The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition.
Abstract
The Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT) is a modification of the Implicit Association Test that measures the strength of evaluative associations with a single attitude object. Across 3 different attitude domains--soda brand preferences, self-esteem, and racial attitudes--the authors found evidence that the SC-IAT is internally consistent and makes unique contributions in the ability to understand implicit social cognition. In a 4th study, the authors investigated the susceptibility of the SC-IAT to faking or self-presentational concerns. Once participants with high error rates were removed, no significant self-presentation effect was observed. These results provide initial evidence for the reliability and validity of the SC-IAT as an individual difference measure of implicit social cognition.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The reliability of the SC-IAT is comparable to the usual reliability of IAT measurements [17].”
From Explicit and implicit attachment and the outcomes of acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for depression (2020) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cites
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013 · Cited by 1,793
Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept
Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1022 · Cited by 1,393
Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.262 · Cited by 821
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1002/per.465 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327965pli1504_01 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.925 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.61.1.27 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.07.003 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.631 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.760 · DOI
- 10.1006/jesp.1999.1418 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0005-7916(02)00024-1 · DOI
- 10.1026//1618-3169.50.2.77 · DOI
- 10.1006/jesp.1997.1331 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225 · DOI
- 10.1038/nn1203-1241 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.47.6.766 · DOI
- Greenwald, 2001, Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3., Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 85, 10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.85 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0146167203258835 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.774 · DOI
- Kihlstrom, 1990, The psychological unconscious., 445
- 10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_9 · DOI
- Mierke, 2001, Implicit association measurement with the IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes., Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 107, 10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.107 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.19.4.395.20759 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.19.6.625.20886 · DOI
- 10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.101 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0146167204271418 · DOI
- Nunnally, 1978, Psychometric theory.
- 10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1477.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.653 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.139 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.494 · DOI
- 10.1027/1618-3169.51.3.165 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/per.531 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.005 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 939
Exposition sélective aux informations de prévention et attitude implicite envers le tabac
Bardin, B., Perrissol, S., Fos, Y., Py, J., & Dagot, L. (2017) · Psychologie Française · doi:10.1016/j.psfr.2015.07.003 · Cited by 1
Wu, R., & Guo, Q. (2016) · doi:10.4236/psych.2016.77097 · Cited by 1
Zhang, K., & Zhang, D.-J. (2015) · doi:10.3968/7438 · Cited by 1
Lange, R., Bowman, N. D., Banks, J., & Lange, A. (2015) · International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction · doi:10.4018/ijthi.2015070103 · Cited by 1
Implicit Methods for Studying Attitudes: Modern Approach to Research in Social Sciences
Plotka, I., & Blumenau, N. (2015) · doi:10.17770/sie2015vol1.311 · Cited by 1
오, 자. (2015) · The Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology · doi:10.21074/kjlcap.2015.16.2.385 · Cited by 1
On Feeling Torn About One’s Sexuality
Windsor‐Shellard, B., & Haddock, G. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167214539018 · Cited by 6
“Reliability was computed using split-half reliability analysis between odd and even trials (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) and was acceptable (adjusted r = .68).”
MethodImplicit Association Test and Consumer Psychology
Hao, H., & Wang, Y. (2013) · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2013.01865 · Cited by 1
Paradigma: Teste de associação implícita
Oliveira, M., & de Miranda, M. P. (2013) · Laboratório de Psicologia · doi:10.14417/lp.673 · Cited by 1
“Torna-se assim possível identificar a qual das associações compatíveis (e.g., flores e agradável ou armas e desagradável) se deve o efeito IAT geral (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
BackgroundEvaluating Implicit Sentiments for Sinners and Sins: A Cross-Cultural Investigation
Wenger, J. L., Bota, K., & Odera, P. (2012) · doi:10.5539/ijps.v4n2p19 · Cited by 1
“The current experiment utilized a Single-Category IAT patterned after that of Karpinski and Steinman (2006). There were two parts, one that involved evaluating sentiments toward sinful persons and one that involved evaluating sentiments toward sinful behaviors.”
