The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition.
Abstract
The Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT) is a modification of the Implicit Association Test that measures the strength of evaluative associations with a single attitude object. Across 3 different attitude domains--soda brand preferences, self-esteem, and racial attitudes--the authors found evidence that the SC-IAT is internally consistent and makes unique contributions in the ability to understand implicit social cognition. In a 4th study, the authors investigated the susceptibility of the SC-IAT to faking or self-presentational concerns. Once participants with high error rates were removed, no significant self-presentation effect was observed. These results provide initial evidence for the reliability and validity of the SC-IAT as an individual difference measure of implicit social cognition.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The reliability of the SC-IAT is comparable to the usual reliability of IAT measurements [17].”
From Explicit and implicit attachment and the outcomes of acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for depression (2020) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cites
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013 · Cited by 1,793
Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept
Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1022 · Cited by 1,393
Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.262 · Cited by 821
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1002/per.465 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327965pli1504_01 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.925 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.61.1.27 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.07.003 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.631 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.760 · DOI
- 10.1006/jesp.1999.1418 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0005-7916(02)00024-1 · DOI
- 10.1026//1618-3169.50.2.77 · DOI
- 10.1006/jesp.1997.1331 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225 · DOI
- 10.1038/nn1203-1241 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.47.6.766 · DOI
- Greenwald, 2001, Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3., Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 85, 10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.85 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0146167203258835 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.774 · DOI
- Kihlstrom, 1990, The psychological unconscious., 445
- 10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_9 · DOI
- Mierke, 2001, Implicit association measurement with the IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes., Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 107, 10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.107 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.19.4.395.20759 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.19.6.625.20886 · DOI
- 10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.101 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0146167204271418 · DOI
- Nunnally, 1978, Psychometric theory.
- 10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1477.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.653 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.139 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.494 · DOI
- 10.1027/1618-3169.51.3.165 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/per.531 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.005 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 939
When Temporal Contiguity Matters
Richetin, J., & Perugini, M. (2008) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759.24.4.246 · Cited by 11
“The SC-IAT was constructed following the conventional procedure implemented by Karpinski and Steinman (2006) .”
BackgroundMethodMeasures of Implicit Cognition for Marketing Research
Teichert, T., Graf, A., Rezaei, S., Wörfel, P., & Duh, H. I. (2019) · Marketing ZFP · doi:10.15358/0344-1369-2019-3-48 · Cited by 16
“Forehand and Perkins (2005) demonstrate that consumers consciously 58 MARKETING · ZFP · Volume 41 · 3/2019 · p. 48–76 Procedure Mechanism RecodingFree Single Object Multiple Objects Affective Priming Priming X X Affect Misattribution Procedure Priming X X Brief IAT Categorization Extrinsic Affective Simon Task Simon E…”
MethodNegative Attitudes to Lesbians and Gay Men: Persecutors and Victims
Lingiardi, V., & Nardelli, N. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06787-2_3 · Cited by 16
“The Single Category IAT (SC-IAT) [20] was developed to meet this need.”
MethodExplicit and Implicit Attitudes to Food
Czyżewska, M., Graham, R., & Ceballos, N. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-92271-3_45 · Cited by 16
The Misandry Myth: An Inaccurate Stereotype About Feminists’ Attitudes Toward Men
Hopkins-Doyle, A., Petterson, A., Leach, S., Zibell, H., Chobthamkit, P., Rahim, S. B. A., Blake, J., Bosco, C., Cherrie-Rees, K., Beadle, A., et al. (2023) · Psychology of women quarterly · doi:10.1177/03616843231202708 · Cited by 15
“Participants completed the SC-IAT (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), which measures evaluative associations with a single category or attitude object.”
