (2023) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108653 · Cited by 3
Effects of fitspiration on believability and intention to exercise
Berry, T., Locke, S., & Ori, E. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1094276 · Cited by 3
“Implicit attitudes A single-category implicit association task (SC-IAT; Karpinski and Steinman, 2006) had participants categorize words as quickly as possible by pressing keys on a computer keyboard.”
BackgroundSaad, M. K., Rivera, L. M., & Veysey, B. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.787583 · Cited by 3
Social Class Priming Effect on Prosociality: Evidence from Explicit and Implicit Measures
Zhang, S., Zang, X., Zhang, S., & Zhang, F. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19073984 · Cited by 4
“Experiment 2 employed an implicit task of SC-IAT, which was a more accurate measure of implicit attitude [41] to explore the degree to which prosocial behaviors were integrated into the participants’ selfconcepts.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe pressure and the lack of cognitive resource: evidences for duality of attitudes
Chen, D., Yan, S., & Fei, D.-Z. (2022) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-022-09540-0 · Cited by 3
Reciprocal associations between implicit attitudes and drinking in emerging adulthood
Paige, K. J., Weigard, A. S., & Colder, C. R. (2022) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.14759 · Cited by 3
Meyer, T., Nelson, J., & Nexhmedin Morina, B. (2021) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.1080/20008198.2021.2003993 · Cited by 4
“Following the procedure of Karpinski and Steinman (2006) implemented in Inquisit (v4; Millisecond Software), single word stimuli were presented in the middle of the screen and had to be categorized as quickly and accurately as possible by the participant, using the left (‘e’) or right…”
MethodInfluentialBaur, J., Schmitz, F., Naumann, E., & Svaldi, J. (2021) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-021-10271-z · Cited by 5
“To assess implicit attitudes towards one’s own body, a single-category (SC)-IAT (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) was used, which facilitates the interpretation of the score as the relative evaluation of this concept category.”
MethodBerry, T. R., & Myre, M. (2021) · Obesity Science & Practice · doi:10.1002/osp4.492 · Cited by 4
Selimbegović, L., Collange, J., Bocage-Barthélémy, Y., & Chatard, A. (2021) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.442 · Cited by 4
“We used the single-category version because we were only interested in implicit self-evaluation of beauty ( Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
MethodCage, E., & Doyle, T. (2024) · International Journal of Disability Development and Education · doi:10.1080/1034912x.2024.2408674 · Cited by 7
“The words were from Karpinski and Steinman (2006; positive words: wonderful, excellent, friendly, likeable, happy, triumphant, cheerful, pleasure ; negative words: tragic, dislike, angry, humiliate, horrible, nasty, terrible, unpleasant ).”
InfluentialThe Unique Role of Regulatory Mode Orientations in Implicit and Explicit Self-Forgiveness
Pierro, A., Pica, G., Dentale, F., Gelfand, M. J., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2020) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000433 · Cited by 4
“…tasks (e.g., the Implicit Association Test, Greenwald et al., 1998; and/or its variants, e.g., the Single Category Implicit Association Test, Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) could have been adapted to measure selfforgiveness, we decided not to use them as they may create relevant ambiguity in…”
MethodPersonality Traits and Mental Disorders
Hakulinen, C. A., Jokela, M. M., Mika Kivimaki, B., & Elovainio, M. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.018 · Cited by 4
Jayawickreme, E., & Zachry, C. E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.032 · Cited by 2
Anxiety, Depression and Cognitive Dysfunction
Eysenck, M. W., & Holmes, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.033 · Cited by 3
Personality in Cross-Cultural Perspective
Dragūns, J. G., & Tanaka‐Matsumi, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.037 · Cited by 4
Marital Attitudes and Implicit Associations Tests (IAT) among Young Adults
Hall, S. S., & Lee, K. (2020) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/0192513x20949899 · Cited by 6
“For example, a single target IAT was used to measure perfectionism (De Cuyper et al., 2013), attitudes toward Coke (Karpinsky & Steinman, 2006), and seduction tendencies (Hempel et al., 2013).”