MethodFirst Impression in Mark Evaluation: Predictive Ability of the SC-IAT
Conza, A. D., & Gnisci, A. (2011) · COST 2102 Training School · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34584-5_31 · Cited by 1
Navon, M., Ratliff, K. A., & Corneille, O. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104851 · Cited by 2
Implicit Measures of Personality
Perugini, M., Richetin, J., & Costantini, G. (2020) · Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_817-1 · Cited by 1
Anticipating the Effects of Communication: A Neuroeconomic Framework for Marketing Purposes
Schmidt, S., Wiedmann, K.-P., Reiter, P. J., & Kurlbaum, C. (2018) · Springer Reference Wirtschaft · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-04653-8_5 · Cited by 1
Implizite Messverfahren in der Werbeforschung
Arendt, F. (2016) · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-18916-1_26 · Cited by 1
Nosek, B. A., Bar-Anan, Y., Sriram, N., & Greenwald, A. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2196002 · Cited by 1
“…of seven other implicit measures about the same topics – the IAT, Go/No-go Association Task (GNAT; Nosek & Banaji, 2001), single-target IAT (ST-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), Sorting Paired Features (Bar-Anan, Nosek, & Vianello, 2009), Evaluative Priming (EPT; Fazio et al., 1995), Affect…”
BackgroundWindsor-Shellard, B., & Haddock, G. (2014) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e514472015-480 · Cited by 1
“Reliability was computed using split-half reliability analysis between odd and even trials (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) and was acceptable (adjusted r = .68).”
Mai, R., Hoffmann, S., Lasarov, W., & Buhs, A. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3669-1 · Cited by 86
Brauer, M., van Leeuwen, M., Janssen, E., Newhouse, S. K., Heiman, J. R., & Laan, E. T. M. (2011) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9820-7 · Cited by 54
Food for Boys and Food for Girls: Do Preschool Children Hold Gender Stereotypes about Food?
Graziani, A., Guidetti, M., & Cavazza, N. (2020) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-020-01182-6
“A learning effect was observed on the IAT score, t(132) = 3.12, p = .002, 95% CI [.10, .45], with participants completing the compatible block first showing stronger stereotypes (M = .25, SD = .56) than participants completing the incompatible block first (M = −.03, SD = .45).”
MethodInfluentialGuilt as a signal informing us of a threat to our morality
Furukawa, Y., Nakashima, K., Tsukawaki, R., & Morinaga, Y. (2019) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-019-0144-4 · Cited by 16
The Discrepancy Between How Women See Themselves and Feminists Predicts Identification with Feminism
Meijs, M. H. J., Ratliff, K. A., & Lammers, J. (2017) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0733-8
Gan, Y.-Q., Zheng, W., & Wen, Y. (2014) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-014-0024-0
“The SC-IAT has been shown to be a reliable and valid measure of implicit attitudes (Karpinski and Steinman 2006).”
Backgroundvan Lankveld, J., Pat-El, R., Hebenstreit, H., & Grauvogl, A. (2026) · Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2026.2738713
A Formal Mathematical Examination of Egalitarianism in the Implicit Association Test (IAT)
Wilson, L., Laukenmann, R., & Calanchini, J. (2026) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2026.44.5.555
Consumers' implicit and explicit associations with grass-derived protein for human consumption
Lieke, S.-D., & Mehlhose, C. (2026) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2026.106141
Olfactory Emotion as a Model System for Emotion Measurement
Caricchio, F., Migone, C., Piras, A., Zambito, Y., Pietra, D., Borghini, A., & Fabiano, A. (2026) · Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1027/0269-8803/a000364
Knippenberg, I. A. H., Leontjevas, R., Declercq, I., van Lankveld, J. J. D. M., & Gerritsen, D. L. (2026) · Journal of Affective Disorders Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2026.101172
Implicit-Explicit Incongruence: The Dual Structure of Public Value Preferences in Civil Servants
Gao, X., Ma, H., & Xu, Z. O. U. (2026) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2026.2721472
Marini, M., Salvati, M., & Sbordone, F. L. (2026) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918369.2026.2695664
Cheng, L.-Z., Liu, X.-F., Zhao, Y.-W., & Wu, X. (2026) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.3390/bs16081421
“Larger positive D-scores indicated greater relative compatibility of the beautified-positive/original-negative mapping than of the reversed mapping (Greenwald et al., 2003; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
Liang, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, X., Huang, J., Yan, J., Song, J., & Zhou, Q. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1888203
Filoni, S., Valmori, A., & Donato, S. (2026) · Social Psychology · doi:10.32872/spb.17343
Guo, J., Niu, X., Wu, D., Yang, Y. Y., & Yu, G. (2026) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/14648849261467565
Lee, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1847599
Implicit Bias in Health Professionals: A Scoping Review
Chacón-Acevedo, K., Castillo, A. M. D., Castro-Muñoz, J. A., Rojas, Y. F., Bermudez-Rodriguez, A., & Rojas-Gómez, A. M. (2026) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph23070840
Wang, Q., Li, K.-Y., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Li, L., Hou, Y.-Q., & Jia, F.-L. (2026) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-026-07397-y
Mihaljcic, T., Weingarten, N., & Hartmann, M. (2026) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-02-2025-0242
Kim, H. H., Yoon, H., & Kim, S. H. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1801985
“Unlike the traditional Implicit Association Test (IAT), which assesses relative implicit attitudes between two target categories, the SCIAT measures the implicit attitude toward a single target category (44).”