MethodInfluentialAssessing the Impact of Music Recommendation Diversity on Listeners: A Longitudinal Study
Porcaro, L., Gómez, E., & Castillo, C. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems · doi:10.1145/3608487 · Cited by 40
“Therefore, we hypothesize that most of the genres shown in the SC-IAT test were only labels to the study participants and remained as such, given that no mechanism of bounding was incentivized.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialIs Difficulty Mostly About Impossibility? What Difficulty Implies May Be Culturally Variant
O’Donnell, S. C., Yan, V. X., Bi, C., & Oyserman, D. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672211065595 · Cited by 24
“In each study, we followed Karpinski and Steinman (2006), eliminating (a) nonresponses, (b) too fast (<350 ms) and too slow (>10,000 ms) responses, (c) and data from error-prone participants whose overall sorting accuracy was 75% (Supplemental Table S1 details these exclusions).”
Methodvan Wijk-Herbrink, M. F., Lobbestael, J., Bernstein, D., Broers, N., Roelofs, J., & Arntz, A. (2020) · International Journal of Forensic Mental Health · doi:10.1080/14999013.2020.1842562 · Cited by 15
“Several studies have found evidence for the reliability and validity of the ST-IAT (Bar-Anan & Nosek, 2014; Bluemke & Friese, 2008; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
Haynes, A., Kemps, E., & Moffitt, R. L. (2016) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.07.004 · Cited by 15
“A recoding-free variant of a single category implicit association test (SC-IAT-RF) (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Rothermund, Teige-Mocigemba, Gast, & Wentura, 2009) programmed and run using Presentation (Neurobehavioural Systems) was used to assess implicit evaluations of unhealthy snack foods.”
MethodInfluentialSala, M., Baldwin, A. S., & Williams, D. M. (2016) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.07.005 · Cited by 18
Deng, X., Ding, X., Cheng, C., & Chow, H. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01692 · Cited by 19
Critcher, C. R., & Ferguson, M. J. (2016) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000053 · Cited by 20
“This message would remain on the screen for 2,000 ms. Matching Karpinski and Steinman (2006), if participants failed to respond within 1,500 ms, the target word disappeared, and the message “TOO SLOW!!!” would follow on screen for 2,000 ms.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAssessing hypothetical bias: An analysis beyond the mean of functional food
Furno, M., Verneau, F., & Sannino, G. (2016) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.12.012 · Cited by 15
Dissociation between implicit and explicit expectancies of cannabis use in adolescence
Schmits, É., Maurage, P., Thirion, R., & Quertemont, É. (2015) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2015.11.005 · Cited by 18
Wolff, W., Schindler, S., & Brand, R. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118507 · Cited by 15
“The Single Category IAT (SC-IAT) for instance, an IAT variant with only one target and no comparison concepts [29], has been found to be more prone to faking than standard IAT’s [10].”
MethodLet their Fingers do the Talking? Using the Implicit Association Test in Market Research
Gregg, A. P., Klymowsky, J., Owens, D., & Perryman, A. L. (2013) · International Journal of Market Research · doi:10.2501/ijmr-2013-013 · Cited by 16
“Perhaps the leading variant is the Single-Category IAT (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman 2006; Bluemke & Friese 2008) .”
BackgroundCognitive mechanisms underlying implicit negative self concept in dysphoria.
Sheppes, G., Meiran, N., Gilboa-Schechtman, E., & Shahar, G. (2008) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.8.3.386 · Cited by 15
Interfering implicit attitudes of adopting recycled products from construction wastes
Ding, Z., Yang, Q., Zhang, Z., & Chen, J. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142775 · Cited by 16
Schmitz, E. A., Jansen, B. R. J., Wiers, R. W. H. J., & Salemink, E. (2023) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-023-10390-9 · Cited by 21
“The Single-Target Implicit Association Test (ST-IAT; cf. Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) was used to assess the strength of associations between math and failure , in comparison to math and success .”
MethodCosta, S., Pirchio, S., Shevchuk, A., & Glock, S. (2023) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2023.101757 · Cited by 21
Aidy, C. L., Steele, J. R., Williams, A., Lipman, C., Wong, O. C. Y., & Mastragostino, E. (2021) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.09.010 · Cited by 16
The good and the bad: Are some attribute words better than others in the Implicit Association Test?
