The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition.

“The SingleCategory Implicit Association (Karpinski and Steinman, 2006), which only has one target category, has been developed to address this problem.”

“Second, it used a different measure of implicit attitude, the Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT; Karpinski and Steinman 2006).”

“…Teige-Mocigemba et al., 2008), in which compatible and incompatible trials can occur in the same block and are determined by the position of the target word on the screen; The single-category IAT (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) assesses the relationship between “self ” and valence attributes.”

“In other existential psychological research on consumption, Friese and Hofmann (2008) showed that mortality salience increased eating as a function of higher scores on an implicit measure of impulsiveness (the implicit association test; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”

“The model depicted in Figure 1 specified an “IATmethod factor” that accounted for method variance in the IAT, BIAT, GNAT, single-target IAT (ST-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), and SPF and a “Priming method factor” that accounted for method variance in EPT and AMP.”

“Furthermore, the Dotsch et al. study used a single target IAT (Bluemke & Friese, 2008; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) as a measure of implicit association strength, in which no reference category is used, instead of a traditional two-category IAT.”

“However, the Single Category-IAT (SC-IAT; Karpinski and Steinman 2006; see also Wigboldus et al. 2004) is an attractive alternative because it has proven to be a reliable and valid measure of implicit social cognition across several domains including soda brand preferences, self esteem, and racial attitudes.”

“Several techniques have been developed to provide more absolute assessments of associations (e.g., Carlston & Skowronski, 1994; De Houwer, 2003; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Nosek & Banaji, 2001).”

“A variant of the Single Category Implicit Association Test (Sc-IAT) [96] will be administered to obtain an implicit measure of associations with the self (selfesteem).”

“First, all SC-IAT reaction times were natural log transformed to correct for skew (Greenwald et al., 1998; Olson & Fazio, 2004).”

“Indeed, the algorithm of IAT-based measures has been in the process of revision since the IAT was developed by Greenwald [16,28,29].”

“The SC-IAT is an adapted version of the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Greenwald et al., 1998), a series of timed categorization tasks.”

“A SingleCategory Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), previously used by Redford and colleagues (2018), measured implicit evaluations of feminists.”

“, 2016) used the SingleCategory IAT (SC-IAT; Karpinski and Steinman, 2006) and another one (Antoniewicz and Brand, 2014) used the Brief IAT (BIAT; Sriram and Greenwald, 2009).”

“Kinderman (1994), for example, used an ‘‘emotion’’ version of the Stroop test (Stroop, 1935) to measure preconscious attentional biases to different word types.”

“and explicit attitudes, will be quantitatively measured using validated tools: (1) the Multidimensional Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale (MSES);(32) (2) the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2 (BREQ-2);(33) (3) the Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale (PNSES);(32) (4) Courneya and Bobick’s…”

“Because of previous criticism about the use of “self” versus general “other” categories in implicit measures (e.g., Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), for the otherrelated category we used a specific stimulus that does not refer to the self.2 LR was described as the initials of an unknown-other…”

“In the broader IAT literature (e.g., using the IAT to assess aspects of social cognition), the SC-IAT provides levels of reliability and validity similar that of the original dual categorization IAT (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”

“When participants with many errors were excluded, only a small and nonsignificant effect (d = 0.24) of faking remained (karpinski & Steinman, 2006). to advance the knowledge on intentional faking through explicit instructions, this study augments past research by not only looking at Iat’s…”

“As predictors, we first assessed individual differences in alcohol-related memory structures using a single category implicit association test (SC-IAT; Bluemke & Friese, 2008; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), a task from the class of implicit measures (Fazio & Olson, 2003; Wittenbrink & Schwarz, 2007).”

“One of these tasks is the Single Target Implicit Association Task (STIAT),[27] which is highly similar to the Single Category Implicit Association Test.”

“This possibility could be explored in future research by using, for example, a single-target IAT (ST-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) to measure implicit motivation and attitudes towards proximity independent from distance.”

“4 ST-IATs are highly similar to the single-category IAT (SC-IAT) introduced by Karpinski and Steinman (2006).”

“Following convention (Greenwald, Nosek, and Banaji 2003), we removed respondents where more than 10% of their trials were less than 300 milliseconds and then converted the remaining 1,543 respondents ’ trust ST-IAT data into D-scores.”

“WEFAT resembles a single-category or single-stimulus word embedding association test, analogous to the single-category implicit association test (sc-IAT) in human cognition [36].”

“We adapted Karpinski and Steinman’s (2006) SC-IAT procedure in order to assess the non-relative implicit attitude toward gambling.”

“It should be noted that several techniques have been developed to provide more absolute assessments of associations (e.g., De Houwer 2003; Karpinski and Steinman 2006; Nosek and Banaji 2001).”

“Besides direct measures, we also assessed a newly developed indirect measure of OE, which could be less distorted by self-presentational biases (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Laferton et al., 2017).”

“In line with the original procedure proposed by Karpinski and Steinman (2006), following each response, participants were given feedback regarding the accuracy of their response.”