Implicit association tests for all: Using iatgen for non-English and offline samples
Santos, J. V. D. S., Bú, E. A. D., Hara, T., Mendonça, C., Hagá, S., Pogacar, R., & Kouril, M. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0342742
“Drawing on Greenwald and collaborators’ [1] original work, scholars developed many variations of the IAT tailored to specific purposes, such as the brief IAT [23], the pen-and-paper IAT [24,25], the pre-school IAT [26,27], and the single-category IAT [28].”
When Thinking About Themselves and God, People Believe Truth Matters More Than Control
Nakkawita, E., Heiphetz, L., & Higgins, E. T. (2026) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2026.44.2.193
Susilawati, I. R., Hidayat, R., Lufityanto, G., & Ostovar, S. (2026) · Cogent Psychology · doi:10.1080/23311908.2026.2635159
People think of women as one thing, men as many.
Bailey, A. H., & Leshin, R. (2026) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2026.02.007
Stoll, E., Jakobsen, G., Hörz-Sagstetter, S., Nething, E., & Tomczyk, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1759801
“The internal consistency of the SC-IAT ( H1 ) was assessed calculating the average correlation between the thirds and adjusting the value using the Spearman-Brown correction, resulting in adjusted r (Karpinski and Steinman, 2006; p. 19).”
InfluentialTang, X., Wu, C.-Z., Ma, H.-M., Yao, B., Li, T., & Piao, M.-H. (2026) · Brain Science · doi:10.3390/brainsci16020244
“For incorrect trials, reaction time was replaced by the mean of correct trials in the same block plus 400 ms. D-scores were calculated by subtracting mean compatible trial reaction times from incompatible trial reaction times, divided by the pooled standard deviation of correct trials [13].”
Xiong, H., Hou, Y., Liang, Y.-Y., & Cao, X.-Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1674065
“The Single-Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT; Karpinski and Steinman, 2006) was employed to assess implicit attitudes toward hometown music culture.”
Implicit and Explicit Language Attitudes and Language Attitude Change
McKenzie, R. (2026) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.70033
“…Assessment Procedure (IRAP) and the Affect Misattribution Pro-cedure (AMP) as well as variant forms beyond the audio‐IAT and the conceptual IAT, such as the Single Category IAT (SC‐IAT) and the Personalised IAT (P‐IAT) (see Olson and Fazio 2004; Karpinski and Steinman 2006; Rosseel 2022).”
Motka, F., Tan, H., Levine, S. M., Vollstädt‐Klein, S., Danböck, S. K., Bertsch, K., Winkler, M. H., & Wittekind, C. E. (2025) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.70283
Bean, C., Murray, R. M., Kerwin, S., & Donnelly, M. K. (2025) · Psychology of Sport And Exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.103034
Zagdsuren, B., Barefoot, N. T., Aguiar, E. J., Gable, P. A., Wind, S. A., Richardson, M. T., & MacDonald, H. V. (2025) · Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1249/tjx.0000000000000331
Epifania, O. M., Anselmi, P., & Robusto, E. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1652403
Effects of Owning Gender-Mixed Avatar on Gender Identity and Roles
Kondo, R., & Sugimoto, M. (2025) · 2025 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct) · doi:10.1109/ismar-adjunct68609.2025.00242
“In the experiment, participants first answered the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI)[1, 2] and performed the single category Implicit Association Test (IAT)[4] as a baseline; the BSRI and IAT were performed on a laptop.”