Axt, J., Feng, T. Y., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2021) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01592-8 · Cited by 14
Serra, W., Chatard, A., Tello, N., Harika-Germaneau, G., Noël, X., & Jaafari, N. (2019) · Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/pha0000266 · Cited by 14
Dentale, F., Vecchione, M., Ghezzi, V., & Barbaranelli, C. (2016) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000378 · Cited by 17
“Other studies should be conducted to confirm the results and generalize them to other IAT variants (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), and to experimental paradigms based on different mechanisms (e.g., the Affect Misattribution Procedure; Payne, Cheng, Govorun, & Stewart, 2005).”
ResultRichard, A., Meule, A., & Blechert, J. (2018) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.01.018 · Cited by 14
Drake, C., Codd, R., & Terry, C. (2018) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.03.005 · Cited by 14
Explaining Inconsistencies in Implicit and Explicit Attitudes towards Domestic and Foreign Products
Tseng, T.-H., Balabanis, G., & Liu, M. (2018) · International Marketing Review · doi:10.1108/imr-05-2013-0092 · Cited by 14
Warschburger, P., Gmeiner, M., Morawietz, M., & Rinck, M. (2017) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980017002701 · Cited by 14
“Implicit association test To measure implicit associations with snacks, participants completed a modified version of the single category picture IAT given by Karpinski and Steinman((28)) before and after the training.”
BackgroundMethodMaas, J., Woud, M., Keijsers, G., Rinck, M., Becker, E., & Wiers, R. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychopathology · doi:10.5127/jep.052415 · Cited by 14
“We assessed both approach-avoidance action tendencies (pictorial Approach-Avoidance Task; Rinck & Becker, 2007) and approach-avoidance associations (verbal Single-Target IAT [ST-IAT]; Wigboldus, Holland, & Van Knippenberg, 2005; cf. Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
MethodAssessing Sexual Interest in Children Using the Go/No-Go Association Test
Bartels, R. M., Beech, A., Harkins, L., & Thornton, D. (2017) · Sexual abuse. A Journal of Research and Treatment · doi:10.1177/1079063216686119 · Cited by 14
The Effect of Men's Body Attitudes and Motivation for Gym Attendance
Caudwell, K. M., & Keatley, D. A. (2016) · The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000001344 · Cited by 27
“The order of presentation of the measures was randomized, such that participants received either the IAT before or after the questionnaires.”
BackgroundInfluentialHaynes, A., Kemps, E., Moffitt, R. L., & Mohr, P. B. (2014) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2014.984713 · Cited by 13
Bardin, B., Perrissol, S., Py, J., Launay, C., & Escoubès, F. (2014) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/18.07.pr0.115c10z8 · Cited by 14
“To compute the reliability of both tests, the procedure of Karpinski and Steinman (2006 ) was used.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPetróczi, A. (2013) · Performance Enhancement & Health · doi:10.1016/j.peh.2014.08.003 · Cited by 18
van Quaquebeke, N., & Schmerling, A. (2010) · Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O · doi:10.1026/0932-4089/a000020 · Cited by 14
Genetic Influences on Implicit Measures of Personality
Osinsky, R., Alexander, N., Schmitz, A., Kuepper, Y., Müller, E. A., Beer, L., Koeppe, L., & Hennig, J. (2010) · Journal of Individual Differences · doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000007 · Cited by 11
Petersen, S., & Ritz, T. (2009) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1348/135910709x466676 · Cited by 15
A-Tjak, J. G. L., Morina, N., Boendermaker, W. J., Topper, M., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02547-7 · Cited by 13
“The two types of SC-IATs used in this study related to relational self-esteem and relational anxiety were based on Dewitte and colleagues (16).”