“The Disgust Implicit Associations Test (D-IAT) involved an adaptation of the Single Category Implicit Associations Test (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”

“…vs. incompatible) and/or do not utilize response latencies to assess automatic associations (e.g., Affect Misattribution Procedure; Payne, Cheng, Govorun, & Stewart, 2005, Go/No-Go Association Test; Nosek & Banaji, 2001; Single Category Implicit Association Test; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”

“Based on the experimental paradigm of (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), in the absence of suitable experimental materials, we first conducted a pilot study ( N ¼ 67) to determine the positive and negative words to be used in SC-IAT.”

“The procedure for the SC-IAT task followed Karpinski and Steinman (2006).”

“SC-IAT scores were computed on the basis of the scoring algorithm from Karpinski and Steinman (2006).”

“That is, using a single-category Implicit Association Test (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), we found that participants were faster to respond to money and material possession words with the same response key than money and experiential words (with both the material and experiential purchase words derived from each partic…”

“The procedure was almost equivalent to the single-category IAT introduced by Karpinski and Steinman (2006), except that only a single target word was repeatedly shown in the present study, whereas exemplar pictures of a target category were used in the SC IAT. procedure.”

“Single-category IATs (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) are identical to regular IATs except the “Life” concept is omitted and there are 48 trials per condition, rather than 40 as in the regular IAT.”

“…lainnya dari instrumen pengukuran adalah belum ada publikasi yang secara khusus menyampaikan laporan kajian analisa terhadap skala religiusitas apakah sudah bebas bias atau perlu menggunakan instrumen lain untuk memvalidasinya, seperti penggunaan implicit measure (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”

“Although some studies have demonstrated that the implicit test is a reliable measure (e.g., Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), other studies argue that its level of reliability does not represent that needed to indicate satisfactory psychometric properties (e.g., Bosson, Swann Jr., & Pennebaker, 2000;…”

“The Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) was used to measure implicit blind patriotism.”

“We analyzed SC-IAT responses using the D-score algorithm with 400 ms incorrect response penalties as recommended by Karpinski and Steinman (2006).”

“To measure implicit attitudes, the mental health workers completed the Single Category Implicit Attitudes Test (SC-IAT; Karpinski and Steinman, 2006).”

“Therefore, we eliminated the second contrast category such that we could measure evaluative associations with a single category object, namely sex (for more information on the validity of the single category IAT, see Bluemke & Friese, 2008; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”

“…previously validated indicators of automatic partner evaluations and used the Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT; Faure et al., 2018; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) in Study 1, a variation of the Affect Misattribution Procedure (Larson et al., 2022; Payne & Lundberg, 2014) in Study 2,…”

“To examine this, participants were exposed to information related to vanity (vs. control) and completed a single-category implicit association test (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Experiment 3a) or a modi fi ed SC-IAT (Experiment 3b).”

“The single-category SIAT (SC-SIAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) helps to eliminate this ambiguity in the interpretation of implicit SEs by using a single independent category, thus measuring the strength of associations of a single (self) concept with attributes.”

“Karpinski A, Steinman RB (2006) The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition.”

“This measure is also conceptually nearly identical to another recent alternative IAT, the Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT) which has demonstrated reliability and validity as an implicit individual difference measure (Karpinski and Steinman, 2006).”

“Implicit affective associations towards cannabis were assessed with three unipolar Single Category Implicit Association Tests (SC-IATs ; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”

“Because of restrictions of the fi eld setting, we used a smaller number of trials than is usually employed in laboratory research (cf. Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”

“The first of these was a SC-IAT (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) designed to assess the implicit stereotyping of African Americans in terms of the attributes aggressive and athletic.”

“The ST-IAT (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) is a variation of the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998).”

“The SCIAT (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) is a modified version of the IAT that eliminates the need for the second contrast concept to assess the relative association strengths between one single ‘‘concept’’ (i.e., trypophobic features) and two other ‘‘concepts’’ (i.e., danger and safeness).”

“These include the Go/ No-Go Association Task (GNAT; Nosek & Banaji, 2001), the Single-Category IAT (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), and the Single-Target IAT (Wigboldus, Holland, & van Knippenberg, 2004).”

“Beyond the addition of a control measure of salience and/or valence, to probe these possible accounts of the difference in the categories classification a feasible strategy could be the use of a Recoding-Free IAT (RFIAT) [72], a Single Category IAT (SCIAT) [73], or a Single Attribute IAT (SAIAT) [74] for the assessmen…”

“The MSC-IAT was scored according to the improved scoring algorithm (D600) proposed by Greenwald, Nosek, and Banaji (2003), reflecting the mean reaction time difference between two critical blocks (initial combined task vs. reversed combined task) in individual effect size units.”

“Researchers have been working on a variety of alternative IAT designs (e.g., Cohen, Beck, Brown, & Najolia, 2010; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Nosek & Banaji, 2001), but none yet overcome these problems.”