No relationship between gender stereotypes and mental rotation in preschool girls
Ebert, W. M., Jost, L., & Jansen, P. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1650979
Reducing public stigma toward bipolar disorder: I. Interventions and outcomes
Na, J. J., Kim, H. J., & Mikami, A. Y. (2025) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.120083 · Cited by 1
Wei, S., Ma, B., Song, M., Yao, Y., & Meng, N. (2025) · Information Technology and Management · doi:10.1007/s10799-025-00452-7
“Implicit attitudes were measured using the Single Category Implicit Associa - tion Test (SC-IAT) [52].”
The implicit association between masculinity and criminal organizations
Travaglino, G. A., & Marini, M. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-03984-8
“To examine the association between masculinity and criminal organizations, in this research, we employed a variant of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) 46,47 , specifically the Single Category IAT (SC-IAT) 48 .”
Scherzer, C. R., Sullivan, J. M., & Buckner, J. D. (2025) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.1080/10826084.2025.2495781
“Future work could focus on using IATs which remove the interference of the “other”, such as a single target IAT (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
The Growth Mindset of Beauty Promotes Risk-Taking Propensity and Behavior
Faust, N. T., & Hung, I. W. (2025) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672251327605
“This D-core algorithm is calculated by Inquisit, which does not included data from the practice trials (blocks 1 and 3) and excluded responses less than 350 ms (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
Andreychik, M. R., & Fuchs, S. C. (2025) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672251328064
“In particular, we will examine whether people can predict their performance on an Evaluative Priming Task (EPT; Fazio et al., 1986; Study 1), and on a Single Category Implicit Association Test (SCIAT; e.g., Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Studies 2a, 2b, and 3).”
Me, myself, and my stereotypes: does retraining gender stereotypes change men’s self-concept?
Block, K., & Schmader, T. (2025) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2025.2477003 · Cited by 3
“Data from 40 participants were excluded due to computer error ( n = 1), experimenter error ( n = 4), or IAT error rates exceeding 20% on at least one of the three IATs (Greenwald & Farnham, 2000; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006, n = 34), resulting in a final sample of 188 (92 men, 96 women).”
Acute psychological stress promotes implicit aggression: Evidence from behavior and ERPs
Zhang, Y., Chen, X., Jia, Y., Duan, Y., Liu, M., Xu, Q., Jia, L., & Wu, L. (2025) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-025-01276-2
“The Single Target Implicit Association Test (ST-IAT) task was employed to measure the automatic association between the self and aggression (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
Record, J. M., & Thompson, A. E. (2024) · Sexuality and Disability · doi:10.1007/s11195-024-09879-2
“…the Single-Target IAT (ST-IAT) would more readily compute the specific valence of attitudes by solely including photos of mixed-sex couples with DS [68], future studies should incorporate the ST-IAT as part of their methodology to examine the valence of attitudes toward mixed-sex couples with DS…”
Gorlin, E. I., Huong, C., Warren, C., Weissman, S., Langevin, M., Durso, J., Johnson, R. T., Mikula, C. M., Gaugler, T. L., & Wenze, S. J. (2024) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.2024.2433289 · Cited by 1
“The Self-Honesty Implicit Association Task (SH-IAT) developed for this study is an adapted version of the Single-Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
Me? A criminal? Relationships with offenders and implicit criminal associations
Saad, M. K. (2024) · Criminology & Criminal Justice · doi:10.1177/17488958241288061
“In accordance with the procedures outlined by Greenwald et al. (2003) and Karpinski and Steinman (2006), SC-IAT scores are standardized reaction times between self and criminal trials and other and criminal trials.”
InfluentialImpact of attention cues on empathy for pain in college students with implicit weight stigma
Chen, H. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-024-06451-1
Calà, F., Tarchi, P., Frassineti, L., Gursesli, M. C., Guazzini, A., & Lanatà, A. (2024) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · doi:10.1109/embc53108.2024.10781635
“Implicit attitudes towards climate change were assessed with a Single-Category Implicit Association Test that was designed according to [2].”