MethodInfluentialRhodes, R. E., Rebar, A. L., & Strachan, S. M. (2025) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102923 · Cited by 14
Seewald, A., Teige‐Mocigemba, S., & Rief, W. (2023) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-023-10413-5 · Cited by 14
“The internal consistency in SC-IATs is usually smaller than in IATs (average of α = 0.80; Greenwald et al., 2021) and self-reports but higher than in other indirect measurements such as evaluative priming (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAxt, J., Buttrick, N. R., & Feng, R.-Y. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672221150229 · Cited by 13
“For one, the IAT has produced several variants, such as the Brief IAT (BIAT; Sriram & Greenwald, 2009) or Single-Category IAT (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
MethodMachulska, A., Kleinke, K., & Klucken, T. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01804-9 · Cited by 13
“Regarding the IAT, overall satisfactory and/or good internal consistencies have been reported, with split-half correlations and Cronbach’s alpha ranging between 0.60 and 0.90 (Cunningham et al., 2001; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Nosek, 2005, Nosek et al., 2007).”
MethodInfluentialDahl, R. A., Vakkalanka, J. P., Harland, K. K., & Radke, J. B. (2022) · Journal of Addiction Medicine · doi:10.1097/adm.0000000000000970 · Cited by 23
“other latency measures, such as: to evaluate how PWUD identify self-identity and self-schema to better understand the seemingly paradoxical use of substances known to be self-harming(18,19); to investigate implicit associations with respect to the intersectionality of race, gender, and PWID(20) and to explore how heal…”
BackgroundInfluentialMaltagliati, S., Sarrazin, P. G., Isoard‐Gautheur, S., Rhodes, R. E., Boisgontier, M. P., & Cheval, B. (2021) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.2021.1877246 · Cited by 16
“In line with the idea than an increase in energy expenditure may be subsequently compensated by the engagement in sedentary behaviors (Melanson, 2017), previous work revealed that greater time spent at work were associated with higher leisure-time sedentary behaviors (e.g., Stamatakis et al., 2014).”
ResultLi, M., Wen, B., & Hsieh, C. (2021) · International Public Management Journal · doi:10.1080/10967494.2021.1963891 · Cited by 16
“The measurement for the IPSM, adapted from Karpinski and Steinman (2006) SC-IAT, quantifies the strength of evaluative associations between concepts.”
MethodThe mechanism of filler items in the response time concealed information test
Lukács, G., & Ulrich Ansorge, A. (2021) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-020-01432-y · Cited by 17
The implicit sensory association test (ISAT): A measurement approach for sensory perception
Haase, J., & Wiedmann, K.-P. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.005 · Cited by 13
van Lankveld, J. J. D. M., Wolfs, K., & Grauvogl, A. (2018) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2018.1542656 · Cited by 16
On implicit racial prejudice against infants
Wolf, L. J., Maio, G. R., Karremans, J. C., & Leygue, C. (2016) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430216629812 · Cited by 12
“In this regard, it is interesting that, similar to other studies of implicit prejudice (e.g., Karpinski & Steinman, 2006), the preference for White Europeans over South Asians was driven by spontaneous in-group favorability, whereas the spontaneous attitude toward the out-group was neutral.”
ResultDevelopment and initial validation of an indirect measure of transformational leadership integrity
Mills, J. P., & Boardley, I. D. (2017) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.05.005 · Cited by 17
“Fortunately, instruments have come to the forefront in recent years (Fazio, Jackson, Dunton, & Williams, 1995; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Rothermund, Teige-Mocigemba, Gast, & Wentura, 2009; Teige-Mocigemba, Klauer, & Rothermund, 2008) that negate the problem of…”
De l’attitude implicite et de sa mesure : fondements et pratiques en comportement du consommateur
Ackermann, C.-L., & Mathieu, J. (2015) · Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition) · doi:10.1177/0767370114565074 · Cited by 18
Courbet, D., & Fourquet-Courbet, M.-P. (2014) · doi:10.15344/2349-2635/2014/103 · Cited by 13
“Recently, Karpinski and Steinman [114] have proposed the single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition.”
Investigating the operation of the affect heuristic: is it an associative construct?