MethodWhen and for Whom Implicit Partner Evaluations Predict Forgiveness
Faure, R., Righetti, F., Larson, G. M., Cuellar, M., Koutsoumpis, A., Zwicker, M. V., & Hofmann, W. (2020) · Social Psychology and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550620936476 · Cited by 3
“To measure their implicit partner evaluations, we used a Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
MethodSachs, N. M., Veysey, B., & Rivera, L. M. (2020) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260520922368 · Cited by 3
“We measured implicit self-victim associations with a Single-Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; also see Greenwald et al., 1998), which measures individual differences in strength of evaluative associations with a single attitude object.”
Dentale, F., Vecchione, M., Shariff, A. F., Verrastro, V., Petruccelli, I., Diotaiuti, P., Petruccelli, F., & Barbaranelli, C. (2018) · Psychology of Religion and Spirituality · doi:10.1037/rel0000141 · Cited by 3
Assessment of the implicit attitude of Japanese people toward blacks and Little Black Sambo
Mori, K. (2018) · Open Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.4236/jss.2018.61001 · Cited by 3
“It is desirable to use the single category version of IAT (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) [22], or the single-target paper-based IAT as used in this study, to re-examine the Greenwald et al. results.”
MethodSachs, N. M., Veysey, B., & Rivera, L. M. (2017) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260517741625 · Cited by 3
“We adopt a Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) to measure IVI and IVSS.”
Booth, P., Albery, I., & Frings, D. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014361 · Cited by 3
“The algorithm used by Bardin et al 24 and Karpinski and Steinman 43 based on the D score from Greenwald et al 44 will be used when analysing the data.”
MethodNews Media Depictions of Obama Influence Automatic Attitudes: Implications for the Obama Effect
March, D. S., Kendrick, R. V., Fritzlen, K. A., & Olson, M. (2016) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2016.34.6.504 · Cited by 3
“Therefore, the SCIAT was employed because it does not require a contrast category (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
MethodInfluentialRivera, L. M., & Plant, E. (2016) · doi:10.1521/soco.2016.34.6.495 · Cited by 3
RESEARCH OF SELF-ESTEEM OF YOUTH USING IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TESTS AND SELF-REPORTED PROCEDURES
Plotka, I., Blumenau, N., Ozola, E., Pogildjakova, S., & Drozdova, J. (2016) · SOCIETY INTEGRATION EDUCATION Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference · doi:10.17770/sie2016vol1.1511 · Cited by 3
“The Single Category IAT (SC-IAT) is a modification of the IAT that measures the strength of evaluative associations with a single attitude object (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
MethodInfluentialRESEARCH OF IMPLICIT ATTITUDES TOWARDS GAMBLING FOR GAMBLERS AND NON-GAMBLERS
Plotka, I., Blumenau, N., & Vinogradova, Z. (2016) · doi:10.17770/sie2016vol1.1529 · Cited by 3
“This paper presents a study using SC-IAT method to research attitudes towards gambling on the sample of problem gamblers, social gamblers and nongamblers.”
MethodInfluentialImplicit-Explicit Evaluative Discrepancies in Depression and Information Seeking
Johnson, I. R., & McDonough-Caplan, H. (2016) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2016.34.3.238 · Cited by 3
Do implicit female negative associations with mathematics display cultural or regional biases?
del Angel, R. D., & Verzi, D. (2016) · doi:10.1080/09720529.2015.1084785 · Cited by 3
“Results of earlier studies (Nosek et al. 2002; Greenwald et al. 2006; Karpinski and Steinman, 2006) demonstrate that female implicit attitudes are more negative about mathematics and they associate mathematics more strongly with masculine words than male implicit attitudes and associations.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Temple University (US)
- ORCID
- Karpinski, Andrew
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-32
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W1998043162
- Cited by
- 1,108
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 57
- FWCI
- 107.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- Single Category Implicit Association Test, Implicit Association Test, implicit social cognition, evaluative associations, attitude measurement, self-esteem, racial attitudes, self-presentation, faking, reliability statistics, validity, individual differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Association Learning, Attitude, Awareness, Choice Behavior, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Individuality, Internal-External Control, Male, Personality Inventory, Prejudice, Psychometrics, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Students, Reproducibility of Results, Black People, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review