In the I of the beholder: an attempt to capture the implicit self-concept regarding psychopathy
Krüppel, J., Yoon, D., Zerres, K., Brunner, F., & Mokros, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1346029
“Although IAT-measures mostly used words to represent the different categories, some studies combined words and pictures (e.g., Karpinski and Steinman, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSambol, S., Dadswell, K., Cook, S., & Ball, M. (2024) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104294
Dress Code in Chinese High Schools: A Preliminary Design towards its Sociological Impacts
Zhu, L.-B. (2024) · Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.54097/cm8zzk44
“According to Karpinski and Steinman's (2006) single-category IAT template, this test should be divided into two halves, so subjects will receive two trials [9].”
MethodVeysey, B., & Rivera, L. M. (2024) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/00938548231225256
“The SC-IAT was scored in accordance with past procedures (Greenwald et al., 2003; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), including the fact that participants are required to correctly categorize at least 80% of the IAT stimuli (i.e., participants are required to attend carefully and not to respond randomly).”
Bao, Y., Wang, W., Zhao, Y., Yu, D., Njoroge, W., & Chen, B. (2023) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.2758
Prejudice among egalitarians: The case of values and weight bias
Souchon, N., Hanel, P., Coutté, A., & Maio, G. (2023) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2984
Implicit Criminal Associations: The Consequences of a Criminal Justice Education
Saad, M. K. (2023) · Journal of Criminal Justice Education · doi:10.1080/10511253.2023.2220781
“The semantic stimuli used in the SC-IAT represent self, other, and criminal.”
InfluentialBlackwell, S. E., Wilhelm, F. H., Reinecke, A., Margraf, J., & Woud, M. L. (2023) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-023-10384-7 · Cited by 1
Werntz, A. J., O’Shea, B. A., Sjobeck, G., Howell, J. L., Lindgren, K. P., & Teachman, B. A. (2023) · Anxiety Stress & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615806.2023.2176486
Abdelaziz, B., & Ikrame, M. (2022) · Innovative Marketing · doi:10.21511/im.18(3).2022.18
“To calculate the SC-IAT scores, the reference procedure of Karpinski and Steinman (2006) was followed: After a response time of 350 ms, the stimulus disappears from the screen, and responses exceeding this time are not considered.”
Development and Validation of Implicit Measures for Organizational Climate
Meyer, K. (2022) · Journal of Organizational Psychology · doi:10.33423/jop.v22i1.5016
“Consequently, many studies have explored the association or disassociation between implicit and explicit measures (Lane et al., 2007). Ziegert and Hanges (2005) explored and attempted to replicate findings from Brief and colleagues (2000) about the role of implicit attitudes in a climate for racial bias.”
BackgroundInfluentialÖrtük Benlik Saygısı: Doğası, Değerlendirilmesi ve Psikopatolojilerdeki Rolü
İMAMOĞLU, A. H., & Bi̇lge, Y. (2021) · Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar - Current Approaches in Psychiatry · doi:10.18863/pgy.800464 · Cited by 1
Epifania, O. M., Anselmi, P., & Robusto, E. (2021) · doi:10.31124/advance.16592579.v1
“The Implicit Association Test (Greenwald et al., 1998), the Single Category IAT (SC-IAT Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), and the Go/No-go Association Task (GNAT; Nosek & Banaji, 2001) are based on automatic associations.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBries, F. S. M., Ngina, K. M. C., & Bonsol-Marasigan, J. (2021) · Mountain Journal of Science and Interdisciplinary Research (formerly Benguet State University Research Journal) · doi:10.70884/mjsir.v81i1.280
“…where participants committed errors (as is the typical practice in IAT analysis), the trials themselves are retained while their latencies are replaced by the subject’s mean latency across all test trials with an additional 400ms penalty (similar to the procedure by Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
Milius, A., van Delft, I., Finkenauer, C., & Pronk, T. (2020) · Kind en adolescent · doi:10.1007/s12453-020-00248-2
Maltagliati, S., Sarrazin, P., Isoard-Gautheur, S., Rhodes, R., Boisgontier, M., & Cheval, B. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-70750/v1
“…study assessed automatic affective attitudes toward sedentary behaviors (Chevance et al., 2017), using the Single Category Implicit Association Test, a reaction time-based task (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Rebar et al., 2015), but did not observed association with time spent in sedentary behaviors.”