Townsend, E., Spence, A., & Knowles, S. E. (2014) · doi:10.1080/13669877.2013.808687 · Cited by 13
McKay, R. T., Arciuli, J., Atkinson, A., Bennett, E., & Pheils, E. (2010) · Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.05.004 · Cited by 13
“…pleasant relative to the strength of the association between other and unpleasant) rather than the absolute strengths of single associations (i.e. it cannot measure only evaluative associations with the self with no complementary category; Greenwald and Farnham, 2000; Karpinski and Steinman, 2006).”
BackgroundMeasuring automatic value orientations: The Achievement–Benevolence Implicit Association Test
Dentale, F., Vecchione, M., Gebauer, J. E., & Barbaranelli, C. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12229 · Cited by 13
How do Emotions and Feelings Regulate Physical Activity
Jekauc, D., & Brand, R. (2017) · doi:10.3389/978-2-88945-271-2 · Cited by 13
Effect of mortality salience on implicit ageism: Implication of age stereotypes and sex
Boudjemadi, V., & Gana, K. (2012) · European Review of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.erap.2011.11.002 · Cited by 13
An integrated dual process model in predicting e‐cigarette use in undergraduate students
Phipps, D. J., Nott, N. J., & Hamilton, K. (2024) · Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1111/aphw.12592 · Cited by 14
Kanamori, Y., Harrell-Williams, L. M., Xu, Y., & Ovrebo, E. (2020) · doi:10.1037/sgd0000343 · Cited by 12
Implicit social cognition through years: The Implicit Association Test at age 21Preprint
Epifania, O., Robusto, E., & Anselmi, P. (2020) · doi:10.31124/advance.11914416.v1 · Cited by 12
“Despite some small differences in their procedures (e.g., the presence of a response time window), the terms Single Category IAT (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) and Single Target IAT (ST-IAT; Wigboldus, Holland, & van Knippenberg, 2004) are used interchangeably to indicate the same measure…”
MethodCan Imagination Reduce Prejudice Over Time? A Preregistered Test of the Imagined Contact Hypothesis
Schuhl, J., Lambert, E. G., & Chatard, A. (2019) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2019.1579719 · Cited by 22
“We used a single IAT (Bluemke & Friese, 2008; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) to measure the strength of participants’ mental associations of the concept of schizophrenia with negative and positive words.”
MethodAckermann, C.-L., Teichert, T., & Truong, Y. (2018) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2018.1515102 · Cited by 12
“We followed the reference procedure for the calculation of SC-IAT scores (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006): outcomes of individuals with an error rate greater than 20% were excluded from analysis; latencies below 350 ms were not taken into account, and error latencies were replaced with block means plus an error penalty of…”
MethodInfluentialDegner, J., Essien, I., & Reichardt, R. (2016) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2234 · Cited by 12
Attitude and key word signing usage in support staff.
Rombouts, E., Maes, B., & Zink, I. (2016) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2016.03.016 · Cited by 12
Multisensory stimulation with other-race faces and the reduction of racial prejudice
Estudillo, A. J., & Bindemann, M. (2016) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2016.04.006 · Cited by 12
“…for the single category IAT is calculated by subtracting the average response times when other-race faces shared the same key with negative words from the average response times when other-race faces shared the same key with positive words (for further details, see Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialDrake, C., Kramer, S. L., Habib, R., Schuler, K., Blankenship, L., & Locke, J. (2015) · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2015.04.004 · Cited by 12
Seeing the Unexpected: Counterstereotypes are Implicitly Bad
Flannigan, N., Miles, L., Quadflieg, S., & Macrae, C. N. (2013) · doi:10.1521/soco.2013.31.6.712 · Cited by 12
“The words were taken from Karpinski and Steinman (2006), and the occupational stimuli were modified from Quadflieg et al.”
MethodOstafin, B. D., & Palfai, T. P. (2012) · Addiction Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1186/1940-0640-7-25 · Cited by 14
“There is evidence that the IAT used in this study is more reflective of approach motivation toward alcohol rather than avoidance motivation away from alcohol [31], but future research would benefit from using implicit measures such as the single-category IAT [50] to examine the independent contributions of approach an…”
MethodStieger, S., Göritz, A., & Voracek, M. (2011) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0052 · Cited by 12
“Furthermore, in a between-subject design, participants were asked to take part in one of two randomly assigned implicit association tests (i.e., either an Implicit Association Test [IAT] on anxiety 12,13 or two shorter Single Category Implicit Association Tests [SC-IAT] on anxiety and calmness 14 ).”
Callan, M. J., Kay, A. C., Olson, J. M., Brar, N., & Whitefield, N. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.005 · Cited by 12
On the Death of Implicit Association Tests (IATs)
Röhner, J., & Iliescu, D. (2023) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000778 · Cited by 16
González-Sanguino, C., Castellanos, M. A., González-Domínguez, S., & Muñoz, M. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01930-1 · Cited by 11
“…the previously mentioned studies on the implicit assessment of internalized stigma (Rüsch, Corrigan, et al., 2010; von Hippel et al., 2018), a simplified version of the original IAT (Greenwald et al., 1998), the Single Category-IAT (SC-IAT) (Karpinski and Steinman, 2006), was developed in Spanish.”
Backgroundvan Alebeek, H., Kahveci, S., & Blechert, J. (2021) · Open Research Europe · doi:10.12688/openreseurope.13241.1 · Cited by 11
“…0267, 0282, 0283, 0226, 0317, 0325, 0361, 0366, 0380, 0394, 0396, 0397, 0399, 0424, 0439, 0438, 0467, 0510, 0515, 0539, 0654, 0682, 0715, 0742, 0759, 0811, 0800, 0809, 0818, 0819, 0840, 0860, 0874, 0880. two stimulus categories on one side and one on the other side (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
Egerton, G. A., Colder, C., & Lee, Y. (2021) · Addictive Behaviours · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106902 · Cited by 11
Rosa, A. O. L., Villacampa, J., Corradi, G. B., & Ingram, G. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01452-w · Cited by 14
Qiu, Y., & Zhang, G. (2020) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2020.101660 · Cited by 16
The Five-Factor Model of Personality: Consensus and Controversy
McCrae, R. R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.013 · Cited by 20
Velkoff, E. A., & Smith, A. R. (2020) · Body image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.05.005 · Cited by 11
Muschalik, C., Crutzen, R., Candel, M. J. J. M., Elfeddali, I., & de Vries, H. (2020) · Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1080/21642850.2020.1730843 · Cited by 12
“In the first part of the study, we assessed participants’ implicit attitudes towards red meat by means of a modified version of the Single-Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT) (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006).”
MethodInfluentialThe role of implicit sexual desire in romantic relationships
de Jong, D. C., Reis, H., Peters, B. J., DeHaan, C. R., & Birnbaum, G. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.042 · Cited by 11
Do implicitly measured math-anxiety associations play a role in math behavior?
Schmitz, E. A., Jansen, B. R. J., Wiers, R., & Salemink, E. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2019.05.013 · Cited by 11
“This allows for a direct and independent comparison of anxiety associations between different targets (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Wigboldus et al., 2004).”
InfluentialExamining attitudes toward bicycle-share program use: A dual-process theory approach
Chen, L.-H., & Chancellor, H. (2019) · Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.03.007 · Cited by 11
How becoming a mother shapes implicit and explicit responses to infant cues
Senese, V. P., Miranda, M. C., de Falco, S., Venuti, P., & Bornstein, M. H. (2018) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.21772 · Cited by 17
Peeters, M., Koning, I., Monshouwer, K., Vollebergh, W., & Wiers, R. (2016) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.15288/jsad.2016.77.749 · Cited by 11
Keough, M. T., O’Connor, R. M., & Colder, C. R. (2016) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.13036 · Cited by 18
“An adapted SC-IAT (Karpinski and Steinman, 2006; O’Connor et al., 2012) was used to assess implicit alcohol cognitions at baseline and post-TSST.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialManns‐James, L. (2015) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12626 · Cited by 11
“A modification of the original method, the single-target or single-category IAT, has been validated in several studies to assess attitudes for or against a single concept (Karpinski & Steinman 2006, Penke et al. 2006, Bluemke & Friese 2008).”