MethodSallis, H., Smith, G. D., & Munafo, M. R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.024 · Cited by 1
Weiss, A., & Deary, I. (2020) · The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology · doi:10.4135/9781446215159.n847
Social Relations and Social Support
Austin, E. Q., Knack, J. M., Jensen‐Campbell, L. A., & Rex‐Lear, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.036
Models of Personality Structure
Raad, B. D., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.012 · Cited by 4
Personality Assessment Methods
Boyle, G. J., & Helmes, E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.011 · Cited by 1
Schermer, J. A., & Saklofske, D. H. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.014
Narrative Identity in the Social World
McLean, K. C., Syed, M., Haraldsson, K. G., & Lowe, L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.035 · Cited by 2
Personality in Nonhuman Animals
Bell, A. M., & Bensky, M. K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.023 · Cited by 1
Corr, P. J., & Matthews, G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.002
Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N. R., & Moscoso, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.040 · Cited by 4
Lynam, D. R., Vize, C. E., & Miller, J. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.043 · Cited by 2
Actitudes implícitas en Psicología Ambiental. Una revisión de literatura
Tosi, J., Ledesma, R., Kuhnen, A., & Felippe, M. L. (2020) · Estudos de Psicologia (Natal) · doi:10.22491/1678-4669.20190030
“Es importante destacar que, a diferencia del IAT y el BIAT, el SC-IAT permite obtener un resultado “absoluto” (i.e. asociaciones implícitas entre los atributos y una sola categoría target) en vez de “relativo” (i.e. asociaciones implícitas entre los atributos y dos o cuatro categorías target).”
BackgroundInfluentialA-Tjak, J., Morina, N., Boendermaker, W., Topper, M., & Emmelkamp, P. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.2.12534/v2
“Both the sequence of the SC-IATs and the place where the target label first appeared were counterbalanced, to counter sequence effects (26).”
InfluentialImplicit Attitudes towards Humanistic and Natural Wisdom Among College Students
Chen, H.-B., & Dong, H.-Y. (2019) · DEStech Transactions on Economics Business and Management · doi:10.12783/dtem/icaem2019/30967
“Attribute words in SC-IAT were wise descriptors which were wisdom exemplars, wise person, the sage, the wise, wise man, and wise people.”
MethodInfluentialWiesner, M., Petrow, A., & Vajna, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the Design Society · doi:10.1017/dsi.2019.251
“The Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT) (Karpinski and Steinman, 2006) (Greenwald et al., 1998) and the Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP) (Payne et al., 2005) have proved to be applicable implicit preference acquisition methods in own preliminary work (Wiesner and Vajna, 2018).”
MethodBody ownership illusions in humans and other animals
WADA, M. (2019) · Japanese Journal of Animal Psychology · doi:10.2502/janip.69.1.2
“…& Ramachandran, 2003)。 一方,ラバーハンドと実験参加者の手への刺激を 同期させずに行なうと,錯覚が減弱する(非同期条 件)。特に,両刺激の時間的なずれが300ミリ秒を越 えると,錯覚が大きく減弱する(Shimada, Fukuda, & Hiraki, 2009)。つまり,RHI は実験参加者の手 に対する触覚刺激と,ラバーハンドに対する筆の動 きという視覚刺激が,同期して入力したことによっ て生じる感覚統合によって起こると考えられる。な お,一般に視覚刺激と触覚刺激は,30ミリ秒程度の 時間差があれば,その順序を識別可能である(Spence,…”
Children’s explicit and implicit school satisfactions
Cordonier, L. (2019) · Revue européenne des sciences sociales · doi:10.4000/ress.5272
“I used the SC-IAT-P because it measures individuals’ attitude toward a single target concept—“school”, in the present case—, whereas other IAT versions require the opposition of two target concepts (Karpinski and Steinman, 2006).”
MethodKeech, J. J., & Hamilton, K. (2018) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6439-6_102001-1
Metadata
- Authors
- Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Temple University (US)
- ORCID
- Karpinski, Andrew
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-32
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W1998043162
- Cited by
- 1,108
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 57
- FWCI
- 107.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- Single Category Implicit Association Test, Implicit Association Test, implicit social cognition, evaluative associations, attitude measurement, self-esteem, racial attitudes, self-presentation, faking, reliability statistics, validity, individual differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Association Learning, Attitude, Awareness, Choice Behavior, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Individuality, Internal-External Control, Male, Personality Inventory, Prejudice, Psychometrics, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Students, Reproducibility of Results, Black People, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review