Methodten Hoor, G. T., Ruiter, R., van Bergen, J., Hoebe, C., Houben, K., & Kok, G. (2013) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-1091 · Cited by 11
Freng, S., & Kehn, A. (2013) · Psychiatry Psychology and Law · doi:10.1080/13218719.2012.735885 · Cited by 11
“For situations that fail to meet this requirement, it is possible that adapting other indirect techniques such as the Go/No Go Association Task (GNAT, Nosek & Banaji, 2001) or the single category IAT (SCIAT, Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) may provide useful alternatives.”
MethodImplicit attitudes and digital piracy
Taylor, S. A. (2012) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/17505931211282409 · Cited by 10
Motives and health-related behaviour: Incremental prediction by implicit motives
Aspden, T., Ingledew, D., & Parkinson, J. (2012) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2010.541911 · Cited by 11
“Therefore, we used the Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006 ).”
MethodPossible Implicit Mechanisms of Minority Representation
Craemer, T. (2010) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00785.x · Cited by 11
Sobczak, A., & Bunzeck, N. (2023) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-023-00178-7 · Cited by 10
“Based on the SC-IAT and a suggestion by Karpinski and Steinman 36 , we calculated the so-called D-score, which designates an association of the cue with positive or negative valence.”
Ong, M., Lee, J., & Parmar, B. L. (2023) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2021.0134 · Cited by 8
Yokota, S., & Tanaka, M. (2022) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-022-05749-y · Cited by 13
“Previous studies on implicit attitudes using the IAT found no correlation between implicit attitudes and social desirability (Egloff & Schmukle, 2002; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006; Pruett & Chan, 2006).”
Gao, X., Sawamura, D., Saito, R., Murakami, Y., Yano, R., Sakuraba, S., Yoshida, S., Sakai, S., & Yoshida, K. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0275914 · Cited by 10
“Referring to [24,31] studies, in blocks 1 & 2, smoking images, positive words, and negative words were presented in a 7:7:10 ratio.”
MethodLi, H., He, X., Xue, L., Guo, L., & Liu, W. (2022) · International Journal of Sexual Health · doi:10.1080/19317611.2022.2067282 · Cited by 11
“The single category IAT (SC-IAT) is a variant of the IAT (Karpinski & Steinman, 2006) that only requires participants responses to a specific attitude object and different evaluations.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBrown, N. B., Peragine, D. E., VanderLaan, D. P., Kingstone, A. F., & Brotto, L. A. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251074 · Cited by 12
“The SC-IAT circumvents this issue by capturing negative and/or positive associations of a single concept [36, 37].”
BackgroundFarrell, L., Petzel, Z. W., McCormack, T., Turner, R. N., Rafferty, K., & Latu, I. M. (2020) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biaa136 · Cited by 12
Zahler, L., Sommer, K., Reinecke, A., Wilhelm, F. H., Margraf, J., & Woud, M. L. (2020) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-020-10103-6 · Cited by 16
Measuring objectification through the Body Inversion Paradigm: Methodological issues
Zogmaister, C., Durante, F., Mari, S., Crippa, F., & Volpato, C. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229161 · Cited by 13
“object) association through a singlecategory IAT (SC-IAT, [55]; see [50]).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Temple University (US)
- ORCID
- Karpinski, Andrew
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-32
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W1998043162
- Cited by
- 1,108
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 57
- FWCI
- 107.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- Single Category Implicit Association Test, Implicit Association Test, implicit social cognition, evaluative associations, attitude measurement, self-esteem, racial attitudes, self-presentation, faking, reliability statistics, validity, individual differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Association Learning, Attitude, Awareness, Choice Behavior, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Individuality, Internal-External Control, Male, Personality Inventory, Prejudice, Psychometrics, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Students, Reproducibility of Results, Black People, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review